These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26160753)

  • 1. Exclusion probabilities and likelihood ratios with applications to mixtures.
    Slooten KJ; Egeland T
    Int J Legal Med; 2016 Jan; 130(1):39-57. PubMed ID: 26160753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Exclusion probabilities and likelihood ratios with applications to kinship problems.
    Slooten KJ; Egeland T
    Int J Legal Med; 2014 May; 128(3):415-25. PubMed ID: 24281752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Distinguishing between donors and their relatives in complex DNA mixtures with binary models.
    Slooten K
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 Mar; 21():95-109. PubMed ID: 26745184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Complex DNA mixture analysis in a forensic context: evaluating the probative value using a likelihood ratio model.
    Haned H; Benschop CCG; Gill PD; Sijen T
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2015 May; 16():17-25. PubMed ID: 25485478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Inclusion probability with dropout: an operational formula.
    Milot E; Courteau J; Crispino F; Mailly F
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2015 May; 16():71-76. PubMed ID: 25559642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Accurate assessment of the weight of evidence for DNA mixtures by integrating the likelihood ratio.
    Slooten K
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2017 Mar; 27():1-16. PubMed ID: 27914277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Impact of allelic dropout on evidential value of forensic DNA profiles using RMNE.
    Van Nieuwerburgh F; Goetghebeur E; Vandewoestyne M; Deforce D
    Bioinformatics; 2009 Jan; 25(2):225-9. PubMed ID: 19029128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of large-scale highly polymorphic microhaplotypes in complex DNA mixtures analysis using RMNE method.
    Zhu Q; Wang H; Cao Y; Huang Y; Wei Y; Hu Y; Dai X; Shan T; Wang Y; Zhang J
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2023 Jul; 65():102874. PubMed ID: 37075688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Interpreting low template DNA profiles.
    Balding DJ; Buckleton J
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2009 Dec; 4(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 19948328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Familial searching on DNA mixtures with dropout.
    Slooten K
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 May; 22():128-138. PubMed ID: 26905597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Validation of a DNA mixture statistics tool incorporating allelic drop-out and drop-in.
    Mitchell AA; Tamariz J; O'Connell K; Ducasse N; Budimlija Z; Prinz M; Caragine T
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2012 Dec; 6(6):749-61. PubMed ID: 22999739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Application of random match probability calculations to mixed STR profiles.
    Bille T; Bright JA; Buckleton J
    J Forensic Sci; 2013 Mar; 58(2):474-85. PubMed ID: 23425220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. CEESIt: A computational tool for the interpretation of STR mixtures.
    Swaminathan H; Garg A; Grgicak CM; Medard M; Lun DS
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 May; 22():149-160. PubMed ID: 26946255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of multiple allelic drop-outs in forensic RMNE calculations.
    Christophe VN; Dieter D; Filip VN
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2015 Nov; 19():243-249. PubMed ID: 26280568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Exploratory data analysis for the interpretation of low template DNA mixtures.
    Haned H; Slooten K; Gill P
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2012 Dec; 6(6):762-74. PubMed ID: 22981542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An assessment of the information content of likelihood ratios derived from complex mixtures.
    Marsden CD; Rudin N; Inman K; Lohmueller KE
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 May; 22():64-72. PubMed ID: 26851613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Interpretation of complex DNA profiles using empirical models and a method to measure their robustness.
    Gill P; Curran J; Neumann C; Kirkham A; Clayton T; Whitaker J; Lambert J
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2008 Mar; 2(2):91-103. PubMed ID: 19083804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Relaxing the assumption of unrelatedness in the numerator and denominator of likelihood ratios for DNA mixtures.
    Allen PS; Pugh SN; Bright JA; Taylor DA; Curran JM; Kerr Z; Buckleton JS
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2021 Mar; 51():102434. PubMed ID: 33348219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Forensic identification of an individual in complex DNA mixtures.
    Voskoboinik L; Darvasi A
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2011 Nov; 5(5):428-35. PubMed ID: 20888313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Exact computation of the distribution of likelihood ratios with forensic applications.
    Dørum G; Bleka Ø; Gill P; Haned H; Snipen L; Sæbø S; Egeland T
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2014 Mar; 9():93-101. PubMed ID: 24528587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.