BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

342 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26144573)

  • 1. Antimüllerian hormone as a predictor of good-quality supernumerary blastocyst cryopreservation among women with levels <1 ng/mL versus 1-4 ng/mL.
    Kavoussi SK; Odenwald KC; Boehnlein LM; Summers-Colquitt RB; Pool TB; Swain JE; Jones JM; Lindstrom MJ; Lebovic DI
    Fertil Steril; 2015 Sep; 104(3):633-6. PubMed ID: 26144573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dynamic antimüllerian hormone levels during controlled ovarian hyperstimulation predict in vitro fertilization response and pregnancy outcomes.
    Styer AK; Gaskins AJ; Brady PC; Sluss PM; Chavarro JE; Hauser RB; Toth TL
    Fertil Steril; 2015 Nov; 104(5):1153-61.e1-7. PubMed ID: 26315051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prognostic indicators of assisted reproduction technology outcomes of cycles with ultralow serum antimüllerian hormone: a multivariate analysis of over 5,000 autologous cycles from the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcome Reporting System database for 2012-2013.
    Seifer DB; Tal O; Wantman E; Edul P; Baker VL
    Fertil Steril; 2016 Feb; 105(2):385-93.e3. PubMed ID: 26515380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Antimüllerian hormone in gonadotropin releasing-hormone antagonist cycles: prediction of ovarian response and cumulative treatment outcome in good-prognosis patients.
    Arce JC; La Marca A; Mirner Klein B; Nyboe Andersen A; Fleming R
    Fertil Steril; 2013 May; 99(6):1644-53. PubMed ID: 23394782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of antimüllerian hormone levels and antral follicle count as predictor of ovarian response to controlled ovarian stimulation in good-prognosis patients at individual fertility clinics in two multicenter trials.
    Nelson SM; Klein BM; Arce JC
    Fertil Steril; 2015 Apr; 103(4):923-930.e1. PubMed ID: 25624196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Female age, serum antimüllerian hormone level, and number of oocytes affect the rate and number of euploid blastocysts in in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles.
    La Marca A; Minasi MG; Sighinolfi G; Greco P; Argento C; Grisendi V; Fiorentino F; Greco E
    Fertil Steril; 2017 Nov; 108(5):777-783.e2. PubMed ID: 28987789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Maternal serum concentration of anti-Müllerian hormone is a better predictor than basal follicle stimulating hormone of successful blastocysts development during IVF treatment.
    Sadruddin S; Barnett B; Ku L; Havemann D; Mucowski S; Herrington R; Burggren W
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(10):e0239779. PubMed ID: 33044971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Follicular fluid anti-Müllerian hormone and inhibin B concentrations: comparison between gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist and GnRH antagonist cycles.
    Lee JR; Kim SH; Kim SM; Jee BC; Ku SY; Suh CS; Choi YM; Kim JG; Moon SY
    Fertil Steril; 2008 Apr; 89(4):860-7. PubMed ID: 18249372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Does a frozen embryo transfer ameliorate the effect of elevated progesterone seen in fresh transfer cycles?
    Healy MW; Patounakis G; Connell MT; Devine K; DeCherney AH; Levy MJ; Hill MJ
    Fertil Steril; 2016 Jan; 105(1):93-9.e1. PubMed ID: 26453267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Antimüllerian hormone as a predictor of live birth following assisted reproduction: an analysis of 85,062 fresh and thawed cycles from the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcome Reporting System database for 2012-2013.
    Tal R; Seifer DB; Wantman E; Baker V; Tal O
    Fertil Steril; 2018 Feb; 109(2):258-265. PubMed ID: 29331235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Live-birth rates in very poor prognosis patients, who are defined as poor responders under the Bologna criteria, with nonelective single embryo, two-embryo, and three or more embryos transferred.
    Gleicher N; Vega MV; Darmon SK; Weghofer A; Wu YG; Wang Q; Zhang L; Albertini DF; Barad DH; Kushnir VA
    Fertil Steril; 2015 Dec; 104(6):1435-41. PubMed ID: 26348275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Can highly sensitive antimüllerian hormone testing predict failed response to ovarian stimulation?
    Burks HR; Ross L; Opper N; Paulson E; Stanczyk FZ; Chung K
    Fertil Steril; 2015 Sep; 104(3):643-8. PubMed ID: 26158904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cryopreserved blastocyst transfer: impact of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist versus antagonist in the previous oocyte retrieval cycles.
    Lee JR; Choi YS; Jee BC; Ku SY; Suh CS; Kim KC; Lee WD; Kim SH
    Fertil Steril; 2007 Nov; 88(5):1344-9. PubMed ID: 17548083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Individualized versus conventional ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization: a multicenter, randomized, controlled, assessor-blinded, phase 3 noninferiority trial.
    Nyboe Andersen A; Nelson SM; Fauser BC; García-Velasco JA; Klein BM; Arce JC;
    Fertil Steril; 2017 Feb; 107(2):387-396.e4. PubMed ID: 27912901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Freeze-all at the blastocyst or bipronuclear stage: a randomized clinical trial.
    Shapiro BS; Daneshmand ST; Garner FC; Aguirre M; Hudson C
    Fertil Steril; 2015 Nov; 104(5):1138-44. PubMed ID: 26255088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Ovarian response to recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone: a randomized, antimüllerian hormone-stratified, dose-response trial in women undergoing in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection.
    Arce JC; Andersen AN; Fernández-Sánchez M; Visnova H; Bosch E; García-Velasco JA; Barri P; de Sutter P; Klein BM; Fauser BC
    Fertil Steril; 2014 Dec; 102(6):1633-40.e5. PubMed ID: 25256937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A randomized, controlled, pilot trial on the effect of dehydroepiandrosterone on ovarian response markers, ovarian response, and in vitro fertilization outcomes in poor responders.
    Yeung TW; Chai J; Li RH; Lee VC; Ho PC; Ng EH
    Fertil Steril; 2014 Jul; 102(1):108-115.e1. PubMed ID: 24796766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Randomized, assessor-blind, antimüllerian hormone-stratified, dose-response trial in Japanese in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection patients undergoing controlled ovarian stimulation with follitropin delta.
    Ishihara O; Klein BM; Arce JC;
    Fertil Steril; 2021 Jun; 115(6):1478-1486. PubMed ID: 33272623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Does the time interval between antimüllerian hormone serum sampling and initiation of ovarian stimulation affect its predictive ability in in vitro fertilization-intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles with a gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist? A retrospective single-center study.
    Polyzos NP; Nelson SM; Stoop D; Nwoye M; Humaidan P; Anckaert E; Devroey P; Tournaye H
    Fertil Steril; 2013 Aug; 100(2):438-44. PubMed ID: 23602319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cryopreservation of blastocysts is the most feasible strategy in good responder patients.
    Mesut N; Ciray HN; Mesut A; Aksoy T; Bahceci M
    Fertil Steril; 2011 Nov; 96(5):1121-5.e1. PubMed ID: 21890133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.