These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26156338)

  • 1. We need a measured approach to metrics.
    Wilsdon J
    Nature; 2015 Jul; 523(7559):129. PubMed ID: 26156338
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Q&A Jane Harding: individual approach.
    Harding J; Mallapaty S
    Nature; 2014 Jul; 511(7510):S82-3. PubMed ID: 25054858
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Editorial introspection: problems of a successful peer reviewed journal.
    Rossdale PD
    Equine Vet J; 1998 Jan; 30(1):4-5. PubMed ID: 9480209
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The universities' research assessment exercise 1992: a second opinion.
    Howie JG; Stott NC
    Lancet; 1993 Sep; 342(8872):665-6. PubMed ID: 8103152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Importance of peer-reviewed science in the debates on public policy.
    Scanes CG
    Poult Sci; 2009 Jan; 88(1):1. PubMed ID: 19096049
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. World view: Moment of reckoning.
    Macilwain C
    Nature; 2010 Apr; 464(7291):975. PubMed ID: 20393535
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. In pursuit of balance.
    Nature; 2005 Mar; 434(7029):1. PubMed ID: 15744254
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Germany claims success for elite universities drive.
    Schiermeier Q; Van Noorden R
    Nature; 2015 Sep; 525(7568):168-9. PubMed ID: 26354463
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The future of cardiology research in the United Kingdom.
    Taylor J
    Circulation; 2006 Oct; 114(17):f168. PubMed ID: 17063563
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Tough love.
    Nature; 2010 Mar; 464(7288):465. PubMed ID: 20336087
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Symposium overview: Raising standards.
    Grayson M
    Nature; 2015 Apr; 520(7549):S10-2. PubMed ID: 25924192
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An experiment in progress.
    Nat Med; 2010 Sep; 16(9):935. PubMed ID: 20823851
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Scottish science is ready to go it alone.
    Macilwain C
    Nature; 2013 Jan; 493(7434):579. PubMed ID: 23364703
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Basic instincts.
    Nat Nanotechnol; 2008 Feb; 3(2):59. PubMed ID: 18654454
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Conservative vacuum.
    Nature; 2009 Nov; 462(7272):389-90. PubMed ID: 19940870
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. How do peer reviewers of journal articles perform? Evaluating the reviewers with a sham paper.
    Kumar PD
    J Assoc Physicians India; 1999 Feb; 47(2):198-200. PubMed ID: 10999090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Coming back to life Montreal.
    Hoag H
    Nature; 2004 Jul; 430(6996):274-5. PubMed ID: 15241427
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. UK universities face star treatment in funding revamp.
    Giles J
    Nature; 2003 Jun; 423(6940):574. PubMed ID: 12789301
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Downside of assessment success.
    Williams N
    Curr Biol; 2002 Jan; 12(2):R41-2. PubMed ID: 11818071
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Examining the Royal Colleges' examiners.
    Fleming PR; Syme J
    Lancet; 1990 Apr; 335(8696):1040. PubMed ID: 1970092
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.