193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26154258)
1. [Who Hits the Mark? A Comparative Study of the Free Geocoding Services of Google and OpenStreetMap].
Lemke D; Mattauch V; Heidinger O; Hense HW
Gesundheitswesen; 2015 Sep; 77(8-9):e160-5. PubMed ID: 26154258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Accuracy of two geocoding methods for geographic information system-based exposure assessment in epidemiological studies.
Faure E; Danjou AM; Clavel-Chapelon F; Boutron-Ruault MC; Dossus L; Fervers B
Environ Health; 2017 Feb; 16(1):15. PubMed ID: 28235407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of the positional difference between two common geocoding methods.
Duncan DT; Castro MC; Blossom JC; Bennett GG; Gortmaker SL
Geospat Health; 2011 May; 5(2):265-73. PubMed ID: 21590677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Match rate and positional accuracy of two geocoding methods for epidemiologic research.
Zhan FB; Brender JD; De Lima I; Suarez L; Langlois PH
Ann Epidemiol; 2006 Nov; 16(11):842-9. PubMed ID: 17027286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Positional accuracy of geocoded addresses in epidemiologic research.
Bonner MR; Han D; Nie J; Rogerson P; Vena JE; Freudenheim JL
Epidemiology; 2003 Jul; 14(4):408-12. PubMed ID: 12843763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Positional accuracy of geocoding from residential postal codes versus full street addresses.
Khan S; Pinault L; Tjepkema M; Wilkins R
Health Rep; 2018 Feb; 29(2):3-9. PubMed ID: 29465738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Geocoding rural addresses in a community contaminated by PFOA: a comparison of methods.
Vieira VM; Howard GJ; Gallagher LG; Fletcher T
Environ Health; 2010 Apr; 9():18. PubMed ID: 20406495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Smartphone-assisted spatial data collection improves geographic information quality: pilot study using a birth records dataset.
Xu X; Hu H; Ha S; Han D
Geospat Health; 2016 Nov; 11(3):482. PubMed ID: 27903063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Positional error in automated geocoding of residential addresses.
Cayo MR; Talbot TO
Int J Health Geogr; 2003 Dec; 2(1):10. PubMed ID: 14687425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Accuracy of residential geocoding in the Agricultural Health Study.
Jones RR; DellaValle CT; Flory AR; Nordan A; Hoppin JA; Hofmann JN; Chen H; Giglierano J; Lynch CF; Beane Freeman LE; Rushton G; Ward MH
Int J Health Geogr; 2014 Oct; 13():37. PubMed ID: 25292160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Using data from online geocoding services for the assessment of environmental obesogenic factors: a feasibility study.
Präger M; Kurz C; Böhm J; Laxy M; Maier W
Int J Health Geogr; 2019 Jun; 18(1):13. PubMed ID: 31174531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Improving geocoding matching rates of structured addresses in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Cortes TR; Silveira IHD; Junger WL
Cad Saude Publica; 2021; 37(7):e00039321. PubMed ID: 34346979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparing a single-stage geocoding method to a multi-stage geocoding method: how much and where do they disagree?
Lovasi GS; Weiss JC; Hoskins R; Whitsel EA; Rice K; Erickson CF; Psaty BM
Int J Health Geogr; 2007 Mar; 6():12. PubMed ID: 17367520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Geocoding one million of addresses using API: a semiautomatic multistep procedure].
Mataloni F; Bauleo L; Badaloni C; Nobile F; Savastano J; Noccioli F; Salatino CG; Balducci M; Cappai G; Rosa AC; Asta F; Fusco D; Michelozzi P; Davoli M
Epidemiol Prev; 2022; 46(3):160-167. PubMed ID: 35443573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A multifaceted comparison of ArcGIS and MapMarker for automated geocoding.
Kumar S; Liu M; Hwang SA
Geospat Health; 2012 Nov; 7(1):145-51. PubMed ID: 23242688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Geocoding addresses from a large population-based study: lessons learned.
McElroy JA; Remington PL; Trentham-Dietz A; Robert SA; Newcomb PA
Epidemiology; 2003 Jul; 14(4):399-407. PubMed ID: 12843762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Positional accuracy and geographic bias of four methods of geocoding in epidemiologic research.
Schootman M; Sterling DA; Struthers J; Yan Y; Laboube T; Emo B; Higgs G
Ann Epidemiol; 2007 Jun; 17(6):464-70. PubMed ID: 17448683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Quality of automatic geocoding tools: a study using addresses from hospital record files in Temuco, Chile.
Quinteros ME; Blazquez C; Rosas F; Ayala S; García XMO; Delgado-Saborit JM; Harrison RM; Ruiz-Rudolph P; Yohannessen K
Cad Saude Publica; 2022; 38(1):e00288920. PubMed ID: 35081207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Modeling the probability distribution of positional errors incurred by residential address geocoding.
Zimmerman DL; Fang X; Mazumdar S; Rushton G
Int J Health Geogr; 2007 Jan; 6():1. PubMed ID: 17214903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. POINT: Pipeline for Offline Conversion and Integration of Geocodes and Neighborhood Data.
Guo K; McCoy AB; Reese TJ; Wright A; Rosenbloom ST; Liu S; Russo EM; Steitz BD
Appl Clin Inform; 2023 Oct; 14(5):833-842. PubMed ID: 37541656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
