109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2614178)
21. Prophylactic Oophorectomy: Reducing the U.S. Death Rate from Epithelial Ovarian Cancer. A Continuing Debate.
Piver MS
Oncologist; 1996; 1(5):326-330. PubMed ID: 10388011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. [Breast cancer].
Fukuda M; Miyamoto K; Hashizume R; Okamoto J; Kawamoto H; Yabuki Y; Ogata H; Ohta T
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho; 2002 Nov; 29(11):1900-6. PubMed ID: 12465388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Improved survival rate for women with interval breast cancer - results from the breast cancer screening programme in Malmö, Sweden 1976-1999.
Zackrisson S; Janzon L; Manjer J; Andersson I
J Med Screen; 2007; 14(3):138-43. PubMed ID: 17925086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. [A comparative analysis of interval breast cancer with breast cancer detected by mass screening or in outpatient clinics].
Komaki K; Morimoto T; Oshimo K; Mori T; Sasa M; Konishi Y; Monden Y
Nihon Geka Gakkai Zasshi; 1992 Apr; 93(4):413-8. PubMed ID: 1603047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Screening for breast cancer in women aged 41--60.
Soini I; Lauslahti K
Ann Clin Res; 1976 Dec; 8(6):403-7. PubMed ID: 1008478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Cost-effectiveness analysis of screening modalities for breast cancer in Japan with special reference to women aged 40-49 years.
Ohnuki K; Kuriyama S; Shoji N; Nishino Y; Tsuji I; Ohuchi N
Cancer Sci; 2006 Nov; 97(11):1242-7. PubMed ID: 16918992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. [Breast cancer screening. State of the art and introduction to preventive measures].
von Fournier D; Anton HW; Junkermann H; Bastert G; van Kaick G
Radiologe; 1993 May; 33(5):227-35. PubMed ID: 8516433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Results of MRI screening for breast cancer in high-risk patients with LCIS and atypical hyperplasia.
Port ER; Park A; Borgen PI; Morris E; Montgomery LL
Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Mar; 14(3):1051-7. PubMed ID: 17206485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Relationship between method of detection of breast cancer and stage of disease, method of treatment, and survival in women aged 40 to 49 years.
Maibenco D; Daoud Y; Phillips E; Saxe A
Am Surg; 1999 Nov; 65(11):1061-6. PubMed ID: 10551757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Attitudes of Colorado health professionals toward breast and cervical cancer screening in Hispanic women.
Bakemeier RF; Krebs LU; Murphy JR; Shen Z; Ryals T
J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr; 1995; (18):95-100. PubMed ID: 8562228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Results of intermediate measures from a population-based, randomized trial of mammographic screening prevalence and detection of breast carcinoma among Asian women: the Singapore Breast Screening Project.
Ng EH; Ng FC; Tan PH; Low SC; Chiang G; Tan KP; Seow A; Emmanuel S; Tan CH; Ho GH; Ng LT; Wilde CC
Cancer; 1998 Apr; 82(8):1521-8. PubMed ID: 9554530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. A workplace breast cancer screening program. Costs and components.
Schrammel P; Griffiths RI; Griffiths CB
AAOHN J; 1998 Nov; 46(11):523-9. PubMed ID: 9934000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. [The present status of mass population screening for cancer of the uterine cervix and the therapeutic results in the detected cases in Miyagi Prefecture].
Sato S; Toki T; Yamauchi R; Wakisaka T; Sakahira H; Mori T; Yajima A; Suzuki M; Nasu I; Sato S; Kaneda N; Higashiiwai H
Nihon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi; 1983 Feb; 35(2):127-33. PubMed ID: 6864010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. [Evaluation of service screening for breast cancer by clinical breast examination using regional cancer registry data].
Sibata A; Takahashi T; Ouchi N; Fukao A
Nihon Koshu Eisei Zasshi; 2005 Feb; 52(2):128-36. PubMed ID: 15791899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Comparison of prognostic and socio-economic factors in screen-detected and symptomatic cases of breast cancer.
Garvican L; Littlejohns P
Public Health; 1998 Jan; 112(1):15-20. PubMed ID: 9490883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Effects of breast self-examination (BSE) program for detection early stage of breast cancer.
Kamproh S; Fungpong S
J Med Assoc Thai; 2008 Oct; 91 Suppl 3():S147-51. PubMed ID: 19253511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Nipple discharge cytology in mass screening for breast cancer.
Takeda T; Matsui A; Sato Y; Irumagawa H; Kato A; Ito K; Ishioka K; Higashiiwai H
Acta Cytol; 1990; 34(2):161-4. PubMed ID: 2321448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Recurrence-free survival in patients with small breast cancer. An analysis of cancers 10 mm or less detected clinically and by screening.
Arnesson LG; Smeds S; Fagerberg G
Eur J Surg; 1994 May; 160(5):271-6. PubMed ID: 8075195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Breast cancer detected by mass screening using physical examination alone.
Morimoto T; Komaki K; Oshimo K; Yamakawa T; Mitsuyama N; Tanaka T; Monden Y
Jpn J Surg; 1987 Sep; 17(5):377-81. PubMed ID: 3430900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. High detection rate of breast cancer by mass screening using mammography in Japan.
Morimoto T; Sasa M; Yamaguchi T; Harada K; Sagara Y
Jpn J Cancer Res; 1994 Dec; 85(12):1193-5. PubMed ID: 7852181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
