BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26158050)

  • 1. Comparative analysis of image-based phenotypes of mammographic density and parenchymal patterns in distinguishing between BRCA1/2 cases, unilateral cancer cases, and controls.
    Li H; Giger ML; Lan L; Janardanan J; Sennett CA
    J Med Imaging (Bellingham); 2014 Oct; 1(3):031009. PubMed ID: 26158050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Computerized analysis of mammographic parenchymal patterns on a large clinical dataset of full-field digital mammograms: robustness study with two high-risk datasets.
    Li H; Giger ML; Lan L; Bancroft Brown J; MacMahon A; Mussman M; Olopade OI; Sennett C
    J Digit Imaging; 2012 Oct; 25(5):591-8. PubMed ID: 22246204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Computerized texture analysis of mammographic parenchymal patterns of digitized mammograms.
    Li H; Giger ML; Olopade OI; Margolis A; Lan L; Chinander MR
    Acad Radiol; 2005 Jul; 12(7):863-73. PubMed ID: 16039540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Deep learning in breast cancer risk assessment: evaluation of convolutional neural networks on a clinical dataset of full-field digital mammograms.
    Li H; Giger ML; Huynh BQ; Antropova NO
    J Med Imaging (Bellingham); 2017 Oct; 4(4):041304. PubMed ID: 28924576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Relationships between computer-extracted mammographic texture pattern features and BRCA1/2 mutation status: a cross-sectional study.
    Gierach GL; Li H; Loud JT; Greene MH; Chow CK; Lan L; Prindiville SA; Eng-Wong J; Soballe PW; Giambartolomei C; Mai PL; Galbo CE; Nichols K; Calzone KA; Olopade OI; Gail MH; Giger ML
    Breast Cancer Res; 2014; 16(4):424. PubMed ID: 25159706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Computerized analysis of mammographic parenchymal patterns for assessing breast cancer risk: effect of ROI size and location.
    Li H; Giger ML; Huo Z; Olopade OI; Lan L; Weber BL; Bonta I
    Med Phys; 2004 Mar; 31(3):549-55. PubMed ID: 15070253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Parenchymal texture analysis in digital mammography: A fully automated pipeline for breast cancer risk assessment.
    Zheng Y; Keller BM; Ray S; Wang Y; Conant EF; Gee JC; Kontos D
    Med Phys; 2015 Jul; 42(7):4149-60. PubMed ID: 26133615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Power spectral analysis of mammographic parenchymal patterns for breast cancer risk assessment.
    Li H; Giger ML; Olopade OI; Chinander MR
    J Digit Imaging; 2008 Jun; 21(2):145-52. PubMed ID: 18175183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Fractal analysis of mammographic parenchymal patterns in breast cancer risk assessment.
    Li H; Giger ML; Olopade OI; Lan L
    Acad Radiol; 2007 May; 14(5):513-21. PubMed ID: 17434064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Mammographic density and structural features can individually and jointly contribute to breast cancer risk assessment in mammography screening: a case-control study.
    Winkel RR; von Euler-Chelpin M; Nielsen M; Petersen K; Lillholm M; Nielsen MB; Lynge E; Uldall WY; Vejborg I
    BMC Cancer; 2016 Jul; 16():414. PubMed ID: 27387546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Mammographic parenchymal patterns as an imaging marker of endogenous hormonal exposure: a preliminary study in a high-risk population.
    Daye D; Keller B; Conant EF; Chen J; Schnall MD; Maidment AD; Kontos D
    Acad Radiol; 2013 May; 20(5):635-46. PubMed ID: 23570938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Beyond breast density: a review on the advancing role of parenchymal texture analysis in breast cancer risk assessment.
    Gastounioti A; Conant EF; Kontos D
    Breast Cancer Res; 2016 Sep; 18(1):91. PubMed ID: 27645219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Computerized analysis of mammographic parenchymal patterns for breast cancer risk assessment: feature selection.
    Huo Z; Giger ML; Wolverton DE; Zhong W; Cumming S; Olopade OI
    Med Phys; 2000 Jan; 27(1):4-12. PubMed ID: 10659732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Radiomic Phenotypes of Mammographic Parenchymal Complexity: Toward Augmenting Breast Density in Breast Cancer Risk Assessment.
    Kontos D; Winham SJ; Oustimov A; Pantalone L; Hsieh MK; Gastounioti A; Whaley DH; Hruska CB; Kerlikowske K; Brandt K; Conant EF; Vachon CM
    Radiology; 2019 Jan; 290(1):41-49. PubMed ID: 30375931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Clinical evaluation of a fully-automated parenchymal analysis software for breast cancer risk assessment: A pilot study in a Finnish sample.
    Pertuz S; Sassi A; Holli-Helenius K; Kämäräinen J; Rinta-Kiikka I; Lääperi AL; Arponen O
    Eur J Radiol; 2019 Dec; 121():108710. PubMed ID: 31689665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Image retrieval-based parenchymal analysis for breast cancer risk assessment.
    Padilla A; Arponen O; Rinta-Kiikka I; Pertuz S
    Med Phys; 2022 Feb; 49(2):1055-1064. PubMed ID: 34837254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Pilot study demonstrating potential association between breast cancer image-based risk phenotypes and genomic biomarkers.
    Li H; Giger ML; Sun C; Ponsukcharoen U; Huo D; Lan L; Olopade OI; Jamieson AR; Brown JB; Di Rienzo A
    Med Phys; 2014 Mar; 41(3):031917. PubMed ID: 24593735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Breast density and parenchymal texture measures as potential risk factors for Estrogen-Receptor positive breast cancer.
    Keller BM; Chen J; Conant EF; Kontos D
    Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng; 2014 Mar; 9035():90351D. PubMed ID: 25075270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Quantitative assessment of background parenchymal enhancement in breast MRI predicts response to risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy: preliminary evaluation in a cohort of BRCA1/2 mutation carriers.
    Wu S; Weinstein SP; DeLeo MJ; Conant EF; Chen J; Domchek SM; Kontos D
    Breast Cancer Res; 2015 May; 17():67. PubMed ID: 25986460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Breast parenchymal patterns in processed versus raw digital mammograms: A large population study toward assessing differences in quantitative measures across image representations.
    Gastounioti A; Oustimov A; Keller BM; Pantalone L; Hsieh MK; Conant EF; Kontos D
    Med Phys; 2016 Nov; 43(11):5862. PubMed ID: 27806604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.