These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26151983)

  • 1. Sexual Stimulation and Sexual Selection.
    Symes LB; Price TD
    Am Nat; 2015 Apr; 185(4):iii-iv. PubMed ID: 26151983
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Artificial selection reveals sex differences in the genetic basis of sexual attractiveness.
    Gosden TP; Reddiex AJ; Chenoweth SF
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2018 May; 115(21):5498-5503. PubMed ID: 29735676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Direct selection of female mating preferences: comments on Grafen's models.
    Kirkpatrick M
    J Theor Biol; 1992 Jan; 154(1):127-9. PubMed ID: 1573900
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sexual selection can constrain sympatric speciation.
    Kirkpatrick M; Nuismer SL
    Proc Biol Sci; 2004 Apr; 271(1540):687-93. PubMed ID: 15209101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Fisher's sons' effect in sexual selection: absent, intermittent or just low experimental power?
    Sharma MD; Wilson AJ; Hosken DJ
    J Evol Biol; 2016 Dec; 29(12):2464-2470. PubMed ID: 27575647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Testing for a genetic response to sexual selection in a wild Drosophila population.
    Gosden TP; Thomson JR; Blows MW; Schaul A; Chenoweth SF
    J Evol Biol; 2016 Jun; 29(6):1278-83. PubMed ID: 26914275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evolution of mating preference and sexual dimorphism.
    Lande R; Arnold SJ
    J Theor Biol; 1985 Dec; 117(4):651-64. PubMed ID: 4094458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The evolution of costly mate choice against segregation distorters.
    Manser A; Lindholm AK; Weissing FJ
    Evolution; 2017 Dec; 71(12):2817-2828. PubMed ID: 29071709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The role of genes and environment in the phenotypic expression of alternative mating tactics: a reply to Buzatto et al.
    Neff BD; Svensson EI
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2014 May; 369(1642):20140052. PubMed ID: 24818300
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Repetition of Bateman challenges the paradigm.
    Tang-Martínez Z
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2012 Jul; 109(29):11476-7. PubMed ID: 22773808
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Animal behaviour: Why promiscuity pays.
    Bellamy L; Pomiankowski A
    Nature; 2011 Nov; 479(7372):184-6. PubMed ID: 22071760
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A theoretical muddle of the conditional strategy: a comment on Neff and Svensson.
    Buzatto BA; Hazel WN; Tomkins JL
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2014 May; 369(1642):20130625. PubMed ID: 24686942
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Measuring sexual selection on females in sex-role-reversed Mormon crickets (Anabrus simplex, Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae).
    Robson LJ; Gwynne DT
    J Evol Biol; 2010 Jul; 23(7):1528-37. PubMed ID: 20524949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sexual selection and the risk of extinction in birds.
    Morrow EH; Pitcher TE
    Proc Biol Sci; 2003 Sep; 270(1526):1793-9. PubMed ID: 12964981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Opportunity for Post-Copulatory Sexual Selection in the Ectoparasitic Pea Crab, Dissodactylus primitivus (Brachyura: Pinnotheridae).
    Prather RB; Shuster SM
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(12):e0145681. PubMed ID: 26701316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Mating systems and sexual selection in male-pregnant pipefishes and seahorses: insights from microsatellite-based studies of maternity.
    Jones AG; Avise JC
    J Hered; 2001; 92(2):150-8. PubMed ID: 11396573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluating the post-copulatory sexual selection hypothesis for genital evolution reveals evidence for pleiotropic harm exerted by the male genital spines of Drosophila ananassae.
    Grieshop K; Polak M
    J Evol Biol; 2014 Dec; 27(12):2676-86. PubMed ID: 25403358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evolution of MHC genetic diversity: a tale of incest, pestilence and sexual preference.
    Potts WK; Wakeland EK
    Trends Genet; 1993 Dec; 9(12):408-12. PubMed ID: 8122307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Bateman in nature: predation on offspring reduces the potential for sexual selection.
    Byers J; Dunn S
    Science; 2012 Nov; 338(6108):802-4. PubMed ID: 23139332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Proximity of signallers can maintain sexual signal variation under stabilizing selection.
    van Wijk M; Heath J; Lievers R; Schal C; Groot AT
    Sci Rep; 2017 Dec; 7(1):18101. PubMed ID: 29273813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.