These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2614658)

  • 1. Computerized adaptive personality assessment: an illustration with the Absorption scale.
    Waller NG; Reise SP
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 1989 Dec; 57(6):1051-8. PubMed ID: 2614658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Computerized versus standard administration of the Jenkins Activity Survey (Form T).
    Holden RR; Hickman D
    J Human Stress; 1987; 13(4):175-9. PubMed ID: 3448131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Computerized adaptive personality testing: a review and illustration with the MMPI-2 Computerized Adaptive Version.
    Forbey JD; Ben-Porath YS
    Psychol Assess; 2007 Mar; 19(1):14-24. PubMed ID: 17371120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Psychology of computer use: XX. Sexual abuse recalled: evaluation of a computerized questionnaire in a population of young adult males.
    Bagley C; Genuis M
    Percept Mot Skills; 1991 Feb; 72(1):287-8. PubMed ID: 2038524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparing countdown- and IRT-based approaches to computerized adaptive personality testing.
    Rudick MM; Yam WH; Simms LJ
    Psychol Assess; 2013 Sep; 25(3):769-79. PubMed ID: 23647045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Acceptance of tests presented on a personal computer by inpatients].
    Gitzinger I
    Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol; 1990; 40(3-4):143-5. PubMed ID: 2336455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluating the usefulness of computerized adaptive testing for medical in-course assessment.
    Kreiter CD; Ferguson K; Gruppen LD
    Acad Med; 1999 Oct; 74(10):1125-8. PubMed ID: 10536635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Current developments and future directions in computerized personality assessment.
    Butcher JN; Keller LS; Bacon SF
    J Consult Clin Psychol; 1985 Dec; 53(6):803-15. PubMed ID: 3841357
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The maximum priority index method for severely constrained item selection in computerized adaptive testing.
    Cheng Y; Chang HH
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2009 May; 62(Pt 2):369-83. PubMed ID: 18534047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Modernizing quality of life assessment: development of a multidimensional computerized adaptive questionnaire for patients with schizophrenia.
    Michel P; Baumstarck K; Lancon C; Ghattas B; Loundou A; Auquier P; Boyer L
    Qual Life Res; 2018 Apr; 27(4):1041-1054. PubMed ID: 28343349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Procedures to develop a computerized adaptive test to assess patient-reported physical functioning.
    McCabe E; Gross DP; Bulut O
    Qual Life Res; 2018 Sep; 27(9):2393-2402. PubMed ID: 29881895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comparison of two computer-administered versions of the NIMH Diagnostic Interview Schedule.
    Erdman HP; Klein MH; Greist JH; Skare SS; Husted JJ; Robins LN; Helzer JE; Goldring E; Hamburger M; Miller JP
    J Psychiatr Res; 1992 Jan; 26(1):85-95. PubMed ID: 1560412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of item pool restriction on the precision of ability measurement for a Rasch-based CAT: comparisons to traditional fixed length examinations.
    Halkitis PN
    J Outcome Meas; 1998; 2(2):97-122. PubMed ID: 9661734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessing MMPI constructs through the measurement of response latencies.
    Popham SM; Holden RR
    J Pers Assess; 1990; 54(3-4):469-78. PubMed ID: 2348336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Paper-and-pencil and web-based testing: the measurement invariance of the Big Five personality tests in applied settings.
    Vecchione M; Alessandri G; Barbaranelli C
    Assessment; 2012 Jun; 19(2):243-6. PubMed ID: 21862530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Validation of a computerized adaptive version of the Schedule for Nonadaptive and Adaptive Personality (SNAP).
    Simms LJ; Clark LA
    Psychol Assess; 2005 Mar; 17(1):28-43. PubMed ID: 15769226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Computerization and adaptive administration of the NEO PI-R.
    Reise SP; Henson JM
    Assessment; 2000 Dec; 7(4):347-64. PubMed ID: 11151961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Functioning and validity of a Computerized Adaptive Test to measure anxiety (A-CAT).
    Becker J; Fliege H; Kocalevent RD; Bjorner JB; Rose M; Walter OB; Klapp BF
    Depress Anxiety; 2008; 25(12):E182-94. PubMed ID: 18979458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Improving personality facet scores with multidimensional computer adaptive testing: an illustration with the NEO PI-R.
    Makransky G; Mortensen EL; Glas CA
    Assessment; 2013 Feb; 20(1):3-13. PubMed ID: 22357698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Usability of CAT System for Assessing the Depressive Level of Japanese-A Study on Psychometric Properties and Response Behavior.
    Iwata N; Kikuchi K; Fujihara Y
    Int J Behav Med; 2016 Aug; 23(4):427-37. PubMed ID: 26272358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.