BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26146513)

  • 1. Enhancing the Lasso Approach for Developing a Survival Prediction Model Based on Gene Expression Data.
    Kaneko S; Hirakawa A; Hamada C
    Comput Math Methods Med; 2015; 2015():259474. PubMed ID: 26146513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Gradient lasso for Cox proportional hazards model.
    Sohn I; Kim J; Jung SH; Park C
    Bioinformatics; 2009 Jul; 25(14):1775-81. PubMed ID: 19447787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Gene Selection using a High-Dimensional Regression Model with Microarrays in Cancer Prognostic Studies.
    Kaneko S; Hirakawa A; Hamada C
    Cancer Inform; 2012; 11():29-39. PubMed ID: 22442625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Statistical methods for ranking differentially expressed genes.
    Broberg P
    Genome Biol; 2003; 4(6):R41. PubMed ID: 12801415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Feature selection and survival modeling in The Cancer Genome Atlas.
    Kim H; Bredel M
    Int J Nanomedicine; 2013; 8 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):57-62. PubMed ID: 24098079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Accounting for grouped predictor variables or pathways in high-dimensional penalized Cox regression models.
    Belhechmi S; Bin R; Rotolo F; Michiels S
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2020 Jul; 21(1):277. PubMed ID: 32615919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. IPF-LASSO: Integrative
    Boulesteix AL; De Bin R; Jiang X; Fuchs M
    Comput Math Methods Med; 2017; 2017():7691937. PubMed ID: 28546826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Weighted lasso with data integration.
    Bergersen LC; Glad IK; Lyng H
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2011 Aug; 10(1):. PubMed ID: 23089821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. High-dimensional Cox models: the choice of penalty as part of the model building process.
    Benner A; Zucknick M; Hielscher T; Ittrich C; Mansmann U
    Biom J; 2010 Feb; 52(1):50-69. PubMed ID: 20166132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Predicting survival from microarray data--a comparative study.
    Bøvelstad HM; Nygård S; Størvold HL; Aldrin M; Borgan Ø; Frigessi A; Lingjaerde OC
    Bioinformatics; 2007 Aug; 23(16):2080-7. PubMed ID: 17553857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. CASPAR: a hierarchical bayesian approach to predict survival times in cancer from gene expression data.
    Kaderali L; Zander T; Faigle U; Wolf J; Schultze JL; Schrader R
    Bioinformatics; 2006 Jun; 22(12):1495-502. PubMed ID: 16554338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. L1 penalized estimation in the Cox proportional hazards model.
    Goeman JJ
    Biom J; 2010 Feb; 52(1):70-84. PubMed ID: 19937997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Mixture classification model based on clinical markers for breast cancer prognosis.
    Zeng T; Liu J
    Artif Intell Med; 2010; 48(2-3):129-37. PubMed ID: 20005686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The lasso--a novel method for predictive covariate model building in nonlinear mixed effects models.
    Ribbing J; Nyberg J; Caster O; Jonsson EN
    J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn; 2007 Aug; 34(4):485-517. PubMed ID: 17516152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Weighted lasso in graphical Gaussian modeling for large gene network estimation based on microarray data.
    Shimamura T; Imoto S; Yamaguchi R; Miyano S
    Genome Inform; 2007; 19():142-53. PubMed ID: 18546512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Robust sparse accelerated failure time model for survival analysis.
    Shen H; Chai H; Li M; Zhou Z; Liang Y; Yang Z; Huang H; Liu X; Zhang B
    Technol Health Care; 2018; 26(S1):55-63. PubMed ID: 29689755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Predicting patient survival from microarray data by accelerated failure time modeling using partial least squares and LASSO.
    Datta S; Le-Rademacher J; Datta S
    Biometrics; 2007 Mar; 63(1):259-71. PubMed ID: 17447952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Estimating the false discovery rate using nonparametric deconvolution.
    van de Wiel MA; Kim KI
    Biometrics; 2007 Sep; 63(3):806-15. PubMed ID: 17825012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. compound.Cox: Univariate feature selection and compound covariate for predicting survival.
    Emura T; Matsui S; Chen HY
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2019 Jan; 168():21-37. PubMed ID: 30527130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Bias in error estimation when using cross-validation for model selection.
    Varma S; Simon R
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2006 Feb; 7():91. PubMed ID: 16504092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.