375 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26154456)
1. Dentoalveolar mandibular changes with self-ligating versus conventional bracket systems: A CBCT and dental cast study.
Almeida MR; Futagami C; Conti AC; Oltramari-Navarro PV; Navarro Rde L
Dental Press J Orthod; 2015; 20(3):50-7. PubMed ID: 26154456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Preliminary cone-beam computed tomography study evaluating dental and skeletal changes after treatment with a mandibular Schwarz appliance.
Tai K; Hotokezaka H; Park JH; Tai H; Miyajima K; Choi M; Kai LM; Mishima K
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Sep; 138(3):262.e1-262.e11; discussion 262-3. PubMed ID: 20816294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Transversal maxillary dento-alveolar changes in patients treated with active and passive self-ligating brackets: a randomized clinical trial using CBCT-scans and digital models.
Cattaneo PM; Treccani M; Carlsson K; Thorgeirsson T; Myrda A; Cevidanes LH; Melsen B
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2011 Nov; 14(4):222-33. PubMed ID: 22008302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Assessment of Dental Arch Changes and Buccal Bone Thickness in Patients treated with Self-ligating Brackets.
Ibiapina DJ; Oltramari-Navarro PV; Navarro RL; Almeida MR; Mendonça DL; Conti AC
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2016 Jun; 17(6):434-9. PubMed ID: 27484594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Mandibular dental arch changes associated with treatment of crowding using self-ligating and conventional brackets.
Pandis N; Polychronopoulou A; Makou M; Eliades T
Eur J Orthod; 2010 Jun; 32(3):248-53. PubMed ID: 19959610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of mandibular arch changes during alignment and leveling with 2 preadjusted edgewise appliances.
Fleming PS; DiBiase AT; Sarri G; Lee RT
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Sep; 136(3):340-7. PubMed ID: 19732667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Dental and skeletal changes in the upper and lower jaws after treatment with Schwarz appliances using cone-beam computed tomography.
Tai K; Park JH
J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2010; 35(1):111-20. PubMed ID: 21189775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Mandibular dental arch changes with active self-ligating brackets combined with different archwires.
Atik E; Akarsu-Guven B; Kocadereli I
Niger J Clin Pract; 2018 May; 21(5):566-572. PubMed ID: 29735855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cone Beam Computed Tomography-based Evaluation of the Anterior Teeth Position Changes obtained by Passive Self-ligating Brackets.
Rhoden FK; Maltagliati LÁ; de Castro Ferreira Conti AC; Almeida-Pedrin RR; Filho LC; de Almeida Cardoso M
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2016 Aug; 17(8):623-9. PubMed ID: 27659077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Labio-lingual root control of lower anterior teeth and canines obtained by active and passive self-ligating brackets.
Cattaneo PM; Salih RA; Melsen B
Angle Orthod; 2013 Jul; 83(4):691-7. PubMed ID: 23249256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Geometric morphometric evaluations of a randomized prospective split-mouth study on modes of ligation and reverse-curve mechanics.
Celar AG; Onodera K; Bertl MH; Astl E; Bantleon HP; Sato S; Mitteroecker P
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2014 Aug; 17(3):158-69. PubMed ID: 24720396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of transverse maxillary dental arch width changes with self-ligating and conventional brackets in patients requiring premolar extraction - A randomised clinical trial.
Bashir R; Sonar S; Batra P; Srivastava A; Singla A
Int Orthod; 2019 Dec; 17(4):687-692. PubMed ID: 31466930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparative assessment of alignment efficiency and space closure of active and passive self-ligating vs conventional appliances in adolescents: a single-center randomized controlled trial.
Songra G; Clover M; Atack NE; Ewings P; Sherriff M; Sandy JR; Ireland AJ
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 May; 145(5):569-78. PubMed ID: 24785921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effects on the dental arch form using a preadjusted appliance with premolar extraction in Class I crowding.
Miyake H; Ryu T; Himuro T
Angle Orthod; 2008 Nov; 78(6):1043-9. PubMed ID: 18947268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of WALA ridge and dental arch dimensions changes after orthodontic treatment using a passive self-ligating system or conventional fixed appliance.
Esteves T; Salvatore Freitas KM; Vaz de Lima D; Cotrin P; Cançado RH; Valarelli FP; De Freitas MR; Gobbi de Oliveira RC
Indian J Dent Res; 2019; 30(3):386-392. PubMed ID: 31397413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Three-dimensional digital cast analysis of the effects produced by a passive self-ligating system.
Lineberger MB; Franchi L; Cevidanes LH; Huanca Ghislanzoni LT; McNamara JA
Eur J Orthod; 2016 Dec; 38(6):609-614. PubMed ID: 26843516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparative assessment of dental and basal arch dimensions of passive and active self-ligating versus conventional appliances : A randomized clinical trial.
Alabdullah MM; Burhan AS; Nabawia A; Nawaya F; Saltaji H
J Orofac Orthop; 2023 Apr; 84(Suppl 2):74-83. PubMed ID: 35788397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Surgically assisted rapid maxillary expansion: cone-beam computed tomography evaluation of different surgical techniques and their effects on the maxillary dentoskeletal complex.
Sygouros A; Motro M; Ugurlu F; Acar A
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Dec; 146(6):748-57. PubMed ID: 25432256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of maxillary arch dimensional and inclination changes with self-ligating and conventional brackets using broad archwires.
Atik E; Akarsu-Guven B; Kocadereli I; Ciger S
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Jun; 149(6):830-7. PubMed ID: 27241993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Finishing effectiveness of different archwires using SmartClip™ self-ligating brackets: a clinical study.
Ferrari S; Bellincampi M; Sfondrini MF; Caprioglio A; Gandini P
Int Orthod; 2014 Mar; 12(1):125-38. PubMed ID: 24456630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
