143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26157732)
1. Assessment of the Radiation Attenuation Properties of Several Lead Free Composites by Monte Carlo Simulation.
Kazempour M; Saeedimoghadam M; Shekoohi Shooli F; Shokrpour N
J Biomed Phys Eng; 2015 Jun; 5(2):67-76. PubMed ID: 26157732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of the scattered radiations of lead and lead-free aprons in diagnostic radiology by MCNPX.
Tayebi M; Shooli FS; Saeedi-Moghadam M
Technol Health Care; 2017; 25(3):513-520. PubMed ID: 28085021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Radiation shielding materials and radiation scatter effects for interventional radiology (IR) physicians.
McCaffrey JP; Tessier F; Shen H
Med Phys; 2012 Jul; 39(7):4537-46. PubMed ID: 22830785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Not all lightweight lead aprons and thyroid shields are alike.
Fakhoury E; Provencher JA; Subramaniam R; Finlay DJ
J Vasc Surg; 2019 Jul; 70(1):246-250. PubMed ID: 30292602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of the transmitted exposure through lead equivalent aprons used in a radiology department, including the contribution from backscatter.
Christodoulou EG; Goodsitt MM; Larson SC; Darner KL; Satti J; Chan HP
Med Phys; 2003 Jun; 30(6):1033-8. PubMed ID: 12852526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Novel paint design based on nanopowder to protection against X and gamma rays.
Movahedi MM; Abdi A; Mehdizadeh A; Dehghan N; Heidari E; Masumi Y; Abbaszadeh M
Indian J Nucl Med; 2014 Jan; 29(1):18-21. PubMed ID: 24591777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Impact of using scatter-mimicking beams instead of standard beams to measure penetration when assessing the protective value of radiation-protective garments.
Jones AK; Pasciak AS; Wagner LK
Med Phys; 2018 Mar; 45(3):1071-1079. PubMed ID: 29314058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Are Antimony-Bismuth Aprons as Efficient as Lead Rubber Aprons in Providing Shielding against Scattered Radiation?
Johansen S; Hauge IHR; Hogg P; England A; Lança L; Gunn C; Sanderud A
J Med Imaging Radiat Sci; 2018 Jun; 49(2):201-206. PubMed ID: 32074039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Influence of the size of nano- and microparticles and photon energy on mass attenuation coefficients of bismuth-silicon shields in diagnostic radiology.
Malekzadeh R; Mehnati P; Sooteh MY; Mesbahi A
Radiol Phys Technol; 2019 Sep; 12(3):325-334. PubMed ID: 31385155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of the radiation protection effect of different radiation protection aprons made of different materials.
König AM; Verbe Zoum J; Fiebich M; Abissi PW; Mahnken AH
Eur J Radiol; 2023 Jul; 164():110862. PubMed ID: 37209465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Shielding performance of multi-metal nanoparticle composites for diagnostic radiology: an MCNPX and Geant4 study.
Asadpour N; Malekzadeh R; Rajabpour S; Refahi S; Mehnati P; Shanei A
Radiol Phys Technol; 2023 Mar; 16(1):57-68. PubMed ID: 36562940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. How efficient are metal-polymer and dual-metals-polymer non-lead radiation shields?
Salehi Z; Tayebi Khorami M
J Med Radiat Sci; 2024 Mar; 71(1):57-62. PubMed ID: 37875268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Lightweight Lead Aprons: The Emperor's New Clothes in the Angiography Suite?
Lu H; Boyd C; Dawson J
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2019 May; 57(5):730-739. PubMed ID: 31005510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Monte Carlo simulation of x-ray buildup factors of lead and its applications in shielding of diagnostic x-ray facilities.
Kharrati H; Agrebi A; Karaoui MK
Med Phys; 2007 Apr; 34(4):1398-404. PubMed ID: 17500471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Non-Lead Protective Aprons for the Protection of Interventional Radiology Physicians from Radiation Exposure in Clinical Settings: An Initial Study.
Kato M; Chida K; Munehisa M; Sato T; Inaba Y; Suzuki M; Zuguchi M
Diagnostics (Basel); 2021 Sep; 11(9):. PubMed ID: 34573955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Radiation shielding assessment for interventional radiology personnel: Geant4 dosimetry of lead-free compositions.
Moradi F; Jalili M; Saraee KRE; Abdi MR; Rashid HAA
Biomed Phys Eng Express; 2024 Feb; 10(2):. PubMed ID: 38320327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. On the (f)utility of measuring the lead equivalence of protective garments.
Jones AK; Wagner LK
Med Phys; 2013 Jun; 40(6):063902. PubMed ID: 23718618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Composite materials for x-ray protection.
Yaffe MJ; Mawdsley GE; Lilley M; Servant R; Reh G
Health Phys; 1991 May; 60(5):661-4. PubMed ID: 2019497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Light-weight lead aprons--light on weight, protection or labelling accuracy?
Muir S; McLeod R; Dove R
Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2005 Jun; 28(2):128-30. PubMed ID: 16060320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of non-lead-based protective radiological material in spinal surgery.
Scuderi GJ; Brusovanik GV; Campbell DR; Henry RP; Kwon B; Vaccaro AR
Spine J; 2006; 6(5):577-82. PubMed ID: 16934731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
