BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

91 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26158988)

  • 1. Perspectives on Preference Aggregation.
    Regenwetter M
    Perspect Psychol Sci; 2009 Jul; 4(4):403-7. PubMed ID: 26158988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Health care systems and impossibility theorems].
    Penchas S
    Harefuah; 2004 Feb; 143(2):126-30, 166. PubMed ID: 15143703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The unexpected empirical consensus among consensus methods.
    Regenwetter M; Kim A; Kantor A; Ho MH
    Psychol Sci; 2007 Jul; 18(7):629-35. PubMed ID: 17614872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Behavioural social choice: a status report.
    Regenwetter M; Grofman B; Popova A; Messner W; Davis-Stober CP; Cavagnaro DR
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2009 Mar; 364(1518):833-43. PubMed ID: 19073478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [The origin of informed consent].
    Mallardi V
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital; 2005 Oct; 25(5):312-27. PubMed ID: 16602332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Risk management frameworks for human health and environmental risks.
    Jardine C; Hrudey S; Shortreed J; Craig L; Krewski D; Furgal C; McColl S
    J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev; 2003; 6(6):569-720. PubMed ID: 14698953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. What Differences Make a Difference? The Promise and Reality of Diverse Teams in Organizations.
    Mannix E; Neale MA
    Psychol Sci Public Interest; 2005 Oct; 6(2):31-55. PubMed ID: 26158478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Preferences and person trade-offs: forcing consistency or inconsistency in health-related quality of life measures?
    Mansley EC; Elbasha EH
    Health Econ; 2003 Mar; 12(3):187-98. PubMed ID: 12605464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Behavioral variability of choices versus structural inconsistency of preferences.
    Regenwetter M; Davis-Stober CP
    Psychol Rev; 2012 Apr; 119(2):408-16. PubMed ID: 22506679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Judgment and decision making.
    Mellers BA; Schwartz A; Cooke AD
    Annu Rev Psychol; 1998; 49():447-77. PubMed ID: 9496629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Foundations of the new phylogenetics].
    Pavlinov IIa
    Zh Obshch Biol; 2004; 65(4):334-66. PubMed ID: 15490579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Why bother with the brain? A role for decision neuroscience in understanding strategic variability.
    Venkatraman V
    Prog Brain Res; 2013; 202():267-88. PubMed ID: 23317837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Quantifying benefit-risk preferences for medical interventions: an overview of a growing empirical literature.
    Brett Hauber A; Fairchild AO; Reed Johnson F
    Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2013 Aug; 11(4):319-29. PubMed ID: 23637054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. "The casual cruelty of our prejudices": on Walter Lippmann's theory of stereotype and its "obliteration" in psychology and social science.
    Bottom WP; Kong DT
    J Hist Behav Sci; 2012; 48(4):363-94. PubMed ID: 22936385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Can science survive in the modern age?
    Brooks H
    Science; 1971 Oct; 174(4004):21-30. PubMed ID: 17755684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Queuing theory under competitive social foraging may explain a mathematical equivalence of delay and probability in impulsive decision-making.
    Takahashi T
    Med Hypotheses; 2006; 67(2):276-9. PubMed ID: 16574335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Preference for oddity: uniqueness heuristic or hierarchical choice process?
    Waite TA
    Anim Cogn; 2008 Oct; 11(4):707-13. PubMed ID: 18528719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A Primer of Social Decision Scheme Theory: Models of Group Influence, Competitive Model-Testing, and Prospective Modeling.
    Stasser G
    Organ Behav Hum Decis Process; 1999 Oct; 80(1):3-20. PubMed ID: 10508565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. How reinforcer type affects choice in economic games.
    Fantino E; Gaitan S; Kennelly A; Stolarz-Fantino S
    Behav Processes; 2007 Jun; 75(2):107-14. PubMed ID: 17353099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The role of behavioral economics and behavioral decision making in Americans' retirement savings decisions.
    Knoll MA
    Soc Secur Bull; 2010; 70(4):1-23. PubMed ID: 21261167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.