251 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26154336)
1. Comparison of Consumer and Research Monitors under Semistructured Settings.
Bai Y; Welk GJ; Nam YH; Lee JA; Lee JM; Kim Y; Meier NF; Dixon PM
Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2016 Jan; 48(1):151-8. PubMed ID: 26154336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of four Fitbit and Jawbone activity monitors with a research-grade ActiGraph accelerometer for estimating physical activity and energy expenditure.
Imboden MT; Nelson MB; Kaminsky LA; Montoye AH
Br J Sports Med; 2018 Jul; 52(13):844-850. PubMed ID: 28483930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Concurrent validity of the Fitbit for assessing sedentary behavior and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity.
Redenius N; Kim Y; Byun W
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Feb; 19(1):29. PubMed ID: 30732582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Validity of consumer-based physical activity monitors.
Lee JM; Kim Y; Welk GJ
Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2014 Sep; 46(9):1840-8. PubMed ID: 24777201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The validity of consumer-level, activity monitors in healthy adults worn in free-living conditions: a cross-sectional study.
Ferguson T; Rowlands AV; Olds T; Maher C
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act; 2015 Mar; 12():42. PubMed ID: 25890168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comprehensive comparison of Apple Watch and Fitbit monitors in a free-living setting.
Bai Y; Tompkins C; Gell N; Dione D; Zhang T; Byun W
PLoS One; 2021; 16(5):e0251975. PubMed ID: 34038458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Validity of Consumer-Based Physical Activity Monitors for Specific Activity Types.
Nelson MB; Kaminsky LA; Dickin DC; Montoye AH
Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2016 Aug; 48(8):1619-28. PubMed ID: 27015387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Estimating Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior in a Free-Living Context: A Pragmatic Comparison of Consumer-Based Activity Trackers and ActiGraph Accelerometry.
Gomersall SR; Ng N; Burton NW; Pavey TG; Gilson ND; Brown WJ
J Med Internet Res; 2016 Sep; 18(9):e239. PubMed ID: 27604226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Criterion Validity of Competing Accelerometry-Based Activity Monitoring Devices.
Kim Y; Welk GJ
Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2015 Nov; 47(11):2456-63. PubMed ID: 25910051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Accuracy of step count measured by physical activity monitors: The effect of gait speed and anatomical placement site.
Chow JJ; Thom JM; Wewege MA; Ward RE; Parmenter BJ
Gait Posture; 2017 Sep; 57():199-203. PubMed ID: 28666177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Use of consumer monitors for estimating energy expenditure in youth.
LaMunion SR; Blythe AL; Hibbing PR; Kaplan AS; Clendenin BJ; Crouter SE
Appl Physiol Nutr Metab; 2020 Feb; 45(2):161-168. PubMed ID: 31269409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessment of laboratory and daily energy expenditure estimates from consumer multi-sensor physical activity monitors.
Chowdhury EA; Western MJ; Nightingale TE; Peacock OJ; Thompson D
PLoS One; 2017; 12(2):e0171720. PubMed ID: 28234979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Validity of Wrist-Wearable Activity Devices for Estimating Physical Activity in Adolescents: Comparative Study.
Hao Y; Ma XK; Zhu Z; Cao ZB
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2021 Jan; 9(1):e18320. PubMed ID: 33410757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparative evaluation of heart rate-based monitors: Apple Watch vs Fitbit Charge HR.
Bai Y; Hibbing P; Mantis C; Welk GJ
J Sports Sci; 2018 Aug; 36(15):1734-1741. PubMed ID: 29210326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of Polar Active Watch and Waist- and Wrist-Worn ActiGraph Accelerometers for Measuring Children's Physical Activity Levels during Unstructured Afterschool Programs.
Kim Y; Lochbaum M
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2018 Oct; 15(10):. PubMed ID: 30332785
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Validation of the Fitbit Zip and Fitbit Flex with pregnant women in free-living conditions.
St-Laurent A; Mony MM; Mathieu MÈ; Ruchat SM
J Med Eng Technol; 2018 May; 42(4):259-264. PubMed ID: 30198806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Wrist-Worn Activity Trackers in Laboratory and Free-Living Settings for Patients With Chronic Pain: Criterion Validity Study.
Sjöberg V; Westergren J; Monnier A; Lo Martire R; Hagströmer M; Äng BO; Vixner L
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2021 Jan; 9(1):e24806. PubMed ID: 33433391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Accuracy of inclinometer functions of the activPAL and ActiGraph GT3X+: A focus on physical activity.
An HS; Kim Y; Lee JM
Gait Posture; 2017 Jan; 51():174-180. PubMed ID: 27780084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Validity of Wearable Activity Monitors during Cycling and Resistance Exercise.
Boudreaux BD; Hebert EP; Hollander DB; Williams BM; Cormier CL; Naquin MR; Gillan WW; Gusew EE; Kraemer RR
Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2018 Mar; 50(3):624-633. PubMed ID: 29189666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Validity of Activity Trackers in Estimating Energy Expenditure During High-Intensity Functional Training.
Morris CE; Wessel PA; Tinius RA; Schafer MA; Maples JM
Res Q Exerc Sport; 2019 Sep; 90(3):377-384. PubMed ID: 31046630
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
