These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2614658)

  • 21. The future of outcomes measurement: item banking, tailored short-forms, and computerized adaptive assessment.
    Cella D; Gershon R; Lai JS; Choi S
    Qual Life Res; 2007; 16 Suppl 1():133-41. PubMed ID: 17401637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A computerized adaptive test for enterprising personality assessment in youth.
    Pedrosa I; Suárez-Álvarez J; García-Cueto E; Muñiz J
    Psicothema; 2016 Nov; 28(4):471-478. PubMed ID: 27776618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A comparison of validity rates between paper-and-pencil and computerized testing with the MMPI-2.
    Blazek NL; Forbey JD
    Assessment; 2011 Mar; 18(1):63-6. PubMed ID: 20829402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Maximum information stratification method for controlling item exposure in computerized adaptive testing.
    Barrada JR; Mazuela P; Olea J
    Psicothema; 2006 Feb; 18(1):156-9. PubMed ID: 17296025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A comparison of stopping rules for computerized adaptive screening measures using the rating scale model.
    Leroux AJ; Dodd BG
    J Appl Meas; 2014; 15(3):213-26. PubMed ID: 24992246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Development of an automated performance test system for environmental and behavioral toxicology studies.
    Kennedy RS; Wilkes RL; Dunlap WP; Kuntz LA
    Percept Mot Skills; 1987 Dec; 65(3):947-62. PubMed ID: 3438142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The EORTC CAT Core-The computer adaptive version of the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire.
    Petersen MA; Aaronson NK; Arraras JI; Chie WC; Conroy T; Costantini A; Dirven L; Fayers P; Gamper EM; Giesinger JM; Habets EJJ; Hammerlid E; Helbostad J; Hjermstad MJ; Holzner B; Johnson C; Kemmler G; King MT; Kaasa S; Loge JH; Reijneveld JC; Singer S; Taphoorn MJB; Thamsborg LH; Tomaszewski KA; Velikova G; Verdonck-de Leeuw IM; Young T; Groenvold M;
    Eur J Cancer; 2018 Sep; 100():8-16. PubMed ID: 29936066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Analyzing psychopathology items: a case for nonparametric item response theory modeling.
    Meijer RR; Baneke JJ
    Psychol Methods; 2004 Sep; 9(3):354-68. PubMed ID: 15355153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Developing tailored instruments: item banking and computerized adaptive assessment.
    Bjorner JB; Chang CH; Thissen D; Reeve BB
    Qual Life Res; 2007; 16 Suppl 1():95-108. PubMed ID: 17530450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Applying computerized adaptive testing to the CES-D scale: a simulation study.
    Smits N; Cuijpers P; van Straten A
    Psychiatry Res; 2011 Jun; 188(1):147-55. PubMed ID: 21208660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Factor analytic approaches to personality item-level data.
    Panter AT; Swygert KA; Grant Dahlstrom W; Tanaka JS
    J Pers Assess; 1997 Jun; 68(3):561-89. PubMed ID: 16372867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Item response theory, computerized adaptive testing, and PROMIS: assessment of physical function.
    Fries JF; Witter J; Rose M; Cella D; Khanna D; Morgan-DeWitt E
    J Rheumatol; 2014 Jan; 41(1):153-8. PubMed ID: 24241485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. PROQSY: a computerised technique for psychiatric case identification in general practice.
    Wilkinson G; Markus AC
    Br J Psychiatry; 1989 Mar; 154():378-82. PubMed ID: 2688779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Dynamics of personality test responses: the empiricist's manifesto revisited.
    Butcher JN
    J Clin Psychol; 2000 Mar; 56(3):375-86. PubMed ID: 10726673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. An emotional functioning item bank of 24 items for computerized adaptive testing (CAT) was established.
    Petersen MA; Gamper EM; Costantini A; Giesinger JM; Holzner B; Johnson C; Sztankay M; Young T; Groenvold M;
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Feb; 70():90-100. PubMed ID: 26363341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [An IRT assessment of Rotter's I-E scale: a new approach and some considerations].
    Ferrando PJ; Demestre J; Anguiano-Carrasco C; Chico E
    Psicothema; 2011 Apr; 23(2):282-8. PubMed ID: 21504682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Self-Administered Alcoholism Screening Test: a comparison of conventional versus computer-administered formats.
    Davis LJ; Morse RM
    Alcohol Clin Exp Res; 1991 Mar; 15(2):155-7. PubMed ID: 2058787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Calibrating a new item pool to adaptively assess the Big Five.
    Nieto MD; Abad FJ; Hernández-Camacho A; Garrido LE; Barrada JR; Aguado D; Olea J
    Psicothema; 2017 Aug; 29(3):390-395. PubMed ID: 28693712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A graded response model for measuring person reliability.
    Ferrando PJ
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2009 Nov; 62(Pt 3):641-62. PubMed ID: 19159504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. An investigation of factors affecting test equating in latent trait theory.
    Suanthong S; Schumacker RE; Beyerlein MM
    J Appl Meas; 2000; 1(1):25-43. PubMed ID: 12023556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.