140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26158077)
21. Improved image quality in digital mammography with image processing.
Baydush AH; Floyd CE
Med Phys; 2000 Jul; 27(7):1503-8. PubMed ID: 10947253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The relationship between the attenuation properties of breast microcalcifications and aluminum.
Zanca F; Van Ongeval C; Marshall N; Meylaers T; Michielsen K; Marchal G; Bosmans H
Phys Med Biol; 2010 Feb; 55(4):1057-68. PubMed ID: 20090185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Development and Monte Carlo analysis of antiscatter grids for mammography.
Boone JM; Makarova OV; Zyryanov VN; Tang CM; Mancini DC; Moldovan N; Divan R
Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2002 Dec; 1(6):441-7. PubMed ID: 12625771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. A combined analytical and Monte Carlo method for detailed simulations of antiscatter grids in x-ray medical imaging: implementing scatter within the grid.
Massera RT; Bosmans H; Rodriguez Perez S; Marshall N
Phys Med Biol; 2024 Mar; 69(7):. PubMed ID: 38382108
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Investigation of grid performance using simple image quality tests.
Bor D; Birgul O; Onal U; Olgar T
J Med Phys; 2016; 41(1):21-8. PubMed ID: 27051166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Transmission characteristics of a two dimensional antiscatter grid prototype for CBCT.
Altunbas C; Kavanagh B; Alexeev T; Miften M
Med Phys; 2017 Aug; 44(8):3952-3964. PubMed ID: 28513847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Dose optimization in pediatric cardiac x-ray imaging.
Gislason AJ; Davies AG; Cowen AR
Med Phys; 2010 Oct; 37(10):5258-69. PubMed ID: 21089760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Tailoring automatic exposure control toward constant detectability in digital mammography.
Salvagnini E; Bosmans H; Struelens L; Marshall NW
Med Phys; 2015 Jul; 42(7):3834-47. PubMed ID: 26133585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. A comparison of physical image quality of two hologic digital mammography systems that utilise linear and 2D anti-scatter grids.
Moore CS; Wood TJ; Saunderson JR; Beavis AW
Biomed Phys Eng Express; 2023 Aug; 9(5):. PubMed ID: 37473741
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Monte Carlo analysis of beam blocking grid design parameters: Scatter estimation and the importance of electron backscatter.
Bootsma GJ; Ren L; Zhang H; Jin JY; Jaffray DA
Med Phys; 2018 Mar; 45(3):1059-1070. PubMed ID: 29360154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Fully iterative scatter corrected digital breast tomosynthesis using GPU-based fast Monte Carlo simulation and composition ratio update.
Kim K; Lee T; Seong Y; Lee J; Jang KE; Choi J; Choi YW; Kim HH; Shin HJ; Cha JH; Cho S; Ye JC
Med Phys; 2015 Sep; 42(9):5342-55. PubMed ID: 26328983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Low dose high energy x-ray in-line phase sensitive imaging prototype: Investigation of optimal geometric conditions and design parameters.
Ghani MU; Yan A; Wong MD; Li Y; Ren L; Wu X; Liu H
J Xray Sci Technol; 2015; 23(6):667-82. PubMed ID: 26756405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Algorithmic scatter correction in dual-energy digital mammography.
Chen X; Nishikawa RM; Chan ST; Lau BA; Zhang L; Mou X
Med Phys; 2013 Nov; 40(11):111919. PubMed ID: 24320452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Directional scatter imaging for the stereoscopic tracking of fiducial markers in a single kV exposure.
Garnica-Garza HM
Med Phys; 2018 Feb; 45(2):703-713. PubMed ID: 29206280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Quantitative analysis of effects of the grid specifications on the quality of digital radiography images.
Lee S; Chung W
Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2019 Jun; 42(2):553-561. PubMed ID: 30989596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Performance and usefulness evaluation of a software-based scatter correction technique for mammographic images.
Kim K; Cho EI; Jeong HW; Lee Y
Heliyon; 2024 Jan; 10(2):e24862. PubMed ID: 38312677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Studies of performance of antiscatter grids in digital radiography: effect on signal-to-noise ratio.
Chan HP; Lam KL; Wu YZ
Med Phys; 1990; 17(4):655-64. PubMed ID: 2215411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Grid and slot scan scatter reduction in mammography: comparison by using Monte Carlo techniques.
Boone JM; Seibert JA; Tang CM; Lane SM
Radiology; 2002 Feb; 222(2):519-27. PubMed ID: 11818623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Impact on dose and image quality of a software-based scatter correction in mammography.
Monserrat T; Prieto E; Barbés B; Pina L; Elizalde A; Fernández B
Acta Radiol; 2018 Jun; 59(6):649-656. PubMed ID: 28870087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Efficiency of antiscatter grids for flat-detector CT.
Kyriakou Y; Kalender W
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Oct; 52(20):6275-93. PubMed ID: 17921585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
