182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26142726)
1. The Functionality Assessment Flowchart (FAF): a new simple and reliable method to measure performance status with a high percentage of agreement between observers.
Paiva CE; Siquelli FA; Santos HA; Costa MM; Massaro DR; Lacerda DC; Nunes JS; de Pádua Souza C; Paiva BS
BMC Cancer; 2015 Jul; 15():501. PubMed ID: 26142726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Nurse and physician inter-rater agreement of three performance status measures in palliative care outpatients.
Zimmermann C; Burman D; Bandukwala S; Seccareccia D; Kaya E; Bryson J; Rodin G; Lo C
Support Care Cancer; 2010 May; 18(5):609-16. PubMed ID: 19629537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Should patient-rated performance status affect treatment decisions in advanced lung cancer?
Dajczman E; Kasymjanova G; Kreisman H; Swinton N; Pepe C; Small D
J Thorac Oncol; 2008 Oct; 3(10):1133-6. PubMed ID: 18827609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Karnofsky and ECOG performance status scoring in lung cancer: a prospective, longitudinal study of 536 patients from a single institution.
Buccheri G; Ferrigno D; Tamburini M
Eur J Cancer; 1996 Jun; 32A(7):1135-41. PubMed ID: 8758243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Simple prognostic model for patients with advanced cancer based on performance status.
Jang RW; Caraiscos VB; Swami N; Banerjee S; Mak E; Kaya E; Rodin G; Bryson J; Ridley JZ; Le LW; Zimmermann C
J Oncol Pract; 2014 Sep; 10(5):e335-41. PubMed ID: 25118208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Interconversion of two commonly used performance tools: An analysis of 5844 paired assessments in 1501 lung cancer patients.
Prasad KT; Kaur H; Muthu V; Aggarwal AN; Behera D; Singh N
World J Clin Oncol; 2018 Nov; 9(7):140-147. PubMed ID: 30425939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Performance status assessment in cancer patients. An inter-observer variability study.
Sørensen JB; Klee M; Palshof T; Hansen HH
Br J Cancer; 1993 Apr; 67(4):773-5. PubMed ID: 8471434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Inter-rater reliability in performance status assessment among health care professionals: a systematic review.
Chow R; Chiu N; Bruera E; Krishnan M; Chiu L; Lam H; DeAngelis C; Pulenzas N; Vuong S; Chow E
Ann Palliat Med; 2016 Apr; 5(2):83-92. PubMed ID: 27121736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Observer error in grading performance status in cancer patients.
Taylor AE; Olver IN; Sivanthan T; Chi M; Purnell C
Support Care Cancer; 1999 Sep; 7(5):332-5. PubMed ID: 10483818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Conversion of Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG) to Palliative Performance Scale (PPS), and the interchangeability of PPS and KPS in prognostic tools.
de Kock I; Mirhosseini M; Lau F; Thai V; Downing M; Quan H; Lesperance M; Yang J
J Palliat Care; 2013; 29(3):163-9. PubMed ID: 24380215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparing Physician and Nurse Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG-PS) Ratings as Predictors of Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Cancer.
Neeman E; Gresham G; Ovasapians N; Hendifar A; Tuli R; Figlin R; Shinde A
Oncologist; 2019 Dec; 24(12):e1460-e1466. PubMed ID: 31227648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Health-related quality of life in early breast cancer.
Groenvold M
Dan Med Bull; 2010 Sep; 57(9):B4184. PubMed ID: 20816024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prognostic value of performance status assessed by patients themselves, nurses, and oncologists in advanced non-small cell lung cancer.
Ando M; Ando Y; Hasegawa Y; Shimokata K; Minami H; Wakai K; Ohno Y; Sakai S
Br J Cancer; 2001 Nov; 85(11):1634-9. PubMed ID: 11742480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Palliative Performance Scale: cross cultural adaptation and psychometric validation for Polish hospice setting.
Dzierżanowski T; Gradalski T; Kozlowski M
BMC Palliat Care; 2020 Apr; 19(1):52. PubMed ID: 32321494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Performance Status Assessment by Using ECOG (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group) Score for Cancer Patients by Oncology Healthcare Professionals.
Azam F; Latif MF; Farooq A; Tirmazy SH; AlShahrani S; Bashir S; Bukhari N
Case Rep Oncol; 2019; 12(3):728-736. PubMed ID: 31616281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Intra and interobserver variability in cancer patients' performance status assessed according to Karnofsky and ECOG scales.
Roila F; Lupattelli M; Sassi M; Basurto C; Bracarda S; Picciafuoco M; Boschetti E; Milella G; Ballatori E; Tonato M
Ann Oncol; 1991 Jun; 2(6):437-9. PubMed ID: 1768630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) or Physical Performance Test (PPT)? That is the question.
Terret C; Albrand G; Moncenix G; Droz JP
Crit Rev Oncol Hematol; 2011 Feb; 77(2):142-7. PubMed ID: 20185330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Differences in Performance Status Assessment Among Palliative Care Specialists, Nurses, and Medical Oncologists.
Kim YJ; Hui D; Zhang Y; Park JC; Chisholm G; Williams J; Bruera E
J Pain Symptom Manage; 2015 Jun; 49(6):1050-1058.e2. PubMed ID: 25542550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Inter-rater reliability in performance status assessment between clinicians and patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Chow R; Zimmermann C; Bruera E; Temel J; Im J; Lock M
BMJ Support Palliat Care; 2020 Jun; 10(2):129-135. PubMed ID: 31806655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Development, validity, and reliability of The Assessment of Pain and Occupational Performance (POP): a new instrument using two dimensions in the investigation of disability in back pain.
Perneros G; Tropp H
Spine J; 2009 Jun; 9(6):486-98. PubMed ID: 19398217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
