These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

248 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26154336)

  • 1. Comparison of Consumer and Research Monitors under Semistructured Settings.
    Bai Y; Welk GJ; Nam YH; Lee JA; Lee JM; Kim Y; Meier NF; Dixon PM
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2016 Jan; 48(1):151-8. PubMed ID: 26154336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of four Fitbit and Jawbone activity monitors with a research-grade ActiGraph accelerometer for estimating physical activity and energy expenditure.
    Imboden MT; Nelson MB; Kaminsky LA; Montoye AH
    Br J Sports Med; 2018 Jul; 52(13):844-850. PubMed ID: 28483930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Concurrent validity of the Fitbit for assessing sedentary behavior and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity.
    Redenius N; Kim Y; Byun W
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Feb; 19(1):29. PubMed ID: 30732582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Validity of consumer-based physical activity monitors.
    Lee JM; Kim Y; Welk GJ
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2014 Sep; 46(9):1840-8. PubMed ID: 24777201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The validity of consumer-level, activity monitors in healthy adults worn in free-living conditions: a cross-sectional study.
    Ferguson T; Rowlands AV; Olds T; Maher C
    Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act; 2015 Mar; 12():42. PubMed ID: 25890168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comprehensive comparison of Apple Watch and Fitbit monitors in a free-living setting.
    Bai Y; Tompkins C; Gell N; Dione D; Zhang T; Byun W
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(5):e0251975. PubMed ID: 34038458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Validity of Consumer-Based Physical Activity Monitors for Specific Activity Types.
    Nelson MB; Kaminsky LA; Dickin DC; Montoye AH
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2016 Aug; 48(8):1619-28. PubMed ID: 27015387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Estimating Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior in a Free-Living Context: A Pragmatic Comparison of Consumer-Based Activity Trackers and ActiGraph Accelerometry.
    Gomersall SR; Ng N; Burton NW; Pavey TG; Gilson ND; Brown WJ
    J Med Internet Res; 2016 Sep; 18(9):e239. PubMed ID: 27604226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Criterion Validity of Competing Accelerometry-Based Activity Monitoring Devices.
    Kim Y; Welk GJ
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2015 Nov; 47(11):2456-63. PubMed ID: 25910051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Accuracy of step count measured by physical activity monitors: The effect of gait speed and anatomical placement site.
    Chow JJ; Thom JM; Wewege MA; Ward RE; Parmenter BJ
    Gait Posture; 2017 Sep; 57():199-203. PubMed ID: 28666177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Use of consumer monitors for estimating energy expenditure in youth.
    LaMunion SR; Blythe AL; Hibbing PR; Kaplan AS; Clendenin BJ; Crouter SE
    Appl Physiol Nutr Metab; 2020 Feb; 45(2):161-168. PubMed ID: 31269409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessment of laboratory and daily energy expenditure estimates from consumer multi-sensor physical activity monitors.
    Chowdhury EA; Western MJ; Nightingale TE; Peacock OJ; Thompson D
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(2):e0171720. PubMed ID: 28234979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Validity of Wrist-Wearable Activity Devices for Estimating Physical Activity in Adolescents: Comparative Study.
    Hao Y; Ma XK; Zhu Z; Cao ZB
    JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2021 Jan; 9(1):e18320. PubMed ID: 33410757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparative evaluation of heart rate-based monitors: Apple Watch vs Fitbit Charge HR.
    Bai Y; Hibbing P; Mantis C; Welk GJ
    J Sports Sci; 2018 Aug; 36(15):1734-1741. PubMed ID: 29210326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of Polar Active Watch and Waist- and Wrist-Worn ActiGraph Accelerometers for Measuring Children's Physical Activity Levels during Unstructured Afterschool Programs.
    Kim Y; Lochbaum M
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2018 Oct; 15(10):. PubMed ID: 30332785
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Validation of the Fitbit Zip and Fitbit Flex with pregnant women in free-living conditions.
    St-Laurent A; Mony MM; Mathieu MÈ; Ruchat SM
    J Med Eng Technol; 2018 May; 42(4):259-264. PubMed ID: 30198806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Wrist-Worn Activity Trackers in Laboratory and Free-Living Settings for Patients With Chronic Pain: Criterion Validity Study.
    Sjöberg V; Westergren J; Monnier A; Lo Martire R; Hagströmer M; Äng BO; Vixner L
    JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2021 Jan; 9(1):e24806. PubMed ID: 33433391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Accuracy of inclinometer functions of the activPAL and ActiGraph GT3X+: A focus on physical activity.
    An HS; Kim Y; Lee JM
    Gait Posture; 2017 Jan; 51():174-180. PubMed ID: 27780084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Validity of Wearable Activity Monitors during Cycling and Resistance Exercise.
    Boudreaux BD; Hebert EP; Hollander DB; Williams BM; Cormier CL; Naquin MR; Gillan WW; Gusew EE; Kraemer RR
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2018 Mar; 50(3):624-633. PubMed ID: 29189666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Validity of Activity Trackers in Estimating Energy Expenditure During High-Intensity Functional Training.
    Morris CE; Wessel PA; Tinius RA; Schafer MA; Maples JM
    Res Q Exerc Sport; 2019 Sep; 90(3):377-384. PubMed ID: 31046630
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.