These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26147603)

  • 41. Stimulus coding in human associative learning: flexible representations of parts and wholes.
    Melchers KG; Shanks DR; Lachnit H
    Behav Processes; 2008 Mar; 77(3):413-27; discussion 451-3. PubMed ID: 18031954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Representations of single and compound stimuli in negative and positive patterning.
    Harris JA; Gharaei S; Moore CA
    Learn Behav; 2009 Aug; 37(3):230-45. PubMed ID: 19542090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Intermodal transfer from a visual to an auditory discrimination using an errorless learning procedure.
    Arantes J; Berg ME
    Behav Processes; 2009 Jun; 81(2):303-8. PubMed ID: 19429224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Pavlovian biconditional discrimination learning in the C57BL/6J mouse.
    Ramirez JJ; Colwill RM
    Behav Processes; 2012 Jun; 90(2):278-86. PubMed ID: 22465263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Differential outcomes aid the formation of categorical relationships between stimuli.
    Easton A; Child S; Lopez-Crespo G
    Behav Brain Res; 2011 Sep; 222(1):270-3. PubMed ID: 21440010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. The impact of reinforcement density on response differentiation in configural discrimination problems.
    Lachnit H; Lober K; Reinhard G; Giurfa M
    Psychophysiology; 2002 Sep; 39(5):650-6. PubMed ID: 12236332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Some properties of configural learning: an investigation of the transverse-patterning problem.
    Alvarado MC; Rudy JW
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1992 Apr; 18(2):145-53. PubMed ID: 1583444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. The utility of the transverse patterning task as a measure of configural learning in a college sample.
    Carlozzi NE; Thomas DG
    Appl Neuropsychol; 2008; 15(1):54-60. PubMed ID: 18443941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Summation in causal learning: elemental processing or configural generalization?
    Collins DJ; Shanks DR
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2006 Sep; 59(9):1524-34. PubMed ID: 16873106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Evidence for the utilization of distinctive features in nonlinear discrimination problems.
    Reinhard G; Lachnit H
    Biol Psychol; 2002 Nov; 61(3):277-92. PubMed ID: 12406611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Ontogeny of the capacity to compare discrete quantities in fish.
    Miletto Petrazzini ME; Agrillo C; Piffer L; Bisazza A
    Dev Psychobiol; 2014 Apr; 56(3):529-36. PubMed ID: 23775761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Fruit flies can learn non-elemental olfactory discriminations.
    Durrieu M; Wystrach A; Arrufat P; Giurfa M; Isabel G
    Proc Biol Sci; 2020 Nov; 287(1938):20201234. PubMed ID: 33171086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Prestimulus oscillations in the alpha band of the EEG are modulated by the difficulty of feature discrimination and predict activation of a sensory discrimination process.
    Roberts DM; Fedota JR; Buzzell GA; Parasuraman R; McDonald CG
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2014 Aug; 26(8):1615-28. PubMed ID: 24405187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Multimodal discrimination learning in humans: evidence for configural theory.
    Redhead ES
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2007 Nov; 60(11):1477-95. PubMed ID: 17853209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Outcome maximality and additivity training also influence cue competition in causal learning when learning involves many cues and events.
    Vandorpe S; De Houwer J; Beckers T
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2007 Mar; 60(3):356-68. PubMed ID: 17366305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Conditions favoring superconditioning of irrelevant conditioned stimuli.
    Williams DA; Mehta R; Dumont JL
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2004 Apr; 30(2):148-59. PubMed ID: 15078124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Categorization of biologically significant objects, food and gender, in rhesus monkeys. I. Behavioral study.
    Inoue T; Hasegawa T; Takara S; Lukáts B; Mizuno M; Aou S
    Neurosci Res; 2008 May; 61(1):70-8. PubMed ID: 18329121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Limited attention and cue order consistency affect predictive learning: a test of similarity measures.
    Young ME; Wasserman EA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2002 May; 28(3):484-96. PubMed ID: 12018500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Asymmetric interference in patterning discriminations: a case of modulated attention.
    Ludwig I; Lachnit H
    Biol Psychol; 2003 Feb; 62(2):133-46. PubMed ID: 12581688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Contextual control of biconditional task performance: evidence for cue and response competition in rats.
    Haddon JE; George DN; Killcross S
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2008 Sep; 61(9):1307-20. PubMed ID: 19086300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.