These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2614349)

  • 1. Screening mammography in the Tampa Bay area: current status and implications for the next decade.
    Clark RA; King PS; Cox CE; Bromley J; Mauer K
    J Fla Med Assoc; 1989 May; 76(5):449-53. PubMed ID: 2614349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. U.S. screening mammography services with mobile units: results from the National Survey of Mammography Facilities.
    Brown ML; Fintor L
    Radiology; 1995 May; 195(2):529-32. PubMed ID: 7724778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Regarding trends in recall, biopsy, and positive biopsy rates for screening mammography.
    Ellis RL
    Radiology; 2006 Jan; 238(1):375-6; author reply 376. PubMed ID: 16373783
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A model-based comparison of breast cancer screening strategies: mammograms and clinical breast examinations.
    Shen Y; Parmigiani G
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2005 Feb; 14(2):529-32. PubMed ID: 15734983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Screening for breast cancer in India--is it an appropriate strategy?
    Moss S
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2008 Sep; 100(18):1270-1. PubMed ID: 18780862
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The control of breast cancer through mammography screening. What is the evidence?
    Tabár L; Dean PB
    Radiol Clin North Am; 1987 Sep; 25(5):993-1005. PubMed ID: 3306777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Mammography screening: successes and problems in implementing widespread use in the United States.
    Gold RH; Bassett LW; Fox SA
    Radiol Clin North Am; 1987 Sep; 25(5):1039-46. PubMed ID: 3628751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Influence of health care, cost, and culture on breast cancer screening: issues facing urban American Indian women.
    Risendal B; Roe D; DeZapien J; Papenfuss M; Giuliano A
    Prev Med; 1999 Dec; 29(6 Pt 1):501-9. PubMed ID: 10600431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Benefits of screening mammography: a review for the primary care physician.
    Reichle JL
    South Med J; 1998 Jun; 91(6):510-7. PubMed ID: 9634110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Accreditation of mammography facilities by the American College of Radiology: results of a national survey.
    Brown ML; Fintor L
    Am J Prev Med; 1994; 10(3):162-7. PubMed ID: 7917443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Attitudes of Colorado health professionals toward breast and cervical cancer screening in Hispanic women.
    Bakemeier RF; Krebs LU; Murphy JR; Shen Z; Ryals T
    J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr; 1995; (18):95-100. PubMed ID: 8562228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Contributions of the epidemiological cancer registries to the evaluation of mammography screening in Germany].
    Urbschat I; Kieschke J; Schlanstedt-Jahn U; von Gehlen S; Thiel A; Jensch P
    Gesundheitswesen; 2005 Jul; 67(7):448-54. PubMed ID: 16103967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The impact of organized mammography service screening on breast carcinoma mortality in seven Swedish counties.
    Duffy SW; Tabár L; Chen HH; Holmqvist M; Yen MF; Abdsalah S; Epstein B; Frodis E; Ljungberg E; Hedborg-Melander C; Sundbom A; Tholin M; Wiege M; Akerlund A; Wu HM; Tung TS; Chiu YH; Chiu CP; Huang CC; Smith RA; Rosén M; Stenbeck M; Holmberg L
    Cancer; 2002 Aug; 95(3):458-69. PubMed ID: 12209737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Enhancing early breast cancer screening: an expanded role for mammography facilities is needed.
    Gregorio DI; Kegeles S; Parker C; Benn S
    Cancer Detect Prev; 1991; 15(2):151-3. PubMed ID: 2032257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Screening Mammography Program of British Columbia: pattern of use and health care system costs.
    Olivotto IA; Kan L; Mates D; King S
    CMAJ; 1999 Feb; 160(3):337-41. PubMed ID: 10065075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Breast cancer screening in relation to access to health services.
    Facione NC
    Oncol Nurs Forum; 1999 May; 26(4):689-96. PubMed ID: 10337647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The 2003 Australian Breast Health Survey: survey design and preliminary results.
    Villanueva EV; Jones S; Nehill C; Favelle S; Steel D; Iverson D; Zorbas H
    BMC Public Health; 2008 Jan; 8():13. PubMed ID: 18194528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Recruiting older women for screening mammography.
    Halabi S; Vogel VG; Bondy ML; Vernon SW
    Cancer Detect Prev; 1993; 17(3):359-65. PubMed ID: 8402722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Strategies for implementation and quality assurance for mammographic screening.
    DeBruhl ND; Farria DM; Bassett LW
    Curr Opin Radiol; 1992 Oct; 4(5):155-9. PubMed ID: 1343948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Variability in the interpretation of screening mammograms by US radiologists. Findings from a national sample.
    Beam CA; Layde PM; Sullivan DC
    Arch Intern Med; 1996 Jan; 156(2):209-13. PubMed ID: 8546556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.