BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

303 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26142918)

  • 1. Letter to the Editor on Cohen et al. (Letter commenting on: J Clin Epidemiol. 2015;68:299-306).
    Hoaglin DC
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Jan; 69():261-2. PubMed ID: 26142918
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Response to letter by Hoaglin: Heterogeneity in likelihood ratios.
    Cohen JF; Chalumeau M; Bossuyt PM
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Jan; 69():262-3. PubMed ID: 26130493
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cochran's Q test was useful to assess heterogeneity in likelihood ratios in studies of diagnostic accuracy.
    Cohen JF; Chalumeau M; Cohen R; Korevaar DA; Khoshnood B; Bossuyt PM
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2015 Mar; 68(3):299-306. PubMed ID: 25441698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. False discovery rate control is not always a replacement for Bonferroni adjustment (Letter commenting on: J Clin Epidemiol. 2014;67:850-7).
    Frane AV
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Jan; 69():263. PubMed ID: 26130494
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Letter to the Editor.
    Andrade CR
    Codas; 2017 Feb; 29(1):e20160149. PubMed ID: 28273249
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Making sense of diagnostic test likelihood ratios.
    Perera R; Heneghan C
    ACP J Club; 2007; 146(2):A8-9. PubMed ID: 17335149
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. External validation is only needed when prediction models are worth it (Letter commenting on: J Clin Epidemiol. 2015;68:25-34).
    Martens FK; Kers JG; Janssens AC
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Jan; 69():249-50. PubMed ID: 25726454
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Response to the letter by Guogen Shan and Hua Zhang (response to letter commenting: J Clin Epidemiol. 2015;68:733-739).
    Borkhoff CM; Johnston PR; Stephens D; Atenafu E
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2017 Apr; 84():190-191. PubMed ID: 28063916
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Test-treatment RCTs are sheep in wolves' clothing (Letter commenting on: J Clin Epidemiol. 2014;67:612-21).
    Ferrante di Ruffano L; Deeks JJ
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Jan; 69():266-7. PubMed ID: 26130595
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Diagnostic tests 4: likelihood ratios.
    Deeks JJ; Altman DG
    BMJ; 2004 Jul; 329(7458):168-9. PubMed ID: 15258077
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Evaluation of added value of diagnostic tests].
    Knol A
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2000 Aug; 144(33):1608. PubMed ID: 10965371
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Simplified calculations using likelihood ratios.
    Sotos JG
    ACP J Club; 2007; 146(2):A10. PubMed ID: 17335150
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Portability of therapeutic effects (letter commenting: J Clin Epidemiol. 2015;68(11):1251--1260.).
    Trampisch HJ
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Jul; 75():129. PubMed ID: 26964706
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. There is no reverse hierarchy (letter commenting: J Clin Epidemiol. 2015;68(11):1251--1260.).
    Windeler J
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Jul; 75():127-8. PubMed ID: 26845746
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of diagnostic tests without gold standards.
    Hui SL; Zhou XH
    Stat Methods Med Res; 1998 Dec; 7(4):354-70. PubMed ID: 9871952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Verification problems in diagnostic accuracy studies: consequences and solutions.
    de Groot JA; Bossuyt PM; Reitsma JB; Rutjes AW; Dendukuri N; Janssen KJ; Moons KG
    BMJ; 2011 Aug; 343():d4770. PubMed ID: 21810869
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Presentation of diagnostic test accuracy.
    Brotman DJ
    Ann Intern Med; 2006 Feb; 144(3):221; author reply 221-2. PubMed ID: 16461974
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The prediction impact curve is proportional to the proportion of cases followed (letter commenting: J Clin Epidemiol 2016;69:361-363).
    Gail MH
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2017 May; 85():70. PubMed ID: 28645364
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. We should not be so quick to abandon the use of domain experts and full models (letter commenting: J Clin Epidemiol. 2015;71C:76--85.).
    Kattan MW; Harrell FE
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Jul; 75():131. PubMed ID: 26939928
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A third perspective on the effects of general health checks may provide a less biased estimate (letter commenting J Clin Epidemiol 2016;71:120-2).
    Larsen LB; Thilsing T; Sondergaard J; Bjerregaard AL
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2018 Oct; 102():144-145. PubMed ID: 29802936
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.