These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

298 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26141308)

  • 1. Ligand- and receptor-based docking with LiBELa.
    dos Santos Muniz H; Nascimento AS
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2015 Aug; 29(8):713-23. PubMed ID: 26141308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Improving docking results via reranking of ensembles of ligand poses in multiple X-ray protein conformations with MM-GBSA.
    Greenidge PA; Kramer C; Mozziconacci JC; Sherman W
    J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Oct; 54(10):2697-717. PubMed ID: 25266271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Advances in Docking.
    Sulimov VB; Kutov DC; Sulimov AV
    Curr Med Chem; 2019; 26(42):7555-7580. PubMed ID: 30182836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Ligand-biased ensemble receptor docking (LigBEnD): a hybrid ligand/receptor structure-based approach.
    Lam PC; Abagyan R; Totrov M
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2018 Jan; 32(1):187-198. PubMed ID: 28887659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. HarmonyDOCK: the structural analysis of poses in protein-ligand docking.
    Plewczynski D; Philips A; Von Grotthuss M; Rychlewski L; Ginalski K
    J Comput Biol; 2014 Mar; 21(3):247-56. PubMed ID: 21091053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comprehensive evaluation of ten docking programs on a diverse set of protein-ligand complexes: the prediction accuracy of sampling power and scoring power.
    Wang Z; Sun H; Yao X; Li D; Xu L; Li Y; Tian S; Hou T
    Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2016 May; 18(18):12964-75. PubMed ID: 27108770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Ligity: A Non-Superpositional, Knowledge-Based Approach to Virtual Screening.
    Ebejer JP; Finn PW; Wong WK; Deane CM; Morris GM
    J Chem Inf Model; 2019 Jun; 59(6):2600-2616. PubMed ID: 31117509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. PLHINT: A knowledge-driven computational approach based on the intermolecular H bond interactions at the protein-ligand interface from docking solutions.
    Kumar SP
    J Mol Graph Model; 2018 Jan; 79():194-212. PubMed ID: 29241118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Rescoring of docking poses under Occam's Razor: are there simpler solutions?
    Zhenin M; Bahia MS; Marcou G; Varnek A; Senderowitz H; Horvath D
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2018 Sep; 32(9):877-888. PubMed ID: 30173397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Target-specific native/decoy pose classifier improves the accuracy of ligand ranking in the CSAR 2013 benchmark.
    Fourches D; Politi R; Tropsha A
    J Chem Inf Model; 2015 Jan; 55(1):63-71. PubMed ID: 25521713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. CSAR Benchmark of Flexible MedusaDock in Affinity Prediction and Nativelike Binding Pose Selection.
    Nedumpully-Govindan P; Jemec DB; Ding F
    J Chem Inf Model; 2016 Jun; 56(6):1042-52. PubMed ID: 26252196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Time-efficient docking of flexible ligands into active sites of proteins.
    Rarey M; Kramer B; Lengauer T
    Proc Int Conf Intell Syst Mol Biol; 1995; 3():300-8. PubMed ID: 7584452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Docking software performance in protein-glycosaminoglycan systems.
    Uciechowska-Kaczmarzyk U; Chauvot de Beauchene I; Samsonov SA
    J Mol Graph Model; 2019 Jul; 90():42-50. PubMed ID: 30959268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. ProPose: a docking engine based on a fully configurable protein-ligand interaction model.
    Seifert MH; Schmitt F; Herz T; Kramer B
    J Mol Model; 2004 Dec; 10(5-6):342-57. PubMed ID: 15597203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. FlexE: efficient molecular docking considering protein structure variations.
    Claussen H; Buning C; Rarey M; Lengauer T
    J Mol Biol; 2001 Apr; 308(2):377-95. PubMed ID: 11327774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. HybridDock: A Hybrid Protein-Ligand Docking Protocol Integrating Protein- and Ligand-Based Approaches.
    Huang SY; Li M; Wang J; Pan Y
    J Chem Inf Model; 2016 Jun; 56(6):1078-87. PubMed ID: 26317502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Development and validation of a modular, extensible docking program: DOCK 5.
    Moustakas DT; Lang PT; Pegg S; Pettersen E; Kuntz ID; Brooijmans N; Rizzo RC
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2006; 20(10-11):601-19. PubMed ID: 17149653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Beware of machine learning-based scoring functions-on the danger of developing black boxes.
    Gabel J; Desaphy J; Rognan D
    J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Oct; 54(10):2807-15. PubMed ID: 25207678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Machine learning in computational docking.
    Khamis MA; Gomaa W; Ahmed WF
    Artif Intell Med; 2015 Mar; 63(3):135-52. PubMed ID: 25724101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cheminformatics meets molecular mechanics: a combined application of knowledge-based pose scoring and physical force field-based hit scoring functions improves the accuracy of structure-based virtual screening.
    Hsieh JH; Yin S; Wang XS; Liu S; Dokholyan NV; Tropsha A
    J Chem Inf Model; 2012 Jan; 52(1):16-28. PubMed ID: 22017385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.