These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26158217)

  • 1. Sexual selection and cancer biology.
    Rubin JB
    Oncotarget; 2015 Jun; 6(18):15714-5. PubMed ID: 26158217
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sexual selection.
    Hosken DJ; House CM
    Curr Biol; 2011 Jan; 21(2):R62-5. PubMed ID: 21256434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Antagonistic responses to natural and sexual selection and the sex-specific evolution of cuticular hydrocarbons in Drosophila simulans.
    Sharma MD; Hunt J; Hosken DJ
    Evolution; 2012 Mar; 66(3):665-677. PubMed ID: 22380431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sexual selection, receiver biases, and the evolution of sex differences.
    Ryan MJ
    Science; 1998 Sep; 281(5385):1999-2003. PubMed ID: 9748154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sexual selection and the evolution of secondary sexual traits: sex comb evolution in Drosophila.
    Snook RR; Gidaszewski NA; Chapman T; Simmons LW
    J Evol Biol; 2013 Apr; 26(4):912-8. PubMed ID: 23496332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Female mate choice and runaway sexual selection.
    Harvey PH; Arnold SJ
    Nature; 1982 Jun; 297(5867):533-4. PubMed ID: 7088137
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reappraising sexual coevolution and the sex roles.
    Bonduriansky R
    PLoS Biol; 2009 Dec; 7(12):e1000255. PubMed ID: 19997498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Peak shifts and extinction under sex-specific selection.
    De Lisle SP
    Biol Lett; 2021 Oct; 17(10):20210278. PubMed ID: 34637639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sex-specific assumptions and their importance in models of sexual selection.
    de Vries C; Lehtonen J
    Trends Ecol Evol; 2023 Oct; 38(10):927-935. PubMed ID: 37246084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sexual dimorphism in lizard body shape: the roles of sexual selection and fecundity selection.
    Olsson M; Shine R; Wapstra E; Uivari B; Madsen T
    Evolution; 2002 Jul; 56(7):1538-42. PubMed ID: 12206252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Is sexual selection defined by dimorphism alone? A reply to Padian and Horner.
    Knell RJ; Naish D; Tomkins JL; Hone DW
    Trends Ecol Evol; 2013 May; 28(5):250-1. PubMed ID: 23561321
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sexual selection: a dynamic state of affairs. Response to the comments of Cornwallis and Uller in the article: towards an evolutionary ecology of sexual traits.
    Safran RJ; Vitousek MN; Hauber ME; Ghalambor CK
    Trends Ecol Evol; 2010 Aug; 25(8):429-30; author reply 430-1. PubMed ID: 20452087
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Signal trait sexual dimorphism and mutual sexual selection in Drosophila serrata.
    Chenoweth SF; Blows MW
    Evolution; 2003 Oct; 57(10):2326-34. PubMed ID: 14628920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sexual selection and genital evolution: an overview.
    Shamloul R; el-Sakka A; Bella AJ
    J Sex Med; 2010 May; 7(5):1734-40. PubMed ID: 20214717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Misconceptions of sexual selection and species recognition: a response to Knell et al. and to Mendelson and Shaw.
    Padian K; Horner JR
    Trends Ecol Evol; 2013 May; 28(5):249-50. PubMed ID: 23453049
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The evolutionary significance of sexual selection.
    Engen S; Saether BE
    J Theor Biol; 1985 Nov; 117(2):277-89. PubMed ID: 4079450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evolution of mating preference and sexual dimorphism.
    Lande R; Arnold SJ
    J Theor Biol; 1985 Dec; 117(4):651-64. PubMed ID: 4094458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Degree of anisogamy is unrelated to the intensity of sexual selection.
    Mokos J; Scheuring I; Liker A; Freckleton RP; Székely T
    Sci Rep; 2021 Sep; 11(1):19424. PubMed ID: 34593863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sexual conflict as a partitioning of selection.
    Westneat DF; Sih A
    Biol Lett; 2009 Oct; 5(5):675-7. PubMed ID: 19443511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evolution. The benefits of allocating sex.
    West SA; Herre EA; Sheldon BC
    Science; 2000 Oct; 290(5490):288-90. PubMed ID: 11183376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.