119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26152903)
1. Does carbon reduction increase sustainability? A study in wastewater treatment.
Sweetapple C; Fu G; Butler D
Water Res; 2015 Dec; 87():522-30. PubMed ID: 26152903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor--a review.
Bal AS; Dhagat NN
Indian J Environ Health; 2001 Apr; 43(2):1-82. PubMed ID: 12397675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Multi-objective optimisation of wastewater treatment plant control to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.
Sweetapple C; Fu G; Butler D
Water Res; 2014 May; 55():52-62. PubMed ID: 24602860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Environmental sustainability of an energy self-sufficient sewage treatment plant: improvements through DEMON and co-digestion.
Schaubroeck T; De Clippeleir H; Weissenbacher N; Dewulf J; Boeckx P; Vlaeminck SE; Wett B
Water Res; 2015 May; 74():166-79. PubMed ID: 25727156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Balancing effluent quality, economic cost and greenhouse gas emissions during the evaluation of (plant-wide) control/operational strategies in WWTPs.
Flores-Alsina X; Arnell M; Amerlinck Y; Corominas L; Gernaey KV; Guo L; Lindblom E; Nopens I; Porro J; Shaw A; Snip L; Vanrolleghem PA; Jeppsson U
Sci Total Environ; 2014 Jan; 466-467():616-24. PubMed ID: 23959217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Navigating environmental, economic, and technological trade-offs in the design and operation of submerged anaerobic membrane bioreactors (AnMBRs).
Pretel R; Shoener BD; Ferrer J; Guest JS
Water Res; 2015 Dec; 87():531-41. PubMed ID: 26206622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Options to reduce greenhouse gas emissions during wastewater treatment for agricultural use.
Fine P; Hadas E
Sci Total Environ; 2012 Feb; 416():289-99. PubMed ID: 22209373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Identifying energy and carbon footprint optimization potentials of a sludge treatment line with Life Cycle Assessment.
Remy C; Lesjean B; Waschnewski J
Water Sci Technol; 2013; 67(1):63-73. PubMed ID: 23128622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Greenhouse gas production in wastewater treatment: process selection is the major factor.
Keller J; Hartley K
Water Sci Technol; 2003; 47(12):43-8. PubMed ID: 12926668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Mass and energy balances of sludge processing in reference and upgraded wastewater treatment plants.
Mininni G; Laera G; Bertanza G; Canato M; Sbrilli A
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2015 May; 22(10):7203-15. PubMed ID: 25598155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Alternatives for energy production in aerobic wastewater treatment facilities.
Velasquez-Orta SB
Water Sci Technol; 2013; 67(12):2856-62. PubMed ID: 23787329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Can municipal wastewater treatment systems be carbon neutral?
Mo W; Zhang Q
J Environ Manage; 2012 Dec; 112():360-7. PubMed ID: 22964043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Using bioprocess stoichiometry to build a plant-wide mass balance based steady-state WWTP model.
Ekama GA
Water Res; 2009 May; 43(8):2101-20. PubMed ID: 19345392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Sustainability and energy development: influences of greenhouse gas emission reduction options on water use in energy production.
Cooper DC; Sehlke G
Environ Sci Technol; 2012 Mar; 46(6):3509-18. PubMed ID: 22283709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effect of primary sedimentation on full-scale WWTP nutrient removal performance.
Puig S; van Loosdrecht MC; Flameling AG; Colprim J; Meijer SC
Water Res; 2010 Jun; 44(11):3375-84. PubMed ID: 20430413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The potential of bio-methane as bio-fuel/bio-energy for reducing greenhouse gas emissions: a qualitative assessment for Europe in a life cycle perspective.
Tilche A; Galatola M
Water Sci Technol; 2008; 57(11):1683-92. PubMed ID: 18547917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comprehensive life cycle inventories of alternative wastewater treatment systems.
Foley J; de Haas D; Hartley K; Lant P
Water Res; 2010 Mar; 44(5):1654-66. PubMed ID: 20022351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Ultrasonic reduction of excess sludge from activated sludge system II: urban sewage treatment.
Zhang G; He J; Zhang P; Zhang J
J Hazard Mater; 2009 May; 164(2-3):1105-9. PubMed ID: 18926629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Including greenhouse gas emissions during benchmarking of wastewater treatment plant control strategies.
Flores-Alsina X; Corominas L; Snip L; Vanrolleghem PA
Water Res; 2011 Oct; 45(16):4700-10. PubMed ID: 21851960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Application of vibration milling for advanced wastewater treatment and excess sludge reduction.
Sano A; Senga A; Yamazaki H; Inoue H; Xu KQ; Inamori Y
Water Sci Technol; 2012; 65(1):142-8. PubMed ID: 22173418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
