172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26153415)
1. Stimulus Frequency Otoacoustic Emissions Provide No Evidence for the Role of Efferents in the Enhancement Effect.
Beim JA; Elliott M; Oxenham AJ; Wojtczak M
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2015 Oct; 16(5):613-29. PubMed ID: 26153415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Efferent-mediated reduction in cochlear gain does not alter tuning estimates from stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emission group delays.
Bhagat SP; Kilgore C
Neurosci Lett; 2014 Jan; 559():132-5. PubMed ID: 24333175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Electrically Evoked Medial Olivocochlear Efferent Effects on Stimulus Frequency Otoacoustic Emissions in Guinea Pigs.
Berezina-Greene MA; Guinan JJ
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2017 Feb; 18(1):153-163. PubMed ID: 27798720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Frequency specificity and left-ear advantage of medial olivocochlear efferent modulation: a study based on stimulus frequency otoacoustic emission.
Xing D; Gong Q
Neuroreport; 2017 Sep; 28(13):775-778. PubMed ID: 28538522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Medial olivocochlear efferent reflex in humans: otoacoustic emission (OAE) measurement issues and the advantages of stimulus frequency OAEs.
Guinan JJ; Backus BC; Lilaonitkul W; Aharonson V
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2003 Dec; 4(4):521-40. PubMed ID: 12799992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Suppression of stimulus frequency otoacoustic emissions by contralateral noise.
Souter M
Hear Res; 1995 Nov; 91(1-2):167-77. PubMed ID: 8647718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Acoustic stimulation of human medial olivocochlear efferents reduces stimulus-frequency and click-evoked otoacoustic emission delays: Implications for cochlear filter bandwidths.
Francis NA; Guinan JJ
Hear Res; 2010 Aug; 267(1-2):36-45. PubMed ID: 20430088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Measurement of medial olivocochlear efferent activity in humans: comparison of different distortion product otoacoustic emission-based paradigms.
Wagner W; Heyd A
Otol Neurotol; 2011 Oct; 32(8):1379-88. PubMed ID: 21921859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Auditory efferents facilitate sound localization in noise in humans.
Andéol G; Guillaume A; Micheyl C; Savel S; Pellieux L; Moulin A
J Neurosci; 2011 May; 31(18):6759-63. PubMed ID: 21543605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Musical experience sharpens human cochlear tuning.
Bidelman GM; Nelms C; Bhagat SP
Hear Res; 2016 May; 335():40-46. PubMed ID: 26900073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Efferent Modulation of Stimulus Frequency Otoacoustic Emission Fine Structure.
Zhao W; Dewey JB; Boothalingam S; Dhar S
Front Syst Neurosci; 2015; 9():168. PubMed ID: 26696843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Olivocochlear efferents: anatomy, physiology, function, and the measurement of efferent effects in humans.
Guinan JJ
Ear Hear; 2006 Dec; 27(6):589-607. PubMed ID: 17086072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Simultaneous measurement of noise-activated middle-ear muscle reflex and stimulus frequency otoacoustic emissions.
Goodman SS; Keefe DH
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2006 Jun; 7(2):125-39. PubMed ID: 16568366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Subclinical dysfunction of cochlea and cochlear efferents in migraine: an otoacoustic emission study.
Bolay H; Bayazit YA; Gündüz B; Ugur AK; Akçali D; Altunyay S; Ilica S; Babacan A
Cephalalgia; 2008 Apr; 28(4):309-17. PubMed ID: 18279433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Changes in spontaneous otoacoustic emissions produced by acoustic stimulation of the contralateral ear.
Mott JB; Norton SJ; Neely ST; Warr WB
Hear Res; 1989 Apr; 38(3):229-42. PubMed ID: 2708165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects of contralateral acoustic stimulation on otoacoustic emissions induced by swept tones.
Shixiong Chen ; Yanbing Jin ; Lisheng Xu ; Guanglin Li
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2015 Aug; 2015():2733-6. PubMed ID: 26736857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Use of stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions to investigate efferent and cochlear contributions to temporal overshoot.
Keefe DH; Schairer KS; Ellison JC; Fitzpatrick DF; Jesteadt W
J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Mar; 125(3):1595-604. PubMed ID: 19275317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Experimental and clinical aspects of the efferent auditory system.
Di Girolamo S; Napolitano B; Alessandrini M; Bruno E
Acta Neurochir Suppl; 2007; 97(Pt 2):419-24. PubMed ID: 17691330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A parametric model of the spectral periodicity of stimulus frequency otoacoustic emissions.
Lineton B; Lutman ME
J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Aug; 114(2):883-95. PubMed ID: 12942970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Frequency Tuning of the Efferent Effect on Cochlear Gain in Humans.
Drga V; Plack CJ; Yasin I
Adv Exp Med Biol; 2016; 894():477-484. PubMed ID: 27080689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
