190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26153659)
1. On the costs and benefits of repeating a nonspatial feature in an exogenous spatial cuing paradigm.
Klein RM; Wang Y; Dukewich KR; He S; Hu K
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Oct; 77(7):2293-304. PubMed ID: 26153659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cue and target processing modulate the onset of inhibition of return.
Gabay S; Chica AB; Charras P; Funes MJ; Henik A
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Feb; 38(1):42-52. PubMed ID: 21553993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Task-dependent exogenous cuing effects depend on cue modality.
van der Lubbe RH; Havik MM; Bekker EM; Postma A
Psychophysiology; 2006 Mar; 43(2):145-60. PubMed ID: 16712585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Orienting of attention, pupil size, and the norepinephrine system.
Gabay S; Pertzov Y; Henik A
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Jan; 73(1):123-9. PubMed ID: 21258914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Inhibition of return and repetition priming effects in localization and discrimination tasks.
Taylor TL; Ivanoff J
Can J Exp Psychol; 2005 Jun; 59(2):75-89. PubMed ID: 16035342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cross-modal nonspatial repetition inhibition.
Wang L; Yue Z; Chen Q
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Jul; 74(5):867-78. PubMed ID: 22415447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Does cue processing modulate inhibition of return in a detection task?
Zhou B; Yang T; Bao Y
Psych J; 2019 Mar; 8(1):158-164. PubMed ID: 30375191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Spatial attention triggered by unimodal, crossmodal, and bimodal exogenous cues: a comparison of reflexive orienting mechanisms.
Santangelo V; Van der Lubbe RH; Belardinelli MO; Postma A
Exp Brain Res; 2006 Aug; 173(1):40-8. PubMed ID: 16489435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Inhibition of return and response repetition within and between modalities.
Roggeveen AB; Prime DJ; Ward LM
Exp Brain Res; 2005 Nov; 167(1):86-94. PubMed ID: 16049684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Inhibition of return and attentional control settings.
Gibson BS; Amelio J
Percept Psychophys; 2000 Apr; 62(3):496-504. PubMed ID: 10909240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Detection cost: A nonnegligible factor contributing to inhibition of return in the discrimination task under the cue-target paradigm.
Zhang M; Zu G; Wang A
Perception; 2023 Oct; 52(10):681-694. PubMed ID: 37525928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The effects of implicit attentional learning and habituation on inhibition of return.
Wolf K; Ebeling D; Müller NG
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Jan; 71(1):26-41. PubMed ID: 19304594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Temporal ambiguity of onsets in a cueing task prevents facilitation but not inhibition of return.
Malevich T; Ardasheva L; Krüger HM; MacInnes WJ
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Jan; 80(1):106-117. PubMed ID: 29075992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The involvement of bottom-up saliency processing in endogenous inhibition of return.
Henderickx D; Maetens K; Soetens E
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Feb; 74(2):285-99. PubMed ID: 22038667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Examining the time course of facilitation and inhibition with simultaneous onset and offset cues.
Pratt J; Hirshhorn M
Psychol Res; 2003 Nov; 67(4):261-5. PubMed ID: 14634813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Inhibition of return in aging and Alzheimer's disease: performance as a function of task demands and stimulus timing.
Langley LK; Fuentes LJ; Hochhalter AK; Brandt J; Overmier JB
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2001 Aug; 23(4):431-46. PubMed ID: 11780944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. On the spatial metric of short-SOA costs of exogenous cuing.
Chen P; Moore C; Mordkoff JT
Am J Psychol; 2008; 121(2):229-40. PubMed ID: 18510134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Salience drives non-spatial feature repetition effects in cueing tasks.
Huffman G; Al-Aidroos N; Pratt J
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Jan; 79(1):212-222. PubMed ID: 27743261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. On the uniqueness of attentional capture by uninformative gaze cues: facilitation interacts with the Simon effect and is rarely followed by IOR.
McKee D; Christie J; Klein R
Can J Exp Psychol; 2007 Dec; 61(4):293-303. PubMed ID: 18266505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Task dependent modulation of exogenous attention: effects of target duration and intervening events.
Martín-Arévalo E; Chica AB; Lupiáñez J
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2013 Aug; 75(6):1148-60. PubMed ID: 23709067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
