These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26158077)

  • 61. Physical evaluation of prototype high-performance anti-scatter grids: potential for improved digital radiographic image quality.
    Fetterly KA; Schueler BA
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Jan; 54(2):N37-42. PubMed ID: 19098352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. A technique of scatter-glare correction using a digital filtration.
    Honda M; Ema T; Kikuchi K; Ohe M; Komatsu K
    Med Phys; 1993; 20(1):59-69. PubMed ID: 8455514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Phantoms for quality control procedures in digital breast tomosynthesis: dose assessment.
    Bouwman RW; Diaz O; van Engen RE; Young KC; den Heeten GJ; Broeders MJ; Veldkamp WJ; Dance DR
    Phys Med Biol; 2013 Jul; 58(13):4423-38. PubMed ID: 23756494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Measurement of effective detective quantum efficiency for a photon counting scanning mammography system and comparison with two flat panel full-field digital mammography systems.
    Wood TJ; Moore CS; Saunderson JR; Beavis AW
    Phys Med Biol; 2018 Jan; 63(2):025025. PubMed ID: 29260730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Investigation of the performance of antiscatter grids: Monte Carlo simulation studies.
    Chan HP; Doi K
    Phys Med Biol; 1982 Jun; 27(6):785-803. PubMed ID: 7111390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Dosimetric characterization and organ dose assessment in digital breast tomosynthesis: Measurements and Monte Carlo simulations using voxel phantoms.
    Baptista M; Di Maria S; Barros S; Figueira C; Sarmento M; Orvalho L; Vaz P
    Med Phys; 2015 Jul; 42(7):3788-800. PubMed ID: 26133581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Influence of anode/filter material and tube potential on contrast, signal-to-noise ratio and average absorbed dose in mammography: a Monte Carlo study.
    Dance DR; Thilander AK; Sandborg M; Skinner CL; Castellano IA; Carlsson GA
    Br J Radiol; 2000 Oct; 73(874):1056-67. PubMed ID: 11271898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. [Effect of Interspaces of Anti-scatter Grid on the Image Improvement Factor].
    Saito H; Asano H; Miyake H; Nakamura H; Imai Y; Ogura I; Negishi T
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2018; 74(10):1186-1193. PubMed ID: 30344216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Multiscale image processing and antiscatter grids in digital radiography.
    Lo WY; Hornof WJ; Zwingenberger AL; Robertson ID
    Vet Radiol Ultrasound; 2009; 50(6):569-76. PubMed ID: 19999338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Conversion of mammographic images to appear with the noise and sharpness characteristics of a different detector and x-ray system.
    Mackenzie A; Dance DR; Workman A; Yip M; Wells K; Young KC
    Med Phys; 2012 May; 39(5):2721-34. PubMed ID: 22559643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Optimal photon energy comparison between digital breast tomosynthesis and mammography: a case study.
    Di Maria S; Baptista M; Felix M; Oliveira N; Matela N; Janeiro L; Vaz P; Orvalho L; Silva A
    Phys Med; 2014 Jun; 30(4):482-8. PubMed ID: 24613514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Scatter dose calculation for anti-scatter linear grids in mammography.
    Al Kafi MA; Maalej N; Naqvi AA
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2009 Oct; 67(10):1837-41. PubMed ID: 19632851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. High-ratio grid considerations in mobile chest radiography.
    Scott AW; Gauntt DM; Yester MV; Barnes GT
    Med Phys; 2012 Jun; 39(6):3142-53. PubMed ID: 22755699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Total variation minimization filter for DBT imaging.
    Mota AM; Matela N; Oliveira N; Almeida P
    Med Phys; 2015 Jun; 42(6):2827-36. PubMed ID: 26127035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Technical note: a comparison of antiscatter grids for digital radiography.
    Court L; Yamazaki T
    Br J Radiol; 2004 Nov; 77(923):950-2. PubMed ID: 15507421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Evaluation of image quality in fluoroscopy by measurements and Monte Carlo calculations.
    Tapiovaara MJ; Sandborg M
    Phys Med Biol; 1995 Apr; 40(4):589-607. PubMed ID: 7610116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Rejection and redistribution of scattered radiation in scan equalization digital radiography (SEDR): simulation with spot images.
    Liu X; Shaw CC
    Med Phys; 2007 Jul; 34(7):2718-29. PubMed ID: 17821980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Acuros CTS: A fast, linear Boltzmann transport equation solver for computed tomography scatter - Part I: Core algorithms and validation.
    Maslowski A; Wang A; Sun M; Wareing T; Davis I; Star-Lack J
    Med Phys; 2018 May; 45(5):1899-1913. PubMed ID: 29509970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Effect of shaped filter design on dose and image quality in breast CT.
    Lück F; Kolditz D; Hupfer M; Kalender WA
    Phys Med Biol; 2013 Jun; 58(12):4205-23. PubMed ID: 23715466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. [Comparison of Contrast to Noise Ratio and Signal Difference to Noise Ratio Based on QA and QC Guidelines in CR Mammography].
    Nagami A; Ishii M; Ishii R; Kodama S; Sanada T; Yoshida A
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2016 Jun; 72(6):503-13. PubMed ID: 27320154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.