These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2614542)

  • 21. Causation's nuclear future: applying proportional liability to the Price-Anderson Act.
    O'Connell WD
    Duke Law J; 2014 Nov; 64(2):333-76. PubMed ID: 25423683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Proving causation: the use and abuse of medical and scientific evidence inside the courtroom--an epidemiologist's critique of the judicial interpretation of the Daubert ruling.
    Egilman D; Kim J; Biklen M
    Food Drug Law J; 2003; 58(2):223-50. PubMed ID: 12866555
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Causality link in criminal law: role of epidemiology].
    Zocchetti C; Riboldi L
    G Ital Med Lav Ergon; 2003; 25(3):292-3. PubMed ID: 14582241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Collective judicial management of mass toxic tort controversies: lessons and issues from the Agent Orange litigation.
    Novey LB
    Soc Sci Med; 1988; 27(10):1071-84. PubMed ID: 3059506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Admissibility of scientific evidence in courts.
    Davies J
    Med Law; 2005 Jun; 24(2):243-57. PubMed ID: 16082863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The interpretation of occupational epidemiologic data in regulation and litigation: studies of auto mechanics and petroleum workers.
    Wong O
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2006 Apr; 44(3):191-7. PubMed ID: 16464525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Legal causation and responsibility for causing harm.
    Ozonoff D
    Am J Public Health; 2005; 95 Suppl 1():S35-8. PubMed ID: 16030336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Scientific inferences in the laboratory and the law.
    Cranor C
    Am J Public Health; 2005; 95 Suppl 1():S121-8. PubMed ID: 16030327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The use of epidemiologic data in the courts.
    Hoffman RE
    Am J Epidemiol; 1984 Aug; 120(2):190-202. PubMed ID: 6465117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Admissibility of expert evidence in toxic tort cases.
    Clemens AM
    Natl Med Leg J; 1992; 3(3):4. PubMed ID: 1623065
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Proof of cancer causation and expert evidence: bringing science to the law and the law to science.
    Kune R; Kune G
    J Law Med; 2003 Aug; 11(1):112-21. PubMed ID: 14526731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Use and misuse of epidemiologic data in the courtroom: defining the limits of inferential and particularistic evidence in mass tort litigation.
    Ginzburg HM
    Am J Law Med; 1986; 12(3-4):423-39. PubMed ID: 3451678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The implementation of medical monitoring programs following potentially hazardous exposures: a medico-legal perspective.
    Vearrier D; Greenberg MI
    Clin Toxicol (Phila); 2017 Nov; 55(9):956-969. PubMed ID: 28644057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Evaluating causality for occupational cancers: the example of firefighters.
    Guidotti TL
    Occup Med (Lond); 2007 Oct; 57(7):466-71. PubMed ID: 17548868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The four most pernicious myths in asbestos litigation: Part I: safe chrysotile and idiopathic mesothelioma.
    Meisenkothen C
    New Solut; 2014; 24(1):1-26. PubMed ID: 25053604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Inconsistency in evidentiary standards for medical testimony: disorder in the courts.
    Kassirer JP; Cecil JS
    JAMA; 2002 Sep; 288(11):1382-7. PubMed ID: 12234232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Changing legal standards for proof of causation in hazardous waste tort cases. Plaintiffs' problems and congressional responses.
    Learner LG; Hartman KL; Berry DS
    Am J Forensic Med Pathol; 1983 Dec; 4(4):359-63. PubMed ID: 6666765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Neurolitigation: a perspective on the elements of expert testimony for extending the Daubert challenge.
    Klee CH; Friedman HJ
    NeuroRehabilitation; 2001; 16(2):79-85. PubMed ID: 11568465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Hazardous substance litigation in Maryland: theories of recovery and proof of causation.
    Gallacher I
    J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1997; 13(2):423-59. PubMed ID: 9212525
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The role of the legal nurse consultant in toxic tort litigation.
    Clemens AM; Woo P
    Natl Med Leg J; 1992; 3(2):1, 6-7. PubMed ID: 1562649
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.