These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26151876)

  • 1. POSIT: Flexible Shape-Guided Docking For Pose Prediction.
    Kelley BP; Brown SP; Warren GL; Muchmore SW
    J Chem Inf Model; 2015 Aug; 55(8):1771-80. PubMed ID: 26151876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Use of experimental design to optimize docking performance: the case of LiGenDock, the docking module of LiGen, a new de novo design program.
    Beato C; Beccari AR; Cavazzoni C; Lorenzi S; Costantino G
    J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Jun; 53(6):1503-17. PubMed ID: 23590204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Knowledge-Based Strategy to Improve Ligand Pose Prediction Accuracy for Lead Optimization.
    Gao C; Thorsteinson N; Watson I; Wang J; Vieth M
    J Chem Inf Model; 2015 Jul; 55(7):1460-8. PubMed ID: 26090547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Importance of molecular computer modeling in anticancer drug development.
    Geromichalos GD
    J BUON; 2007 Sep; 12 Suppl 1():S101-18. PubMed ID: 17935268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A pose prediction approach based on ligand 3D shape similarity.
    Kumar A; Zhang KY
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2016 Jun; 30(6):457-69. PubMed ID: 27379501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Performance of multiple docking and refinement methods in the pose prediction D3R prospective Grand Challenge 2016.
    Fradera X; Verras A; Hu Y; Wang D; Wang H; Fells JI; Armacost KA; Crespo A; Sherborne B; Wang H; Peng Z; Gao YD
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2018 Jan; 32(1):113-127. PubMed ID: 28913710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Incorporating backbone flexibility in MedusaDock improves ligand-binding pose prediction in the CSAR2011 docking benchmark.
    Ding F; Dokholyan NV
    J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Aug; 53(8):1871-9. PubMed ID: 23237273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Continuous Evaluation of Ligand Protein Predictions: A Weekly Community Challenge for Drug Docking.
    Wagner JR; Churas CP; Liu S; Swift RV; Chiu M; Shao C; Feher VA; Burley SK; Gilson MK; Amaro RE
    Structure; 2019 Aug; 27(8):1326-1335.e4. PubMed ID: 31257108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Accurate and reliable prediction of relative ligand binding potency in prospective drug discovery by way of a modern free-energy calculation protocol and force field.
    Wang L; Wu Y; Deng Y; Kim B; Pierce L; Krilov G; Lupyan D; Robinson S; Dahlgren MK; Greenwood J; Romero DL; Masse C; Knight JL; Steinbrecher T; Beuming T; Damm W; Harder E; Sherman W; Brewer M; Wester R; Murcko M; Frye L; Farid R; Lin T; Mobley DL; Jorgensen WL; Berne BJ; Friesner RA; Abel R
    J Am Chem Soc; 2015 Feb; 137(7):2695-703. PubMed ID: 25625324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Improving docking results via reranking of ensembles of ligand poses in multiple X-ray protein conformations with MM-GBSA.
    Greenidge PA; Kramer C; Mozziconacci JC; Sherman W
    J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Oct; 54(10):2697-717. PubMed ID: 25266271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. HarmonyDOCK: the structural analysis of poses in protein-ligand docking.
    Plewczynski D; Philips A; Von Grotthuss M; Rychlewski L; Ginalski K
    J Comput Biol; 2014 Mar; 21(3):247-56. PubMed ID: 21091053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Binding affinity prediction for protein-ligand complexes based on β contacts and B factor.
    Liu Q; Kwoh CK; Li J
    J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Nov; 53(11):3076-85. PubMed ID: 24191692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. FlexE: efficient molecular docking considering protein structure variations.
    Claussen H; Buning C; Rarey M; Lengauer T
    J Mol Biol; 2001 Apr; 308(2):377-95. PubMed ID: 11327774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Multiple structures for virtual ligand screening: defining binding site properties-based criteria to optimize the selection of the query.
    Ben Nasr N; Guillemain H; Lagarde N; Zagury JF; Montes M
    J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Feb; 53(2):293-311. PubMed ID: 23312043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Docking ligands into flexible and solvated macromolecules. 7. Impact of protein flexibility and water molecules on docking-based virtual screening accuracy.
    Therrien E; Weill N; Tomberg A; Corbeil CR; Lee D; Moitessier N
    J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Nov; 54(11):3198-210. PubMed ID: 25280064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. ParaDockS: a framework for molecular docking with population-based metaheuristics.
    Meier R; Pippel M; Brandt F; Sippl W; Baldauf C
    J Chem Inf Model; 2010 May; 50(5):879-89. PubMed ID: 20415499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Protein-ligand docking using fitness learning-based artificial bee colony with proximity stimuli.
    Uehara S; Fujimoto KJ; Tanaka S
    Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2015 Jul; 17(25):16412-7. PubMed ID: 26050878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Nonlinear scoring functions for similarity-based ligand docking and binding affinity prediction.
    Brylinski M
    J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Nov; 53(11):3097-112. PubMed ID: 24171431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Open challenges in structure-based virtual screening: Receptor modeling, target flexibility consideration and active site water molecules description.
    Spyrakis F; Cavasotto CN
    Arch Biochem Biophys; 2015 Oct; 583():105-19. PubMed ID: 26271444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Facing the challenges of structure-based target prediction by inverse virtual screening.
    Schomburg KT; Bietz S; Briem H; Henzler AM; Urbaczek S; Rarey M
    J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Jun; 54(6):1676-86. PubMed ID: 24851945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.