These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26147253)
21. The impact of genetic testing on primary care: where's the beef? Wulfsberg EA Am Fam Physician; 2000 Feb; 61(4):971-2, 974, 977-8. PubMed ID: 10706153 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Should researchers disclose results to descendants? Rothstein MA Am J Bioeth; 2013; 13(10):64-5. PubMed ID: 24024818 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. msJAMA. Genomics in medicine and public health: role of cost-effectiveness analysis. Goldie SJ; Levin AR JAMA; 2001 Oct; 286(13):1637-8. PubMed ID: 11585493 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Relationships matter: ethical considerations for returning results to family members of deceased subjects. Milner LC; Liu EY; Garrison NA Am J Bioeth; 2013; 13(10):66-7. PubMed ID: 24024819 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. The ethics of genetic screening in the workplace. Kupfer J Bus Ethics Q; 1993 Jan; 3(1):17-25. PubMed ID: 11652634 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. [Ethical requirements for genetic testing in pregnancy as well as during childhood and adolescence]. Henn W Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2008 Jan; 133(4):147-50. PubMed ID: 18197592 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Incentives for healthy behavior. Rhodes R Hastings Cent Rep; 2015; 45(3):insidebackcover. PubMed ID: 25944210 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. The moral choice: prospective mothers should have the right to select embryos on the basis of knowing as much as possible about their future health. Harris J New Sci; 2006 Jun 17-23; 190(2556):24. PubMed ID: 16862722 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Reporting genomic sequencing results to ordering clinicians: incidental, but not exceptional. Green RC; Lupski JR; Biesecker LG JAMA; 2013 Jul; 310(4):365-6. PubMed ID: 23917280 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Should insurance pay for preventive services suggested by genetics? Lawrence J Manag Care; 1997 Jan; 6(1):42-6. PubMed ID: 10164532 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. When DNA and culture clash. Kaiser J Science; 2016 Dec; 354(6317):1217-1221. PubMed ID: 27940828 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. The controversy of mapping genetics. Midwives; 2012; 15(4):18. PubMed ID: 24877265 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Misreading the genetic blueprint: implications of genetics-based population screening. Soon SL Ann R Coll Physicians Surg Can; 2002 Feb; 35(1):28-31. PubMed ID: 12755118 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Genetic privacy in employment. Resnik DB Public Aff Q; 1993 Jan; 7(1):47-56. PubMed ID: 11652102 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Clinical applications of genetic testing: implications for the family physician. Whittaker L Am Fam Physician; 1996 May; 53(6):2077-84. PubMed ID: 8623720 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Family history and genetic risk factors: forward to the future. Pyeritz RE JAMA; 1997 Oct; 278(15):1284-5. PubMed ID: 9333273 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Progress report on inherited disease research in dogs. Vet Rec; 2011 Sep; 169(12):297. PubMed ID: 21926132 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]