These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26154461)

  • 1. Facial profile esthetic preferences: perception in two Brazilian states.
    Oliveira MD; Silveira BL; Mattos CT; Marquezan M
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2015; 20(3):88-95. PubMed ID: 26154461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Photos vs silhouettes for evaluation of profile esthetics between white and black evaluators.
    Pithon MM; Silva IS; Almeida IO; Nery MS; de Souza ML; Barbosa G; Dos Santos AF; da Silva Coqueiro R
    Angle Orthod; 2014 Mar; 84(2):231-8. PubMed ID: 23957665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparative assessment of the perception of Chinese facial profile esthetics.
    Soh J; Chew MT; Wong HB
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Jun; 127(6):692-9. PubMed ID: 15953894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Bimaxillary protrusion in black Americans--an esthetic evaluation and the treatment considerations.
    Farrow AL; Zarrinnia K; Azizi K
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1993 Sep; 104(3):240-50. PubMed ID: 8362785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An Asian community's perspective on facial profile attractiveness.
    Soh J; Chew MT; Wong HB
    Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 2007 Feb; 35(1):18-24. PubMed ID: 17244134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Facial profile study using 3-dimensional photographs to assess esthetic preferences of Hong Kong Chinese orthognathic patients and laypersons.
    Tan SK; Leung WK; Tang ATH; Zwahlen RA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2022 Feb; 161(2):e105-e113. PubMed ID: 34531091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Correlation between objective and subjective evaluation of profile in bimaxillary protrusion patients after orthodontic treatment.
    Huang YP; Li WR
    Angle Orthod; 2015 Jul; 85(4):690-8. PubMed ID: 25347046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Influence of anteroposterior mandibular positions on facial attractiveness in Japanese adults.
    Kuroda S; Sugahara T; Takabatake S; Taketa H; Ando R; Takano-Yamamoto T
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jan; 135(1):73-8. PubMed ID: 19121504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Preferences of AP position of the straight Caucasian facial profile.
    Mees S; Jiménez Bellinga R; Mommaerts MY; De Pauw GA
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2013 Dec; 41(8):755-63. PubMed ID: 23453133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The influence of sagittal position of the mandible in facial attractiveness and social perception.
    Sena LMF; Damasceno E Araújo LAL; Farias ACR; Pereira HSG
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2017; 22(2):77-86. PubMed ID: 28658359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Esthetic perception of facial profile after treatment with the Thurow Appliance.
    Pithon MM; Lacerda-Santos R; Oliveira DL; Alves JV; Britto JP; Souza Eda S; Alves LP; Barbosa G; Coqueiro Rda S; Santos AF
    Braz Oral Res; 2015; 29():. PubMed ID: 25715042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Perception of facial profile attractiveness of a brown subject displaying different degrees of lip projection or retrusion, in the city of Salvador/Bahia.
    Carneiro EN; Pithon MM; Machado AW; Braga E
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2018; 23(2):62-67. PubMed ID: 29898159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Soft tissue profile in white Brazilian adults with normal occlusions and well-balanced faces.
    Scavone H; Zahn-Silva W; do Valle-Corotti KM; Nahás AC
    Angle Orthod; 2008 Jan; 78(1):58-63. PubMed ID: 18193966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Esthetic evaluation of Asian-Chinese profiles from a white perspective.
    Chan EK; Soh J; Petocz P; Darendeliler MA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Apr; 133(4):532-8. PubMed ID: 18405817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Methods to evaluate profile preferences for the anteroposterior position of the mandible.
    Orsini MG; Huang GJ; Kiyak HA; Ramsay DS; Bollen AM; Anderson NK; Giddon DB
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Sep; 130(3):283-91. PubMed ID: 16979485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of facial forms and midline deviations and rolls on female facial beauty according to laypeople, orthodontists, and prosthodontists or restorative dentists.
    Rakhshan V; Atashkar N; Rekabi A; Paydar Z; Hashemi Ashtiani A; Ashoori N; Moradinejad M
    Sci Rep; 2024 Sep; 14(1):20900. PubMed ID: 39245723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Facial profile preferences: differences in the perception of children with and without orthodontic history.
    Cala L; Spalj S; Slaj M; Lapter MV; Slaj M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Oct; 138(4):442-450. PubMed ID: 20889049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Facial profile preferences, self-awareness and perception among groups of people in the United Arab Emirates.
    Al Taki A; Guidoum A
    J Orthod Sci; 2014 Apr; 3(2):55-61. PubMed ID: 24987664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The importance of using the entire face to assess facial profile attractiveness.
    Tauk A; Bassil-Nassif N; Mouhanna-Fattal C; Bouserhal J
    Int Orthod; 2016 Mar; 14(1):65-79. PubMed ID: 26867684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Facial profile perceptions in a group of South African blacks.
    Beukes S; Dawjee SM; Hlongwa P
    SADJ; 2007 May; 62(4):160, 162-7. PubMed ID: 17907584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.