These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26143567)

  • 1. Does Breast Imaging Experience During Residency Translate Into Improved Initial Performance in Digital Breast Tomosynthesis?
    Zhang J; Grimm LJ; Lo JY; Johnson KS; Ghate SV; Walsh R; Mazurowski MA
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2015 Jul; 12(7):728-32. PubMed ID: 26143567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Radiology Trainee Performance in Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: Relationship Between Difficulty and Error-Making Patterns.
    Grimm LJ; Zhang J; Lo JY; Johnson KS; Ghate SV; Walsh R; Mazurowski MA
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2016 Feb; 13(2):198-202. PubMed ID: 26577878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Influences of Radiology Trainees on Screening Mammography Interpretation.
    Hawley JR; Taylor CR; Cubbison AM; Erdal BS; Yildiz VO; Carkaci S
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2016 May; 13(5):554-61. PubMed ID: 26924162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Radiology resident mammography training: interpretation difficulty and error-making patterns.
    Grimm LJ; Kuzmiak CM; Ghate SV; Yoon SC; Mazurowski MA
    Acad Radiol; 2014 Jul; 21(7):888-92. PubMed ID: 24928157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Impact of prior mammograms on combined reading of digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis.
    Kim WH; Chang JM; Koo HR; Seo M; Bae MS; Lee J; Moon WK
    Acta Radiol; 2017 Feb; 58(2):148-155. PubMed ID: 27178032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Digital breast tomosynthesis versus full-field digital mammography: comparison of the accuracy of lesion measurement and characterization using specimens.
    Seo N; Kim HH; Shin HJ; Cha JH; Kim H; Moon JH; Gong G; Ahn SH; Son BH
    Acta Radiol; 2014 Jul; 55(6):661-7. PubMed ID: 24005560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of radiologists' experience on breast cancer detection and localization using digital breast tomosynthesis.
    Alakhras MM; Brennan PC; Rickard M; Bourne R; Mello-Thoms C
    Eur Radiol; 2015 Feb; 25(2):402-9. PubMed ID: 25192796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Predicting error in detecting mammographic masses among radiology trainees using statistical models based on BI-RADS features.
    Grimm LJ; Ghate SV; Yoon SC; Kuzmiak CM; Kim C; Mazurowski MA
    Med Phys; 2014 Mar; 41(3):031909. PubMed ID: 24593727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Two-view and single-view tomosynthesis versus full-field digital mammography: high-resolution X-ray imaging observer study.
    Wallis MG; Moa E; Zanca F; Leifland K; Danielsson M
    Radiology; 2012 Mar; 262(3):788-96. PubMed ID: 22274840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A Case for Wide-Angle Breast Tomosynthesis.
    Samei E; Thompson J; Richard S; Bowsher J
    Acad Radiol; 2015 Jul; 22(7):860-9. PubMed ID: 25920335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Diagnostic accuracy and recall rates for digital mammography and digital mammography combined with one-view and two-view tomosynthesis: results of an enriched reader study.
    Rafferty EA; Park JM; Philpotts LE; Poplack SP; Sumkin JH; Halpern EF; Niklason LT
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Feb; 202(2):273-81. PubMed ID: 24450665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Detection and classification of calcifications on digital breast tomosynthesis and 2D digital mammography: a comparison.
    Spangler ML; Zuley ML; Sumkin JH; Abrams G; Ganott MA; Hakim C; Perrin R; Chough DM; Shah R; Gur D
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Feb; 196(2):320-4. PubMed ID: 21257882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Can digital breast tomosynthesis replace conventional diagnostic mammography views for screening recalls without calcifications? A comparison study in a simulated clinical setting.
    Brandt KR; Craig DA; Hoskins TL; Henrichsen TL; Bendel EC; Brandt SR; Mandrekar J
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Feb; 200(2):291-8. PubMed ID: 23345348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Two-view digital breast tomosynthesis screening with synthetically reconstructed projection images: comparison with digital breast tomosynthesis with full-field digital mammographic images.
    Skaane P; Bandos AI; Eben EB; Jebsen IN; Krager M; Haakenaasen U; Ekseth U; Izadi M; Hofvind S; Gullien R
    Radiology; 2014 Jun; 271(3):655-63. PubMed ID: 24484063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Clinical performance metrics of 3D digital breast tomosynthesis compared with 2D digital mammography for breast cancer screening in community practice.
    Greenberg JS; Javitt MC; Katzen J; Michael S; Holland AE
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Sep; 203(3):687-93. PubMed ID: 24918774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT): initial experience in a clinical setting.
    Skaane P; Gullien R; Bjørndal H; Eben EB; Ekseth U; Haakenaasen U; Jahr G; Jebsen IN; Krager M
    Acta Radiol; 2012 Jun; 53(5):524-9. PubMed ID: 22593120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Using computer-extracted image features for modeling of error-making patterns in detection of mammographic masses among radiology residents.
    Zhang J; Lo JY; Kuzmiak CM; Ghate SV; Yoon SC; Mazurowski MA
    Med Phys; 2014 Sep; 41(9):091907. PubMed ID: 25186394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Initial clinical experience with contrast-enhanced digital breast tomosynthesis.
    Chen SC; Carton AK; Albert M; Conant EF; Schnall MD; Maidment AD
    Acad Radiol; 2007 Feb; 14(2):229-38. PubMed ID: 17236995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Detection of mammographically occult architectural distortion on digital breast tomosynthesis screening: initial clinical experience.
    Partyka L; Lourenco AP; Mainiero MB
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Jul; 203(1):216-22. PubMed ID: 24951218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Does training in the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) improve biopsy recommendations or feature analysis agreement with experienced breast imagers at mammography?
    Berg WA; D'Orsi CJ; Jackson VP; Bassett LW; Beam CA; Lewis RS; Crewson PE
    Radiology; 2002 Sep; 224(3):871-80. PubMed ID: 12202727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.