These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2615730)

  • 1. [Magnets used in dentistry. Preliminary data on in vitro biocompatibility].
    Gonella AM; Amedeo MR; Cannas M; Pezzoli M
    Minerva Stomatol; 1989 Oct; 38(10):1053-8. PubMed ID: 2615730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Orthodontic rare earth magnets--in vitro assessment of cytotoxicity.
    Bondemark L; Kurol J; Wennberg A
    Br J Orthod; 1994 Nov; 21(4):335-41. PubMed ID: 7857892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. In vitro cytotoxicity testing of neodymium-iron-boron magnets.
    Donohue VE; McDonald F; Evans R
    J Appl Biomater; 1995; 6(1):69-74. PubMed ID: 7703540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Magnetic strength and corrosion of rare earth magnets.
    Ahmad KA; Drummond JL; Graber T; BeGole E
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Sep; 130(3):275.e11-5. PubMed ID: 16979482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Importance of cell cultures in biocompatible dental materials research].
    Nahid M; Bottenberg P
    Rev Belge Med Dent (1984); 2003; 58(3):189-96. PubMed ID: 14686145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. New rare earth magnetic technology: the Jackson solid state attachment system.
    Jackson TR
    Trends Tech Contemp Dent Lab; 1986 May; 3(4):31-9. PubMed ID: 3523723
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Rare earth magnetic attachments: the state of the art in removable prosthodontics.
    Jackson TR; Healey KW
    Quintessence Int; 1987 Jan; 18(1):41-51. PubMed ID: 3547453
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of the attractive force of different types of new-generation magnetic attachment systems.
    Akin H; Coskun ME; Akin EG; Ozdemir AK
    J Prosthet Dent; 2011 Mar; 105(3):203-7. PubMed ID: 21356413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [The new magnets for dental prostheses].
    Pirnay L
    Cah Prothese; 1989 Mar; (65):62-71. PubMed ID: 2699827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparison of the in vitro cytotoxicity of four restorative materials assessed by changes in enzyme levels in two cell types.
    Meryon SD; Riches DW
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1982 Jul; 16(4):519-28. PubMed ID: 6213626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Magnetic retention in implantology].
    Gelhard TB
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 1989 Mar; 96(3):100-2. PubMed ID: 2622504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Magnets in prosthetic dentistry.
    Riley MA; Walmsley AD; Harris IR
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Aug; 86(2):137-42. PubMed ID: 11514799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Corrosion resistance of iron-platinum magnets.
    Yiu EY; Fang DT; Chu FC; Chow TW
    J Dent; 2004 Aug; 32(6):423-9. PubMed ID: 15240060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Death by magnets: an unrecognized danger in dentistry.
    Neiburger E
    Gen Dent; 2008; 56(4):346-7. PubMed ID: 19284195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Biocompatibility of posterior restorative materials.
    Schuster GS; Lefebvre CA; Wataha JC; White SN
    J Calif Dent Assoc; 1996 Sep; 24(9):17-31. PubMed ID: 9120609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. In vitro biocompatibility of denture relining materials.
    Dahl JE; Frangou-Polyzois MJ; Polyzois GL
    Gerodontology; 2006 Mar; 23(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 16433637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Biocompatibility of glass-ionomer cements using mouse lymphoma cells in vitro.
    Ribeiro DA; Marques ME; Salvadori DM
    J Oral Rehabil; 2006 Dec; 33(12):912-7. PubMed ID: 17168933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. International conference: In Vitro Assessment of the Biocompatibility of Dental Materials. 21-22 September 1987. Birmingham University, UK.
    Int Endod J; 1988 Mar; 21(2):50-187. PubMed ID: 3268554
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Quantitative enzyme spectroscopy in the assessment of cell damage in vitro.
    Meryon SD
    Int Endod J; 1988 Mar; 21(2):113-9. PubMed ID: 3268547
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The influence of surface area on the in vitro cytotoxicity of a range of dental materials.
    Meryon SD
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1987 Oct; 21(10):1179-86. PubMed ID: 3693382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.