219 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26156758)
21. Coherent wavepackets in the Fenna-Matthews-Olson complex are robust to excitonic-structure perturbations caused by mutagenesis.
Maiuri M; Ostroumov EE; Saer RG; Blankenship RE; Scholes GD
Nat Chem; 2018 Feb; 10(2):177-183. PubMed ID: 29359758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Excitation energy trapping and dissipation by Ni-substituted bacteriochlorophyll a in reconstituted LH1 complexes from Rhodospirillum rubrum.
Lambrev PH; Miloslavina Y; van Stokkum IH; Stahl AD; Michalik M; Susz A; Tworzydło J; Fiedor J; Huhn G; Groot ML; van Grondelle R; Garab G; Fiedor L
J Phys Chem B; 2013 Sep; 117(38):11260-71. PubMed ID: 23837465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Perturbation of bacteriochlorophyll molecules in Fenna-Matthews-Olson protein complexes through mutagenesis of cysteine residues.
Saer R; Orf GS; Lu X; Zhang H; Cuneo MJ; Myles DAA; Blankenship RE
Biochim Biophys Acta; 2016 Sep; 1857(9):1455-1463. PubMed ID: 27114180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Open quantum system parameters for light harvesting complexes from molecular dynamics.
Wang X; Ritschel G; Wüster S; Eisfeld A
Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2015 Oct; 17(38):25629-41. PubMed ID: 26372495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. On uncorrelated inter-monomer Förster energy transfer in Fenna-Matthews-Olson complexes.
Kell A; Khmelnitskiy AY; Reinot T; Jankowiak R
J R Soc Interface; 2019 Feb; 16(151):20180882. PubMed ID: 30958204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. How proteins trigger excitation energy transfer in the FMO complex of green sulfur bacteria.
Adolphs J; Renger T
Biophys J; 2006 Oct; 91(8):2778-97. PubMed ID: 16861264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. DFTB/MM Molecular Dynamics Simulations of the FMO Light-Harvesting Complex.
Maity S; Bold BM; Prajapati JD; Sokolov M; Kubař T; Elstner M; Kleinekathöfer U
J Phys Chem Lett; 2020 Oct; 11(20):8660-8667. PubMed ID: 32991176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Normal mode analysis of the spectral density of the Fenna-Matthews-Olson light-harvesting protein: how the protein dissipates the excess energy of excitons.
Renger T; Klinger A; Steinecker F; Schmidt am Busch M; Numata J; Müh F
J Phys Chem B; 2012 Dec; 116(50):14565-80. PubMed ID: 23163520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Robustness, efficiency, and optimality in the Fenna-Matthews-Olson photosynthetic pigment-protein complex.
Baker LA; Habershon S
J Chem Phys; 2015 Sep; 143(10):105101. PubMed ID: 26374060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Simulated two-dimensional electronic spectroscopy of the eight-bacteriochlorophyll FMO complex.
Yeh SH; Kais S
J Chem Phys; 2014 Dec; 141(23):234105. PubMed ID: 25527917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Selective chemical shift assignment of bacteriochlorophyll a in uniformly [13C-15N]-labeled light-harvesting 1 complexes by solid-state NMR in ultrahigh magnetic field.
Pandit A; Buda F; van Gammeren AJ; Ganapathy S; de Groot HJ
J Phys Chem B; 2010 May; 114(18):6207-15. PubMed ID: 20408539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Energy landscape of the intact and destabilized FMO antennas from C. tepidum and the L122Q mutant: Low temperature spectroscopy and modeling study.
Khmelnitskiy A; Kell A; Reinot T; Saer RG; Blankenship RE; Jankowiak R
Biochim Biophys Acta Bioenerg; 2018 Mar; 1859(3):165-173. PubMed ID: 29198987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Multipartite entanglement in the Fenna-Matthews-Olson (FMO) pigment-protein complex.
Thilagam A
J Chem Phys; 2012 May; 136(17):175104. PubMed ID: 22583269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Ultrafast Spectroscopic Investigation of Energy Transfer in Site-Directed Mutants of the Fenna-Matthews-Olson (FMO) Antenna Complex from Chlorobaculum tepidum.
Magdaong NCM; Saer RG; Niedzwiedzki DM; Blankenship RE
J Phys Chem B; 2017 May; 121(18):4700-4712. PubMed ID: 28422512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Normal mode analysis of spectral density of FMO trimers: Intra- and intermonomer energy transfer.
Klinger A; Lindorfer D; Müh F; Renger T
J Chem Phys; 2020 Dec; 153(21):215103. PubMed ID: 33291900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. A stochastic surrogate Hamiltonian approach of coherent and incoherent exciton transport in the Fenna-Matthews-Olson complex.
Renaud N; Ratner MA; Mujica V
J Chem Phys; 2011 Aug; 135(7):075102. PubMed ID: 21861585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Efficient energy transfer in light-harvesting systems: quantum-classical comparison, flux network, and robustness analysis.
Wu J; Liu F; Ma J; Silbey RJ; Cao J
J Chem Phys; 2012 Nov; 137(17):174111. PubMed ID: 23145721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Intensity dependence of the excited state lifetimes and triplet conversion yield in the Fenna-Matthews-Olson antenna protein.
Orf GS; Niedzwiedzki DM; Blankenship RE
J Phys Chem B; 2014 Feb; 118(8):2058-69. PubMed ID: 24490821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Quest for spatially correlated fluctuations in the FMO light-harvesting complex.
Olbrich C; Strümpfer J; Schulten K; Kleinekathöfer U
J Phys Chem B; 2011 Feb; 115(4):758-64. PubMed ID: 21142050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Effects of Heterogeneous Protein Environment on Excitation Energy Transfer Dynamics in the Fenna-Matthews-Olson Complex.
Hu Z; Liu Z; Sun X
J Phys Chem B; 2022 Nov; 126(45):9271-9287. PubMed ID: 36327977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
