These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

90 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26151604)

  • 1. How Attention Changes in Response to Incentives.
    Sawaki R; Luck SJ; Raymond JE
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2015 Nov; 27(11):2229-39. PubMed ID: 26151604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cortical Brain Activity Reflecting Attentional Biasing Toward Reward-Predicting Cues Covaries with Economic Decision-Making Performance.
    San Martín R; Appelbaum LG; Huettel SA; Woldorff MG
    Cereb Cortex; 2016 Jan; 26(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 25139941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Age-Related Differences in Motivational Integration and Cognitive Control.
    Yee DM; Adams S; Beck A; Braver TS
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2019 Jun; 19(3):692-714. PubMed ID: 30980339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Why creatives don't find the oddball odd: Neural and psychological evidence for atypical salience processing.
    Gross ME; Elliott JC; Schooler JW
    Brain Cogn; 2024 Aug; 178():106178. PubMed ID: 38823196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Electrophysiological signature of the interplay between habits and inhibition in response to smoking-related cues in individuals with a smoking habit: An event-related potential study.
    Dampuré J; Agudelo-Orjuela P; van der Meij M; Belin D; Barber HA
    Eur J Neurosci; 2023 Apr; 57(8):1335-1352. PubMed ID: 36829295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of reward and punishment on the interaction between going and stopping in a selective stop-change task.
    Verbruggen F; McLaren R
    Psychol Res; 2018 Mar; 82(2):353-370. PubMed ID: 27888354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effort discounts reward-based control allocation: A neurodynamic perspective.
    Zheng Y; Zhang M; Wu M
    Psychophysiology; 2024 Feb; 61(2):e14451. PubMed ID: 37789510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Brain's Sensitivity to Real-world Statistical Regularity Does Not Require Full Attention.
    Center EG; Federmeier KD; Beck DM
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2024 Jul; 36(8):1715-1740. PubMed ID: 38739561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Distractor Positivity Component and the Inhibition of Distracting Stimuli.
    Gaspelin N; Lamy D; Egeth HE; Liesefeld HR; Kerzel D; Mandal A; Müller MM; Schall JD; Schubö A; Slagter HA; Stilwell BT; van Moorselaar D
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2023 Nov; 35(11):1693-1715. PubMed ID: 37677060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Test conditions impact measures of visual, perceptual, and cognitive performance.
    Wilkins L
    Ergonomics; 2024 Apr; ():1-12. PubMed ID: 38661125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Attention Drives Visual Processing and Audiovisual Integration During Multimodal Communication.
    Seijdel N; Schoffelen JM; Hagoort P; Drijvers L
    J Neurosci; 2024 Mar; 44(10):. PubMed ID: 38199864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Differential effects of intra-modal and cross-modal reward value on perception: ERP evidence.
    Vakhrushev R; Cheng FP; Schacht A; Pooresmaeili A
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(6):e0287900. PubMed ID: 37390067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of top-down and bottom-up attention on post-selection posterior contralateral negativity.
    Rashal E; Santandrea E; Ben-Hamed S; Macaluso E; Chelazzi L; Boehler CN
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2023 Apr; 85(3):705-717. PubMed ID: 36788197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. On the Influence of Spatial and Value Attentional Cues Across Individuals.
    Garner KG; Lovell-Kane M; Carroll L; Dux PE
    J Cogn; 2022; 5(1):38. PubMed ID: 36072117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Task prioritization modulates alpha, theta and beta EEG dynamics reflecting proactive cognitive control.
    Liegel N; Schneider D; Wascher E; Arnau S
    Sci Rep; 2022 Sep; 12(1):15072. PubMed ID: 36064572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Testing reward-cue attentional salience: Attainment and dynamic changes.
    De Tommaso M; Turatto M
    Br J Psychol; 2022 May; 113(2):396-411. PubMed ID: 34708867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Temporal Dynamics of the Neural Representation of Social Relationships.
    Dziura SL; Thompson JC
    J Neurosci; 2020 Nov; 40(47):9078-9087. PubMed ID: 33067364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Different temporal dynamics of object-based attentional allocation for reward and non-reward objects.
    Song F; Zhou S; Gao Y; Hu S; Kong F; Zhao J
    J Vis; 2020 Sep; 20(9):17. PubMed ID: 32976595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Learning to avoid looking: Competing influences of reward on overt attentional selection.
    Pearson D; Le Pelley ME
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2020 Oct; 27(5):998-1005. PubMed ID: 32607848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Attentional Orienting by Non-informative Cue Is Shaped via Reinforcement Learning.
    Cho SA; Cho YS
    Front Psychol; 2019; 10():2884. PubMed ID: 32010011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.