These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26159575)

  • 1. Design of linear anti-scatter grid geometry with optimum performance for screen-film and digital mammography systems.
    Khodajou-Chokami H; Sohrabpour M
    Phys Med Biol; 2015 Aug; 60(15):5753-65. PubMed ID: 26159575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Scatter dose calculation for anti-scatter linear grids in mammography.
    Al Kafi MA; Maalej N; Naqvi AA
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2009 Oct; 67(10):1837-41. PubMed ID: 19632851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Development and Monte Carlo analysis of antiscatter grids for mammography.
    Boone JM; Makarova OV; Zyryanov VN; Tang CM; Mancini DC; Moldovan N; Divan R
    Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2002 Dec; 1(6):441-7. PubMed ID: 12625771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of scatter-to-primary ratio, grid performance and normalized average glandular dose in mammography by Monte Carlo simulation including interference and energy broadening effects.
    Cunha DM; Tomal A; Poletti ME
    Phys Med Biol; 2010 Aug; 55(15):4335-59. PubMed ID: 20647608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Grid and slot scan scatter reduction in mammography: comparison by using Monte Carlo techniques.
    Boone JM; Seibert JA; Tang CM; Lane SM
    Radiology; 2002 Feb; 222(2):519-27. PubMed ID: 11818623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Characterization of scatter in digital mammography from use of Monte Carlo simulations and comparison to physical measurements.
    Leon SM; Brateman LF; Wagner LK
    Med Phys; 2014 Nov; 41(11):111914. PubMed ID: 25370647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Quantification of scattered radiation in projection mammography: four practical methods compared.
    Salvagnini E; Bosmans H; Struelens L; Marshall NW
    Med Phys; 2012 Jun; 39(6):3167-80. PubMed ID: 22755701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of scatter and an antiscatter grid on the performance of a slot-scanning digital mammography system.
    Shen SZ; Bloomquist AK; Mawdsley GE; Yaffe MJ; Elbakri I
    Med Phys; 2006 Apr; 33(4):1108-15. PubMed ID: 16696488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A semi-empirical model for scatter field reduction in digital mammography.
    Marimón E; Marsden PA; Nait-Charif H; Díaz O
    Phys Med Biol; 2021 Feb; 66(4):045001. PubMed ID: 33296884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Improved image quality in digital mammography with image processing.
    Baydush AH; Floyd CE
    Med Phys; 2000 Jul; 27(7):1503-8. PubMed ID: 10947253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Ultra-high-strip-density radiographic grids: a new antiscatter technique for mammography.
    Chan HP; Frank PH; Doi K; Iida N; Higashida Y
    Radiology; 1985 Mar; 154(3):807-15. PubMed ID: 3969487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Fully iterative scatter corrected digital breast tomosynthesis using GPU-based fast Monte Carlo simulation and composition ratio update.
    Kim K; Lee T; Seong Y; Lee J; Jang KE; Choi J; Choi YW; Kim HH; Shin HJ; Cha JH; Cho S; Ye JC
    Med Phys; 2015 Sep; 42(9):5342-55. PubMed ID: 26328983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Physical evaluation of prototype high-performance anti-scatter grids: potential for improved digital radiographic image quality.
    Fetterly KA; Schueler BA
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Jan; 54(2):N37-42. PubMed ID: 19098352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Monte Carlo study of grid performance in diagnostic radiology: task dependent optimization for screen-film imaging.
    Sandborg M; Dance DR; Carlsson GA; Persliden J
    Br J Radiol; 1994 Jan; 67(793):76-85. PubMed ID: 8298879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A Monte Carlo study of grid performance in diagnostic radiology: task-dependent optimization for digital imaging.
    Sandborg M; Dance DR; Carlsson GA; Persliden J; Tapiovaara MJ
    Phys Med Biol; 1994 Oct; 39(10):1659-76. PubMed ID: 15551537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Monte Carlo analysis of beam blocking grid design parameters: Scatter estimation and the importance of electron backscatter.
    Bootsma GJ; Ren L; Zhang H; Jin JY; Jaffray DA
    Med Phys; 2018 Mar; 45(3):1059-1070. PubMed ID: 29360154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Characterization of scatter in digital mammography from physical measurements.
    Leon SM; Brateman LF; Wagner LK
    Med Phys; 2014 Jun; 41(6):061901. PubMed ID: 24877812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Investigation of grid performance using simple image quality tests.
    Bor D; Birgul O; Onal U; Olgar T
    J Med Phys; 2016; 41(1):21-8. PubMed ID: 27051166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of automated CDMAM readings for non-standard CDMAM imaging conditions: grid-less acquisitions and scatter correction.
    Binst J; Sterckx B; Bemelmans F; Cockmartin L; Van Peteghem N; Marshall N; Bosmans H
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Jul; 165(1-4):350-3. PubMed ID: 25821214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Technical note: a comparison of antiscatter grids for digital radiography.
    Court L; Yamazaki T
    Br J Radiol; 2004 Nov; 77(923):950-2. PubMed ID: 15507421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.