These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2614542)

  • 1. Causation and disease: biomedical science in toxic tort litigation.
    Muscat JE; Huncharek MS
    J Occup Med; 1989 Dec; 31(12):997-1002. PubMed ID: 2614542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Toxic tort litigation: medical and scientific principles in causation.
    Henderson TW
    Am J Epidemiol; 1990 Jul; 132(1 Suppl):S69-78. PubMed ID: 2356839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Would a Federal Judicial Science Board improve toxic tort litigation?
    Brennan TA
    Am J Ind Med; 1990; 17(6):761-71. PubMed ID: 2343878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The case against differential diagnosis: Daubert, medical causation testimony, and the scientific method.
    Hollingsworth JG; Lasker EG
    J Health Law; 2004; 37(1):85-111. PubMed ID: 15191237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The war against junk science: the use of expert panels in complex medical-legal scientific litigation.
    Price JM; Rosenberg ES
    Biomaterials; 1998 Aug; 19(16):1425-32. PubMed ID: 9794513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Toxicogenomics and toxic torts.
    Marchant GE
    Trends Biotechnol; 2002 Aug; 20(8):329-32. PubMed ID: 12127279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A Daubert motion: a legal strategy to exclude essential scientific evidence in toxic tort litigation.
    Melnick RL
    Am J Public Health; 2005; 95 Suppl 1():S30-4. PubMed ID: 16030335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Epidemiology in the courtroom: an evidence-based paradigm for the determination of causation in compensation environments.
    Sinclair DC
    J Occup Environ Med; 2010 Apr; 52(4):456-61. PubMed ID: 20357683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Epidemiology and the law: courts and confidence intervals.
    Christoffel T; Teret SP
    Am J Public Health; 1991 Dec; 81(12):1661-6. PubMed ID: 1746668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Debunking some judicial myths about epidemiology and its relevance to UK tort law.
    Mcivor C
    Med Law Rev; 2013; 21(4):553-87. PubMed ID: 23645537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. ["An Italian Court recognizes the occupational origin of a trigeminal neuroma in a mobile telephone user: a case-study of the complex relationships between science and laws"].
    Lagorio S; Vecchia P
    Med Lav; 2011; 102(2):144-62. PubMed ID: 21485052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Matching evidence about clustered health events with tort law requirements.
    Black B
    Am J Epidemiol; 1990 Jul; 132(1 Suppl):S79-86. PubMed ID: 2356840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Tort Law--Expert Testimony in Asbestos Litigation--District of South Carolina Holds the Every Exposure Theory Insufficient to Demonstrate Specific Causation Even If Legal Conclusions are Scientifically Sound.--Haskins v. 3m Co., Nos. 2:15-cv-02086, 3:15-cv-02123, 2017 WL 3118017 (D.S.C. July 21, 2017).
    Harv Law Rev; 2017 Dec; 131(2):658-65. PubMed ID: 29240325
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. McTear v Imperial Tobacco: understanding the role and limitations of expert epidemiological evidence in scientific litigation.
    Danne A
    J Law Med; 2006 May; 13(4):471-8. PubMed ID: 16756216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The twilight zone between scientific certainty and legal sufficiency: should a jury determine the causation of schizophrenia?
    Goldstein RL
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1987; 15(1):95-104. PubMed ID: 3427234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Untangling causation issues in law and medicine: hazardous substance litigation.
    Brennan TA
    Ann Intern Med; 1987 Nov; 107(5):741-7. PubMed ID: 3310796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The impact of the Daubert case on modern litigation.
    Mavroforou A; Michalodimitrakis E
    Med Law; 2008 Dec; 27(4):755-65. PubMed ID: 19202854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Science and persuasion: environmental disease in U.S. courts.
    Boden LI; Miyares JR; Ozonoff D
    Soc Sci Med; 1988; 27(10):1019-29. PubMed ID: 3059501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Admissibility of scientific evidence post-Daubert.
    Masten J; Strzelczyk JJ
    Health Phys; 2001 Dec; 81(6):678-82. PubMed ID: 11725886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Elements of causation in toxic tort litigation. Science and law must agree.
    Benjamin DM
    J Leg Med; 1993 Mar; 14(1):153-65. PubMed ID: 8463748
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.