BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26158085)

  • 1. Mammographic density measurements are not affected by mammography system.
    Damases CN; Brennan PC; McEntee MF
    J Med Imaging (Bellingham); 2015 Jan; 2(1):015501. PubMed ID: 26158085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mammographic Breast Density Assessment Using Automated Volumetric Software and Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BIRADS) Categorization by Expert Radiologists.
    Damases CN; Brennan PC; Mello-Thoms C; McEntee MF
    Acad Radiol; 2016 Jan; 23(1):70-7. PubMed ID: 26514436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Inter-observer variability in mammographic density assessment using Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists (RANZCR) synoptic scales.
    Damases CN; Mello-Thoms C; McEntee MF
    J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2016 Jun; 60(3):329-36. PubMed ID: 27059785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Studying the association between longitudinal mammographic density measurements and breast cancer risk: a joint modelling approach.
    Illipse M; Czene K; Hall P; Humphreys K
    Breast Cancer Res; 2023 Jun; 25(1):64. PubMed ID: 37296473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Impact of errors in recorded compressed breast thickness measurements on volumetric density classification using volpara v1.5.0 software.
    Waade GG; Highnam R; Hauge IHR; McEntee MF; Hofvind S; Denton E; Kelly J; Sarwar JJ; Hogg P
    Med Phys; 2016 Jun; 43(6):2870-2876. PubMed ID: 27277035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Measuring mammographic density: comparing a fully automated volumetric assessment versus European radiologists' qualitative classification.
    Sartor H; Lång K; Rosso A; Borgquist S; Zackrisson S; Timberg P
    Eur Radiol; 2016 Dec; 26(12):4354-4360. PubMed ID: 27011371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Using an automated measure of breast density to explore the association between ethnicity and mammographic density in Australian women.
    Bell RJ; Evans J; Fox J; Pridmore V
    J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2019 Apr; 63(2):183-189. PubMed ID: 30623584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of variability in breast density assessment by BI-RADS category according to the level of experience.
    Eom HJ; Cha JH; Kang JW; Choi WJ; Kim HJ; Go E
    Acta Radiol; 2018 May; 59(5):527-532. PubMed ID: 28766978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of volumetric breast density on the risk of screen-detected and interval breast cancers: a cohort study.
    Wanders JOP; Holland K; Karssemeijer N; Peeters PHM; Veldhuis WB; Mann RM; van Gils CH
    Breast Cancer Res; 2017 Jun; 19(1):67. PubMed ID: 28583146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Quantitative texture analysis: robustness of radiomics across two digital mammography manufacturers' systems.
    Mendel KR; Li H; Lan L; Cahill CM; Rael V; Abe H; Giger ML
    J Med Imaging (Bellingham); 2018 Jan; 5(1):011002. PubMed ID: 28948196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Digital volumetric measurement of mammographic density and the risk of overlooking cancer in Japanese women.
    Sawada T; Akashi S; Nakamura S; Kuwayama T; Enokido K; Yoshida M; Hashimoto R; Ide T; Masuda H; Taruno K; Oyama H; Takamaru T; Kanada Y; Ikeda M; Kosugi N; Sato H; Nakayama S; Ata A; Tonouchi Y; Sakai H; Matsunaga Y; Matsutani A
    Breast Cancer; 2017 Sep; 24(5):708-713. PubMed ID: 28238177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on breast tissue composition: a longitudinal mammographic study with automated volumetric measurement.
    Jang HJ; Kim HJ; Chae YS; Lee SJ; Kim SH; Lee H; Kim WH
    Eur Radiol; 2020 Sep; 30(9):4785-4794. PubMed ID: 32314056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Breast Density Estimation with Fully Automated Volumetric Method: Comparison to Radiologists' Assessment by BI-RADS Categories.
    Singh T; Sharma M; Singla V; Khandelwal N
    Acad Radiol; 2016 Jan; 23(1):78-83. PubMed ID: 26521687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Mammographic density assessment: comparison of radiologists, automated volumetric measurement, and artificial intelligence-based computer-assisted diagnosis.
    Eom HJ; Cha JH; Choi WJ; Cho SM; Jin K; Kim HH
    Acta Radiol; 2024 Jun; ():2841851241257794. PubMed ID: 38825883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Lesion Segmentation in Automated 3D Breast Ultrasound: Volumetric Analysis.
    Agarwal R; Diaz O; Lladó X; Gubern-Mérida A; Vilanova JC; Martí R
    Ultrason Imaging; 2018 Mar; 40(2):97-112. PubMed ID: 29182056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Consistency of breast density categories in serial screening mammograms: A comparison between automated and human assessment.
    Holland K; van Zelst J; den Heeten GJ; Imhof-Tas M; Mann RM; van Gils CH; Karssemeijer N
    Breast; 2016 Oct; 29():49-54. PubMed ID: 27420382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of mammographic density estimation by Volpara software with radiologists' visual assessment: analysis of clinical-radiologic factors affecting discrepancy between them.
    Lee HN; Sohn YM; Han KH
    Acta Radiol; 2015 Sep; 56(9):1061-8. PubMed ID: 25338836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. High Mammographic Density in Long-Term Night-Shift Workers: DDM-Spain/Var-DDM.
    Pedraza-Flechas AM; Lope V; Sánchez-Contador C; Santamariña C; Pedraz-Pingarrón C; Moreo P; Ederra M; Miranda-García J; Vidal C; Llobet R; Aragonés N; Salas-Trejo D; Pollán M; Pérez-Gómez B;
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2017 Jun; 26(6):905-913. PubMed ID: 28336582
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of Qualitative and Volumetric Assessments of Breast Density and Analyses of Breast Compression Parameters and Breast Volume of Women in Bahcesehir Mammography Screening Project.
    Gemici AA; Arıbal E; Özaydın AN; Gürdal SÖ; Özçınar B; Cabioğlu N; Özmen V
    Eur J Breast Health; 2020 Apr; 16(2):110-116. PubMed ID: 32285032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Automated Volumetric Breast Density Measurements in the Era of the BI-RADS Fifth Edition: A Comparison With Visual Assessment.
    Youk JH; Gweon HM; Son EJ; Kim JA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2016 May; 206(5):1056-62. PubMed ID: 26934689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.