These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

240 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26154727)

  • 1. Efficacy of Laser Activated Irrigation on Apically Extruded Debris with Different Preparation Systems.
    Kuştarcı A; Er K
    Photomed Laser Surg; 2015 Jul; 33(7):384-9. PubMed ID: 26154727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of Apically Extruded Debris using Two Niti Systems Associated with Two İrrigation Techniques in Primary Teeth.
    Gungor OE; Kustarci A
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2016; 40(6):490-495. PubMed ID: 27805889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of the effect of various irrigants on apically extruded debris after root canal preparation.
    Parirokh M; Jalali S; Haghdoost AA; Abbott PV
    J Endod; 2012 Feb; 38(2):196-9. PubMed ID: 22244635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Efficacy of photon-initiated photoacoustic streaming on apically extruded debris with different preparation systems in curved canals.
    Arslan D; Kustarci A
    Int Endod J; 2018 Jan; 51 Suppl 1():e65-e72. PubMed ID: 28708251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Apically Extruded Debris in Curved Root Canals Using the WaveOne Gold Reciprocating and Twisted File Adaptive Systems.
    Boijink D; Costa DD; Hoppe CB; Kopper PMP; Grecca FS
    J Endod; 2018 Aug; 44(8):1289-1292. PubMed ID: 29908692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Apical extrusion of debris using self-adjusting file, reciprocating single-file, and 2 rotary instrumentation systems.
    Koçak S; Koçak MM; Sağlam BC; Türker SA; Sağsen B; Er Ö
    J Endod; 2013 Oct; 39(10):1278-80. PubMed ID: 24041391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Quantitative evaluation of apical extrusion of debris and irrigants using four rotary instrumentation systems: an in vitro study.
    Nagaveni SA; Balakoti KR; Smita K; Ratnakar P; Satish SV; Aravind T
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2013 Nov; 14(6):1065-9. PubMed ID: 24858752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of debris extruded apically during the removal of root canal filling material using ProTaper, D-RaCe, and R-Endo rotary nickel-titanium retreatment instruments and hand files.
    Topçuoğlu HS; Aktı A; Tuncay Ö; Dinçer AN; Düzgün S; Topçuoğlu G
    J Endod; 2014 Dec; 40(12):2066-9. PubMed ID: 25443282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An in vitro comparison of apically extruded debris and instrumentation times with ProTaper Universal, ProTaper Next, Twisted File Adaptive, and HyFlex instruments.
    Capar ID; Arslan H; Akcay M; Ertas H
    J Endod; 2014 Oct; 40(10):1638-41. PubMed ID: 25260737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Influence of Different Kinematics on Apical Extrusion of Irrigant and Debris during Canal Preparation Using K3XF Instruments.
    Toyoğlu M; Altunbaş D
    J Endod; 2017 Sep; 43(9):1565-1568. PubMed ID: 28735794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Influence of a glide path on apical extrusion of debris during canal preparation using single-file systems in curved canals.
    Topçuoğlu HS; Düzgün S; Akpek F; Topçuoğlu G; Aktı A
    Int Endod J; 2016 Jun; 49(6):599-603. PubMed ID: 26084620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Apically extruded debris during root canal preparation using Vortex Blue, K3XF, ProTaper Next and Reciproc instruments.
    Topçuoğlu HS; Zan R; Akpek F; Topçuoğlu G; Ulusan Ö; Aktı A; Düzgün S; Ağırnaslıgil M
    Int Endod J; 2016 Dec; 49(12):1183-1187. PubMed ID: 26547513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessment of apically extruded debris and irrigant produced by different nickel-titanium instrument systems.
    Küçükyilmaz E; Savas S; Saygili G; Uysal B
    Braz Oral Res; 2015; 29():1-6. PubMed ID: 25387860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of different laser-assisted irrigation activation techniques on apical debris extrusion.
    Doğanay Yıldız E; Dinçer B; Fidan ME
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2020 Jul; 78(5):332-336. PubMed ID: 31986947
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Apically Extruded Debris after Retreatment Procedure with Reciproc, ProTaper Next, and Twisted File Adaptive Instruments.
    Yılmaz K; Özyürek T
    J Endod; 2017 Apr; 43(4):648-651. PubMed ID: 28258810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of coronal flaring on apical extrusion of debris during root canal instrumentation using single-file systems.
    Topçuoğlu HS; Üstün Y; Akpek F; Aktı A; Topçuoğlu G
    Int Endod J; 2016 Sep; 49(9):884-889. PubMed ID: 26283644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Apical extrusion of debris in flat-oval root canals after using different instrumentation systems.
    Kirchhoff AL; Fariniuk LF; Mello I
    J Endod; 2015 Feb; 41(2):237-41. PubMed ID: 25447504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Apically Extruded Debris during Root Canal Instrumentation with Reciproc Blue, HyFlex EDM, and XP-endo Shaper Nickel-titanium Files.
    Uslu G; Özyürek T; Yılmaz K; Gündoğar M; Plotino G
    J Endod; 2018 May; 44(5):856-859. PubMed ID: 29550013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparative Safety of Needle, EndoActivator, and Laser-Activated Irrigation in Overinstrumented Root Canals.
    Genc Sen O; Kaya M
    Photomed Laser Surg; 2018 Apr; 36(4):198-202. PubMed ID: 29265956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Weight of apically extruded debris following use of two canal instrumentation techniques and two designs of irrigation needles.
    Yeter KY; Evcil MS; Ayranci LB; Ersoy I
    Int Endod J; 2013 Sep; 46(9):795-9. PubMed ID: 23441844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.