These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

91 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26143193)

  • 1. Evaluation and selection of emergency treatment technology based on dynamic fuzzy GRA method for chemical contingency spills.
    Liu J; Guo L; Jiang J; Hao L; Liu R; Wang P
    J Hazard Mater; 2015 Dec; 299():306-15. PubMed ID: 26143193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Multi-stage ranking of emergency technology alternatives for water source pollution accidents using a fuzzy group decision making tool.
    Qu J; Meng X; You H
    J Hazard Mater; 2016 Jun; 310():68-81. PubMed ID: 26897576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Emergency material allocation with time-varying supply-demand based on dynamic optimization method for river chemical spills.
    Liu J; Guo L; Jiang J; Jiang D; Wang P
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2018 Jun; 25(18):17343-17353. PubMed ID: 29654459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Construction of a technique plan repository and evaluation system based on AHP group decision-making for emergency treatment and disposal in chemical pollution accidents.
    Shi S; Cao J; Feng L; Liang W; Zhang L
    J Hazard Mater; 2014 Jul; 276():200-6. PubMed ID: 24887122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Emergency material location-allocation planning using a risk-based integration methodology for river chemical spills.
    Liu J; Jiang D; Guo L; Nan J; Cao W; Wang P
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2020 May; 27(15):17949-17962. PubMed ID: 32166691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Emergency material allocation and scheduling for the application to chemical contingency spills under multiple scenarios.
    Liu J; Guo L; Jiang J; Jiang D; Wang P
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2017 Jan; 24(1):956-968. PubMed ID: 27761867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Development of interval-valued fuzzy GRA with SERVPERF based on subjective and objective weights for evaluation of airline service quality: A case study of Korea low-cost carriers.
    Lee S; Kang D
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(8):e0219739. PubMed ID: 31386667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A triangular fuzzy TOPSIS-based approach for the application of water technologies in different emergency water supply scenarios.
    Qu J; Meng X; Yu H; You H
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2016 Sep; 23(17):17277-86. PubMed ID: 27221588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Fuzzy Group Consensus Decision Making and Its Use in Selecting Energy-Saving and Low-carbon Technology Schemes in Star Hotels.
    Lu P; Yang X; Wang ZJ
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2018 Sep; 15(9):. PubMed ID: 30235887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Research on emergency treatment technology for water pollution accidents where the pollutants are not included in the emergency database.
    Cheng Z; Liu Y; Lin Z; Chen J; Chen Y
    Water Sci Technol; 2021 Nov; 84(9):2318-2334. PubMed ID: 34810314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A novel two-stage evaluation system based on a Group-G1 approach to identify appropriate emergency treatment technology schemes in sudden water source pollution accidents.
    Qu J; Meng X; Hu Q; You H
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2016 Feb; 23(3):2789-801. PubMed ID: 26449677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of remedial options for a benzene-contaminated site through a simulation-based fuzzy-MCDA approach.
    Yang AL; Huang GH; Qin XS; Fan YR
    J Hazard Mater; 2012 Apr; 213-214():421-33. PubMed ID: 22390955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A two-stage optimization model for emergency material reserve layout planning under uncertainty in response to environmental accidents.
    Liu J; Guo L; Jiang J; Jiang D; Liu R; Wang P
    J Hazard Mater; 2016 Jun; 310():30-9. PubMed ID: 26897572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The identification research of emergency treatment technology for sudden heavy metal pollution accidents in drainage basin based on D-S evidence theory.
    Luo Y; Liu Y; Du Q; Chen Q; Cheng Z
    Water Sci Technol; 2019 Dec; 80(12):2392-2403. PubMed ID: 32245931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Hierarchical semi-numeric method for pairwise fuzzy group decision making.
    Marimin M; Umano M; Hatono I; Tamura H
    IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern B Cybern; 2002; 32(5):691-700. PubMed ID: 18244875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Interval-parameter semi-infinite fuzzy-stochastic mixed-integer programming approach for environmental management under multiple uncertainties.
    Guo P; Huang GH
    Waste Manag; 2010 Mar; 30(3):521-31. PubMed ID: 19854040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Application of interval 2-tuple linguistic MULTIMOORA method for health-care waste treatment technology evaluation and selection.
    Liu HC; You JX; Lu C; Shan MM
    Waste Manag; 2014 Nov; 34(11):2355-64. PubMed ID: 25151443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Research on decision-making of emergency plan for waterlogging disaster in subway station project based on linguistic intuitionistic fuzzy set and TOPSIS.
    Wu H; Wang JW; Liu S; Yang TY
    Math Biosci Eng; 2020 Jul; 17(5):4825-4851. PubMed ID: 33120530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Transshipment site selection using the AHP and TOPSIS approaches under fuzzy environment.
    Onüt S; Soner S
    Waste Manag; 2008; 28(9):1552-9. PubMed ID: 17768038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Interval-valued hesitant fuzzy TODIM method for dynamic emergency responses.
    Ding Q; Goh M; Wang YM
    Soft comput; 2021; 25(13):8263-8279. PubMed ID: 33935587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.