These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

326 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26142029)

  • 1. Initial Assessment and Resuscitation in Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding.
    Simon TG; Travis AC; Saltzman JR
    Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am; 2015 Jul; 25(3):429-42. PubMed ID: 26142029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Risk scoring systems to predict need for clinical intervention for patients with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal tract bleeding.
    Chen IC; Hung MS; Chiu TF; Chen JC; Hsiao CT
    Am J Emerg Med; 2007 Sep; 25(7):774-9. PubMed ID: 17870480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Risk stratification in acute upper GI bleeding: comparison of the AIMS65 score with the Glasgow-Blatchford and Rockall scoring systems.
    Robertson M; Majumdar A; Boyapati R; Chung W; Worland T; Terbah R; Wei J; Lontos S; Angus P; Vaughan R
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2016 Jun; 83(6):1151-60. PubMed ID: 26515955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of three scoring systems for risk stratification in elderly patients wıth acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
    Kalkan Ç; Soykan I; Karakaya F; Tüzün A; Gençtürk ZB
    Geriatr Gerontol Int; 2017 Apr; 17(4):575-583. PubMed ID: 27075860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of risk scoring systems for patients presenting with upper gastrointestinal bleeding: international multicentre prospective study.
    Stanley AJ; Laine L; Dalton HR; Ngu JH; Schultz M; Abazi R; Zakko L; Thornton S; Wilkinson K; Khor CJ; Murray IA; Laursen SB;
    BMJ; 2017 Jan; 356():i6432. PubMed ID: 28053181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of AIMS65 Score and Other Scoring Systems for Predicting Clinical Outcomes in Koreans with Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding.
    Park SM; Yeum SC; Kim BW; Kim JS; Kim JH; Sim EH; Ji JS; Choi H
    Gut Liver; 2016 Jul; 10(4):526-31. PubMed ID: 27377742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of the Glasgow-Blatchford and AIMS65 scoring systems for risk stratification in upper gastrointestinal bleeding in the emergency department.
    Yaka E; Yılmaz S; Doğan NÖ; Pekdemir M
    Acad Emerg Med; 2015 Jan; 22(1):22-30. PubMed ID: 25556538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding.
    Rahman SI; Saeian K
    Crit Care Clin; 2016 Apr; 32(2):223-39. PubMed ID: 27016164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Initial Assessment, Risk Stratification, and Early Management of Acute Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage.
    Cai JX; Saltzman JR
    Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am; 2018 Jul; 28(3):261-275. PubMed ID: 29933774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Acute, nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
    Klein A; Gralnek IM
    Curr Opin Crit Care; 2015 Apr; 21(2):154-62. PubMed ID: 25692808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. AIMS65 scoring system is comparable to Glasgow-Blatchford score or Rockall score for prediction of clinical outcomes for non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
    Kim MS; Choi J; Shin WC
    BMC Gastroenterol; 2019 Jul; 19(1):136. PubMed ID: 31349816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Management of nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
    Wee E
    J Postgrad Med; 2011; 57(2):161-7. PubMed ID: 21654147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of three risk scores to predict outcomes in upper gastrointestinal bleeding; modifying Glasgow-Blatchford with albumin.
    Shafaghi A; Gharibpoor F; Mahdipour Z; Samadani AA
    Rom J Intern Med; 2019 Dec; 57(4):322-333. PubMed ID: 31268861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Comparison between Glascow-Blatchford, Rockall and AIMS65 scores in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding in a hospital in Lima, Peru].
    Espinoza-Ríos J; Aguilar Sánchez V; Bravo Paredes EA; Pinto Valdivia J; Huerta-Mercado Tenorio J
    Rev Gastroenterol Peru; 2016; 36(2):143-52. PubMed ID: 27409091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of risk scores and shock index in hemodynamically stable patients presenting to the emergency department with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
    Jung DH; Ko BS; Kim YJ; Kim WY
    Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2019 Jul; 31(7):781-785. PubMed ID: 31008809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Initial assessment and management of patients with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
    Bethea ED; Travis AC; Saltzman JR
    J Clin Gastroenterol; 2014; 48(10):823-9. PubMed ID: 25090451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Risk assessment scores for patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding and their use in clinical practice.
    Waddell KM; Stanley AJ
    Hosp Pract (1995); 2015; 43(5):290-8. PubMed ID: 26536295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Analysis of the patients with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding and comparison of Rockall and Glasgow-Blatchford scores.
    Aktas G; Ustaoglu M; Bakir T; Aslan R; Goren F; Bektas A
    Indian J Gastroenterol; 2022 Dec; 41(6):576-582. PubMed ID: 36571703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Performance of the Glasgow-Blatchford score in predicting clinical outcomes and intervention in hospitalized patients with upper GI bleeding.
    Bryant RV; Kuo P; Williamson K; Yam C; Schoeman MN; Holloway RH; Nguyen NQ
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2013 Oct; 78(4):576-83. PubMed ID: 23790755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Advances in management of nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
    Holzwanger EA; Mahmoud M; Wassef W
    Curr Opin Gastroenterol; 2018 Nov; 34(6):436-443. PubMed ID: 30299288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.