BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

318 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26148694)

  • 1. Patient-specific instrument can achieve same accuracy with less resection time than navigation assistance in periacetabular pelvic tumor surgery: a cadaveric study.
    Wong KC; Sze KY; Wong IO; Wong CM; Kumta SM
    Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2016 Feb; 11(2):307-16. PubMed ID: 26148694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Are Skin Fiducials Comparable to Bone Fiducials for Registration When Planning Navigation-assisted Musculoskeletal Tumor Resections in a Cadaveric Simulated Tumor Model?
    Zamora R; Punt SE; Christman-Skieller C; Yildirim C; Shapton JC; Conrad EU
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2019 Dec; 477(12):2692-2701. PubMed ID: 31764337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Can Augmented Reality Be Helpful in Pelvic Bone Cancer Surgery? An In Vitro Study.
    Cho HS; Park MS; Gupta S; Han I; Kim HS; Choi H; Hong J
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2018 Sep; 476(9):1719-1725. PubMed ID: 30794209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Navigated pelvic osteotomy and tumor resection: a study assessing the accuracy and reproducibility of resection planes in Sawbones and cadavers.
    Sternheim A; Daly M; Qiu J; Weersink R; Chan H; Jaffray D; Irish JC; Ferguson PC; Wunder JS
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2015 Jan; 97(1):40-6. PubMed ID: 25568393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. One-step reconstruction with a 3D-printed, biomechanically evaluated custom implant after complex pelvic tumor resection.
    Wong KC; Kumta SM; Geel NV; Demol J
    Comput Aided Surg; 2015; 20(1):14-23. PubMed ID: 26290317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Can Navigation-assisted Surgery Help Achieve Negative Margins in Resection of Pelvic and Sacral Tumors?
    Abraham JA; Kenneally B; Amer K; Geller DS
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2018 Mar; 476(3):499-508. PubMed ID: 29529631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Improved accuracy with 3D planning and patient-specific instruments during simulated pelvic bone tumor surgery.
    Cartiaux O; Paul L; Francq BG; Banse X; Docquier PL
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2014 Jan; 42(1):205-13. PubMed ID: 23963884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Can Navigation Improve the Ability to Achieve Tumor-free Margins in Pelvic and Sacral Primary Bone Sarcoma Resections? A Historically Controlled Study.
    Bosma SE; Cleven AHG; Dijkstra PDS
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2019 Jul; 477(7):1548-1559. PubMed ID: 31107331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Resection margins obtained with patient-specific instruments for resecting primary pelvic bone sarcomas: A case-control study.
    Evrard R; Schubert T; Paul L; Docquier PL
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2019 Jun; 105(4):781-787. PubMed ID: 30982774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An evaluation of three-dimensional image-guided technologies in percutaneous pelvic and acetabular lag screw placement.
    Xu P; Wang H; Liu ZY; Mu WD; Xu SH; Wang LB; Chen C; Cavanaugh JM
    J Surg Res; 2013 Nov; 185(1):338-46. PubMed ID: 23830362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Is computer navigation when used in the surgery of iliosacral pelvic bone tumours safer for the patient?
    Laitinen MK; Parry MC; Albergo JI; Grimer RJ; Jeys LM
    Bone Joint J; 2017 Feb; 99-B(2):261-266. PubMed ID: 28148671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Computer-assisted virtual preoperative planning in orthopedic surgery for acetabular fractures based on actual computed tomography data.
    Wang GY; Huang WJ; Song Q; Qin YT; Liang JF
    Comput Assist Surg (Abingdon); 2016 Dec; 21(1):160-165. PubMed ID: 27973962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Potential accuracy of navigated K-wire guided supra-acetabular osteotomies in orthopedic surgery: a CT fluoroscopy cadaver study.
    Postl LK; Kirchhoff C; Toepfer A; Kirchhoff S; Schmitt-Sody M; von Eisenhart-Rothe R; Burgkart R
    Int J Med Robot; 2017 Jun; 13(2):. PubMed ID: 27273244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. What Is the Expected Learning Curve in Computer-assisted Navigation for Bone Tumor Resection?
    Farfalli GL; Albergo JI; Ritacco LE; Ayerza MA; Milano FE; Aponte-Tinao LA
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2017 Mar; 475(3):668-675. PubMed ID: 26913513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Computer-assisted planning and navigation improves cutting accuracy during simulated bone tumor surgery of the pelvis.
    Cartiaux O; Banse X; Paul L; Francq BG; Aubin CÉ; Docquier PL
    Comput Aided Surg; 2013; 18(1-2):19-26. PubMed ID: 23176154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The role of Intraoperative 3D navigation for pelvic bone tumor resection.
    Ould-Slimane M; Thong P; Perez A; Roussignol X; Dujardin FH
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2016 Oct; 102(6):807-11. PubMed ID: 27318805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Is It Possible and Safe to Perform Acetabular-preserving Resections for Malignant Neoplasms of the Periacetabular Region?
    Lam YL; Yau R; Ho KW; Mak KL; Fong ST; So TY
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2017 Mar; 475(3):656-665. PubMed ID: 27020433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Image guidance in pelvic and acetabular surgery--expectations, success and limitations.
    Stöckle U; Schaser K; König B
    Injury; 2007 Apr; 38(4):450-62. PubMed ID: 17403522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clinical applications--pelvis.
    Stöckle U; Krettek C; Pohlemann T; Messmer P
    Injury; 2004 Jun; 35 Suppl 1():S-A46-56. PubMed ID: 15183703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Acetabular Reconstruction With Femoral Head Autograft After Intraarticular Resection of Periacetabular Tumors is Durable at Short-term Followup.
    Tang X; Guo W; Yang R; Yan T; Tang S; Li D
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2017 Dec; 475(12):3060-3070. PubMed ID: 28948491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.