These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26143023)

  • 1. Conceptual and Procedural Shortcomings of the Systematic Review "Evidence That Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) Generates Little-to-no Reliable Neurophysiologic Effect Beyond MEP Amplitude Modulation in Healthy Human Subjects: A Systematic Review" by Horvath and Co-workers.
    Antal A; Keeser D; Priori A; Padberg F; Nitsche MA
    Brain Stimul; 2015; 8(4):846-9. PubMed ID: 26143023
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evidence that transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) generates little-to-no reliable neurophysiologic effect beyond MEP amplitude modulation in healthy human subjects: A systematic review.
    Horvath JC; Forte JD; Carter O
    Neuropsychologia; 2015 Jan; 66():213-36. PubMed ID: 25448853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Voluntary movement reverses the effect of cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on corticomotor excitability.
    Ataoglu EE; Caglayan HB; Cengiz B
    Exp Brain Res; 2017 Sep; 235(9):2653-2659. PubMed ID: 28577024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of a common transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) protocol on motor evoked potentials found to be highly variable within individuals over 9 testing sessions.
    Horvath JC; Vogrin SJ; Carter O; Cook MJ; Forte JD
    Exp Brain Res; 2016 Sep; 234(9):2629-42. PubMed ID: 27150317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Safety and effects on motor cortex excitability of five cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation sessions in 25hours.
    Zappasodi F; Musumeci G; Navarra R; Di Lazzaro V; Caulo M; Uncini A
    Neurophysiol Clin; 2018 Apr; 48(2):77-87. PubMed ID: 29248201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Systematic assessment of duration and intensity of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation on primary motor cortex excitability.
    Tremblay S; Larochelle-Brunet F; Lafleur LP; El Mouderrib S; Lepage JF; Théoret H
    Eur J Neurosci; 2016 Sep; 44(5):2184-90. PubMed ID: 27336413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reduced Current Spread by Concentric Electrodes in Transcranial Electrical Stimulation (tES).
    Bortoletto M; Rodella C; Salvador R; Miranda PC; Miniussi C
    Brain Stimul; 2016; 9(4):525-8. PubMed ID: 27061368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Variability in response to transcranial direct current stimulation of the motor cortex.
    Wiethoff S; Hamada M; Rothwell JC
    Brain Stimul; 2014; 7(3):468-75. PubMed ID: 24630848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. What is the optimal anodal electrode position for inducing corticomotor excitability changes in transcranial direct current stimulation?
    Lee M; Kim YH; Im CH; Kim JH; Park CH; Chang WH; Lee A
    Neurosci Lett; 2015 Jan; 584():347-50. PubMed ID: 25450146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Polarity-independent effects of tDCS on paired associative stimulation-induced plasticity.
    Faber H; Opitz A; Müller-Dahlhaus F; Ziemann U
    Brain Stimul; 2017; 10(6):1061-1069. PubMed ID: 28822654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Increasing human leg motor cortex excitability by transcranial high frequency random noise stimulation.
    Laczó B; Antal A; Rothkegel H; Paulus W
    Restor Neurol Neurosci; 2014; 32(3):403-10. PubMed ID: 24576783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Stimulation intensities of transcranial direct current stimulation have to be adjusted in children and adolescents.
    Moliadze V; Schmanke T; Andreas S; Lyzhko E; Freitag CM; Siniatchkin M
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2015 Jul; 126(7):1392-9. PubMed ID: 25468234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation enhances time to task failure of a submaximal contraction of elbow flexors without changing corticospinal excitability.
    Abdelmoula A; Baudry S; Duchateau J
    Neuroscience; 2016 May; 322():94-103. PubMed ID: 26892298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Differential effects of cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation of prefrontal, motor and somatosensory cortices on cortical excitability and pain perception - a double-blind randomised sham-controlled study.
    Vaseghi B; Zoghi M; Jaberzadeh S
    Eur J Neurosci; 2015 Oct; 42(7):2426-37. PubMed ID: 26275236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of the effects of transcranial random noise stimulation and transcranial direct current stimulation on motor cortical excitability.
    Ho KA; Taylor JL; Loo CK
    J ECT; 2015 Mar; 31(1):67-72. PubMed ID: 25010032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Enhanced motor learning with bilateral transcranial direct current stimulation: Impact of polarity or current flow direction?
    Naros G; Geyer M; Koch S; Mayr L; Ellinger T; Grimm F; Gharabaghi A
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2016 Apr; 127(4):2119-26. PubMed ID: 26818881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Efficacy of Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation is Related to Sensitivity to Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation.
    Labruna L; Jamil A; Fresnoza S; Batsikadze G; Kuo MF; Vanderschelden B; Ivry RB; Nitsche MA
    Brain Stimul; 2016; 9(1):8-15. PubMed ID: 26493498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Intensity dependent effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on corticospinal excitability in chronic spinal cord injury.
    Murray LM; Edwards DJ; Ruffini G; Labar D; Stampas A; Pascual-Leone A; Cortes M
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2015 Apr; 96(4 Suppl):S114-21. PubMed ID: 25461825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on short-interval intracortical inhibition and intracortical facilitation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Biabani M; Aminitehrani M; Zoghi M; Farrell M; Egan G; Jaberzadeh S
    Rev Neurosci; 2018 Jan; 29(1):99-114. PubMed ID: 28820738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cumulative effects of anodal and priming cathodal tDCS on pegboard test performance and motor cortical excitability.
    Christova M; Rafolt D; Gallasch E
    Behav Brain Res; 2015; 287():27-33. PubMed ID: 25804362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.