These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
344 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26158542)
1. Evaluation of a consumer fitness-tracking device to assess sleep in adults. de Zambotti M; Claudatos S; Inkelis S; Colrain IM; Baker FC Chronobiol Int; 2015; 32(7):1024-8. PubMed ID: 26158542 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A validation study of Fitbit Charge 2™ compared with polysomnography in adults. de Zambotti M; Goldstone A; Claudatos S; Colrain IM; Baker FC Chronobiol Int; 2018 Apr; 35(4):465-476. PubMed ID: 29235907 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of Commercial Wrist-Based and Smartphone Accelerometers, Actigraphy, and PSG in a Clinical Cohort of Children and Adolescents. Toon E; Davey MJ; Hollis SL; Nixon GM; Horne RS; Biggs SN J Clin Sleep Med; 2016 Mar; 12(3):343-50. PubMed ID: 26446248 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Validation of Sleep-Tracking Technology Compared with Polysomnography in Adolescents. de Zambotti M; Baker FC; Colrain IM Sleep; 2015 Sep; 38(9):1461-8. PubMed ID: 26158896 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Validity, potential clinical utility, and comparison of consumer and research-grade activity trackers in Insomnia Disorder I: In-lab validation against polysomnography. Kahawage P; Jumabhoy R; Hamill K; de Zambotti M; Drummond SPA J Sleep Res; 2020 Feb; 29(1):e12931. PubMed ID: 31626361 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Agreement of different methods for assessing sleep characteristics: a comparison of two actigraphs, wrist and hip placement, and self-report with polysomnography. Zinkhan M; Berger K; Hense S; Nagel M; Obst A; Koch B; Penzel T; Fietze I; Ahrens W; Young P; Happe S; Kantelhardt JW; Kluttig A; Schmidt-Pokrzywniak A; Pillmann F; Stang A Sleep Med; 2014 Sep; 15(9):1107-14. PubMed ID: 25018025 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Validation of the Sleep-Wake Scoring of a New Wrist-Worn Sleep Monitoring Device. Pigeon WR; Taylor M; Bui A; Oleynk C; Walsh P; Bishop TM J Clin Sleep Med; 2018 Jun; 14(6):1057-1062. PubMed ID: 29852899 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Direct comparison of two actigraphy devices with polysomnographically recorded naps in healthy young adults. Cellini N; Buman MP; McDevitt EA; Ricker AA; Mednick SC Chronobiol Int; 2013 Jun; 30(5):691-8. PubMed ID: 23721120 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Validation of a Consumer Sleep Wearable Device With Actigraphy and Polysomnography in Adolescents Across Sleep Opportunity Manipulations. Lee XK; Chee NIYN; Ong JL; Teo TB; van Rijn E; Lo JC; Chee MWL J Clin Sleep Med; 2019 Sep; 15(9):1337-1346. PubMed ID: 31538605 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The Sleep of the Ring: Comparison of the ŌURA Sleep Tracker Against Polysomnography. de Zambotti M; Rosas L; Colrain IM; Baker FC Behav Sleep Med; 2019; 17(2):124-136. PubMed ID: 28323455 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Performance of Fitbit Charge 3 against polysomnography in measuring sleep in adolescent boys and girls. Menghini L; Yuksel D; Goldstone A; Baker FC; de Zambotti M Chronobiol Int; 2021 Jul; 38(7):1010-1022. PubMed ID: 33792456 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Development and Evaluation of a Wearable Device for Sleep Quality Assessment. Kuo CE; Liu YC; Chang DW; Young CP; Shaw FZ; Liang SF IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2017 Jul; 64(7):1547-1557. PubMed ID: 28113301 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Performance of seven consumer sleep-tracking devices compared with polysomnography. Chinoy ED; Cuellar JA; Huwa KE; Jameson JT; Watson CH; Bessman SC; Hirsch DA; Cooper AD; Drummond SPA; Markwald RR Sleep; 2021 May; 44(5):. PubMed ID: 33378539 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Improving Sleep Quality Assessment Using Wearable Sensors by Including Information From Postural/Sleep Position Changes and Body Acceleration: A Comparison of Chest-Worn Sensors, Wrist Actigraphy, and Polysomnography. Razjouyan J; Lee H; Parthasarathy S; Mohler J; Sharafkhaneh A; Najafi B J Clin Sleep Med; 2017 Nov; 13(11):1301-1310. PubMed ID: 28992827 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Utility of the Fitbit Flex to evaluate sleep in major depressive disorder: A comparison against polysomnography and wrist-worn actigraphy. Cook JD; Prairie ML; Plante DT J Affect Disord; 2017 Aug; 217():299-305. PubMed ID: 28448949 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Alternatives to polysomnography (PSG): a validation of wrist actigraphy and a partial-PSG system. Kosmadopoulos A; Sargent C; Darwent D; Zhou X; Roach GD Behav Res Methods; 2014 Dec; 46(4):1032-41. PubMed ID: 24442593 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Ability of the Multisensory Jawbone UP3 to Quantify and Classify Sleep in Patients With Suspected Central Disorders of Hypersomnolence: A Comparison Against Polysomnography and Actigraphy. Cook JD; Prairie ML; Plante DT J Clin Sleep Med; 2018 May; 14(5):841-848. PubMed ID: 29734975 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Selecting a sleep tracker from EEG-based, iteratively improved, low-cost multisensor, and actigraphy-only devices. Ong JL; Golkashani HA; Ghorbani S; Wong KF; Chee NIYN; Willoughby AR; Chee MWL Sleep Health; 2024 Feb; 10(1):9-23. PubMed ID: 38087674 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Validation of sleep measurement in a multisensor consumer grade wearable device in healthy young adults. Kanady JC; Ruoff L; Straus LD; Varbel J; Metzler T; Richards A; Inslicht SS; O'Donovan A; Hlavin J; Neylan TC J Clin Sleep Med; 2020 Jun; 16(6):917-924. PubMed ID: 32048595 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The wrist is not the brain: Estimation of sleep by clinical and consumer wearable actigraphy devices is impacted by multiple patient- and device-specific factors. Danzig R; Wang M; Shah A; Trotti LM J Sleep Res; 2020 Feb; 29(1):e12926. PubMed ID: 31621129 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]