BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26154258)

  • 21. Investigating impacts of positional error on potential health care accessibility.
    Bell S; Wilson K; Shah TI; Gersher S; Elliott T
    Spat Spatiotemporal Epidemiol; 2012 Apr; 3(1):17-29. PubMed ID: 22469488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Comparison of Google and Yahoo applications for geocoding of postal addresses in epidemiological studies].
    Quesada JA; Nolasco A; Moncho J
    Rev Esp Salud Publica; 2013; 87(2):201-6. PubMed ID: 23775108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Geocoding accuracy and the recovery of relationships between environmental exposures and health.
    Mazumdar S; Rushton G; Smith BJ; Zimmerman DL; Donham KJ
    Int J Health Geogr; 2008 Apr; 7():13. PubMed ID: 18387189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Improved Geocoding of Cancer Registry Addresses in Urban and Rural Oklahoma.
    Dilekli N; Janitz A; Campbell J
    J Registry Manag; 2020; 47(1):13-20. PubMed ID: 32833379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Spatial Heterogeneity in Positional Errors: A Comparison of Two Residential Geocoding Efforts in the Agricultural Health Study.
    Fisher JA; Spaur M; Buller ID; Flory AR; Beane Freeman LE; Hofmann JN; Giangrande M; Jones RR; Ward MH
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Feb; 18(4):. PubMed ID: 33572119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Impacts of geocoding quality in environmental epidemiology studies: two case-studies in Tuscany Region (Central Italy)].
    Nuvolone D; Santini M; Pepe P; Cipriani F
    Epidemiol Prev; 2016; 40(1):44-50. PubMed ID: 26951701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Spatial Errors in Automated Geocoding of Incident Locations in Australian Suicide Mortality Data.
    Torok M; Konings P; Passioura J; Chen NA; Hewett M; Phillips M; Burnett A; Shand F; Christensen H
    Epidemiology; 2021 Nov; 32(6):896-903. PubMed ID: 34310446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Positional accuracy of two methods of geocoding.
    Ward MH; Nuckols JR; Giglierano J; Bonner MR; Wolter C; Airola M; Mix W; Colt JS; Hartge P
    Epidemiology; 2005 Jul; 16(4):542-7. PubMed ID: 15951673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Use of Google Maps for geocoding data from the Mortality Information System in Rio de Janeiro municipality, Brazil, 2010-2012].
    Silveira IHD; Oliveira BFA; Junger WL
    Epidemiol Serv Saude; 2017; 26(4):881-886. PubMed ID: 29211150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Error propagation models to examine the effects of geocoding quality on spatial analysis of individual-level datasets.
    Zandbergen PA; Hart TC; Lenzer KE; Camponovo ME
    Spat Spatiotemporal Epidemiol; 2012 Apr; 3(1):69-82. PubMed ID: 22469492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Geocoding Error, Spatial Uncertainty, and Implications for Exposure Assessment and Environmental Epidemiology.
    Kinnee EJ; Tripathy S; Schinasi L; Shmool JLC; Sheffield PE; Holguin F; Clougherty JE
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Aug; 17(16):. PubMed ID: 32806682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A research agenda: does geocoding positional error matter in health GIS studies?
    Jacquez GM
    Spat Spatiotemporal Epidemiol; 2012 Apr; 3(1):7-16. PubMed ID: 22469487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Influence of geocoding quality on environmental exposure assessment of children living near high traffic roads.
    Zandbergen PA
    BMC Public Health; 2007 Mar; 7():37. PubMed ID: 17367533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Geocoding in cancer research: a review.
    Rushton G; Armstrong MP; Gittler J; Greene BR; Pavlik CE; West MM; Zimmerman DL
    Am J Prev Med; 2006 Feb; 30(2 Suppl):S16-24. PubMed ID: 16458786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Improving geocoding outcomes for the Nebraska Cancer Registry: learning from proven practices.
    Lin G; Gray J; Qu M
    J Registry Manag; 2010; 37(2):49-56. PubMed ID: 21086822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Development of web-based geocoding applications for the population-based Birth Defects Surveillance System in New York state.
    Wang Y; Le LH; Wang X; Tao Z; Druschel CD; Cross PK; Hwang SA
    J Registry Manag; 2010; 37(1):16-21. PubMed ID: 20795565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Geocoding cryptosporidiosis cases in Ireland (2008-2017)-development of a reliable, reproducible, multiphase geocoding methodology.
    Domegan L; Garvey P; McKeown P; Johnson H; Hynds P; O'Dwyer J; ÓhAiseadha C
    Ir J Med Sci; 2021 Nov; 190(4):1497-1507. PubMed ID: 33464478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Decentralized and reproducible geocoding and characterization of community and environmental exposures for multisite studies.
    Brokamp C; Wolfe C; Lingren T; Harley J; Ryan P
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2018 Mar; 25(3):309-314. PubMed ID: 29126118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The effects of local street network characteristics on the positional accuracy of automated geocoding for geographic health studies.
    Zimmerman DL; Li J
    Int J Health Geogr; 2010 Feb; 9():10. PubMed ID: 20158886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Improving geocoding practices: evaluation of geocoding tools.
    Yang DH; Bilaver LM; Hayes O; Goerge R
    J Med Syst; 2004 Aug; 28(4):361-70. PubMed ID: 15366241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.