These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

303 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26142918)

  • 21. Exact unconditional sample size determination for paired binary data (letter commenting: J Clin Epidemiol. 2015;68:733-739).
    Shan G; Zhang H
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2017 Apr; 84():188-190. PubMed ID: 28063912
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A primer on measures of treatment effectiveness and diagnostic test performance.
    Katz DA
    WMJ; 1999; 98(2):37-43. PubMed ID: 10235061
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Re: "A note on unmasking" (Letter commenting on: J Clin Epidemiol. 2014;67:1059-69).
    Bello S; Hróbjartsson A
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Jan; 69():265. PubMed ID: 26154845
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Pathophysiology and clinical trials have limitations in some areas of medicine: focus on psychiatry (letter commenting: J Clin Epidemiol. 2014;67(4):361-363.).
    de Leon J; Stephens DB
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Jul; 75():126-7. PubMed ID: 26808819
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Evaluation of diagnostic tests for infectious diseases: general principles.
    ; Banoo S; Bell D; Bossuyt P; Herring A; Mabey D; Poole F; Smith PG; Sriram N; Wongsrichanalai C; Linke R; O'Brien R; Perkins M
    Nat Rev Microbiol; 2008 Nov; 6(11 Suppl):S16-26. PubMed ID: 22745954
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Beyond the corrupting influence of pharmaceutical companies on antidepressant meta-analyses (Letter commenting on: J Clin Epidemiol. 70, 2016, 155-163).
    de Leon J
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Oct; 78():127-128. PubMed ID: 26987506
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The spectrum effect in tests for risk prediction, screening, and diagnosis.
    Usher-Smith JA; Sharp SJ; Griffin SJ
    BMJ; 2016 Jun; 353():i3139. PubMed ID: 27334281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The leaf plot: a novel way of presenting the value of tests.
    Coulthard MG; Coulthard T
    Br J Gen Pract; 2019 Apr; 69(681):205-206. PubMed ID: 30858331
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Validation of surrogate end points for overall survival in advanced colorectal cancer: further need for clarification: Letter to the editor on: Ciani et al., 2015, Meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials show suboptimal validity of surrogate outcomes for overall survival in advanced colorectal cancer. 2015, J Clin Epidemiol 68:833-842.
    Schürmann C; Wieseler B
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Feb; 70():278-9. PubMed ID: 26348800
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. How to evaluate the evidence from animal and human studies: the case of teriparatide (Letter commenting on: J Clin Epidemiol. 2015;68:698-702).
    Wei D; Chen Y; Yang K
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Jan; 69():252-3. PubMed ID: 26318827
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Research gap of guidelines might be an important approach to prioritization (Letter commenting on: J Clin Epidemiol. 2015;68:341-6).
    Wang Q; Wang X; Chen Y; Yang K
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Jan; 69():251-2. PubMed ID: 26073901
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Correcting for verification bias in studies of a diagnostic test's accuracy.
    Zhou XH
    Stat Methods Med Res; 1998 Dec; 7(4):337-53. PubMed ID: 9871951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Research and statistics: likelihood ratio in diagnosis.
    Crewe S; Rowe PC
    Pediatr Rev; 2011 Jul; 32(7):296-8. PubMed ID: 21724905
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Interpreting diagnostic accuracy studies for patient care.
    Mallett S; Halligan S; Thompson M; Collins GS; Altman DG
    BMJ; 2012 Jul; 345():e3999. PubMed ID: 22750423
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Evaluation of diagnostic methods].
    Doyon F; Hill C
    J Radiol; 2001 Feb; 82(2):117-25. PubMed ID: 11428206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Development of search strategies for systematic reviews: reply to commentary by Dintsios and Niederstadt (Letter commenting on: J Clin Epidemiol. 2015;68:191-199).
    Hausner E; Waffenschmidt S
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Jan; 69():259-61. PubMed ID: 26093311
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Literature search methodology for systematic reviews: conventional and natural language processing enabled methods are complementary (Letter commenting on: J Clin Epidemiol. 2015;68:191-9).
    Boeker M; Motschall E; Vach W
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Jan; 69():253-5. PubMed ID: 26117425
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Reply to Tardieu et al.
    Venkatesan A; Glaser CA
    Clin Infect Dis; 2014 May; 58(10):1493. PubMed ID: 24585697
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Determining the area under the ROC curve for a binary diagnostic test.
    Cantor SB; Kattan MW
    Med Decis Making; 2000; 20(4):468-70. PubMed ID: 11059479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. In defense of King et al: the validity of manual examination in assessing patients with neck pain.
    Bogduk N
    Spine J; 2007; 7(6):749-52; author reply 752-3. PubMed ID: 17998135
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.