These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26161029)

  • 21. The Emergence of Clinical Research Ethics Consultation: Insights From a National Collaborative.
    Porter KM; Danis M; Taylor HA; Cho MK; Wilfond BS;
    Am J Bioeth; 2018 Jan; 18(1):39-45. PubMed ID: 29313771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Electronic informed consent criteria for research ethics review: a scoping review.
    Yusof MYPM; Teo CH; Ng CJ
    BMC Med Ethics; 2022 Nov; 23(1):117. PubMed ID: 36414962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Ethical consideration of the research proposal and the informed-consent process: An online survey of researchers and ethics committee members in Thailand.
    Kaewkungwal J; Adams P
    Account Res; 2019 Apr; 26(3):176-197. PubMed ID: 30987450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Understanding Broad Consent.
    Maloy JW; Bass PF
    Ochsner J; 2020; 20(1):81-86. PubMed ID: 32284687
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Awareness and Acceptable Practices: IRB and Researcher Reflections on the Havasupai Lawsuit.
    Garrison NA; Cho MK
    AJOB Prim Res; 2013 Oct; 4(4):55-63. PubMed ID: 24089655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Perceptions and experiences of community members serving on institutional review boards: a questionnaire based study.
    Kuyare MS; Marathe PA; Kuyare SS; Thatte UM
    HEC Forum; 2015 Mar; 27(1):61-77. PubMed ID: 25600845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. How US institutional review boards decide when researchers need to translate studies.
    Klitzman R
    J Med Ethics; 2014 Mar; 40(3):193-7. PubMed ID: 23475805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Improved participants' understanding of research information in real settings using the SIDCER informed consent form: a randomized-controlled informed consent study nested with eight clinical trials.
    Koonrungsesomboon N; Tharavanij T; Phiphatpatthamaamphan K; Vilaichone RK; Manuwong S; Curry P; Siramolpiwat S; Punchaipornpon T; Kanitnate S; Tammachote N; Yamprasert R; Chanvimalueng W; Kaewkumpai R; Netanong S; Kitipawong P; Sritipsukho P; Karbwang J
    Eur J Clin Pharmacol; 2017 Feb; 73(2):141-149. PubMed ID: 27838760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Ethics of medical scientific research: informed consent and the therapeutic misconception].
    de Vries MC; van Leeuwen E
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2008 Mar; 152(12):679-83. PubMed ID: 18438063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Awareness of Jordanian Investigators About the Importance of Ethics Review Committees: A Pilot Study.
    Rababa'h AM; Alzoubi KH; Ababneh M; Khabour OF
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2020 Apr; 26(2):821-831. PubMed ID: 31571048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Data and tissue research without patient consent: A qualitative study of the views of research ethics committees in New Zealand.
    Ballantyne A; Moore A
    AJOB Empir Bioeth; 2018; 9(3):143-153. PubMed ID: 30407144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Inconsistency and institutional review boards.
    Goldman J; Katz MD
    JAMA; 1982 Jul; 248(2):197-202. PubMed ID: 7045428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Individual genetic and genomic research results and the tradition of informed consent: exploring US review board guidance.
    Simon C; Shinkunas LA; Brandt D; Williams JK
    J Med Ethics; 2012 Jul; 38(7):417-22. PubMed ID: 22361295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Researcher and study participants' perspectives of consent in clinical studies in four referral hospitals in Vietnam.
    Van Nuil JI; Nguyen TTT; Le Nguyen TN; Nguyen VVC; Chambers M; Ta TDN; Merson L; Nguyen TPD; Hoang MTV; Parker M; Bull S; Kestelyn E
    BMC Med Ethics; 2020 Jan; 21(1):4. PubMed ID: 31924199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Clinical Research in Vulnerable Populations: Variability and Focus of Institutional Review Boards' Responses.
    Kästner B; Behre S; Lutz N; Bürger F; Luntz S; Hinderhofer K; Bendszus M; Hoffmann GF; Ries M
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(8):e0135997. PubMed ID: 26275228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Those Responsible for Approving Research Studies Have Poor Knowledge of Research Study Design: a Knowledge Assessment of Institutional Review Board Members.
    Mhaskar R; Pathak EB; Wieten S; Guterbock TM; Kumar A; Djulbegovic B
    Acta Inform Med; 2015 Aug; 23(4):196-201. PubMed ID: 26483590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. IRB-identified ethical issues in nursing research.
    Olsen DP; Mahrenholz D
    J Prof Nurs; 2000; 16(3):140-8. PubMed ID: 10860312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Conducting Health Disparities Research with Criminal Justice Populations: Examining Research, Ethics, and Participation.
    Valera P; Cook S; Macklin R; Chang Y
    Ethics Behav; 2014 Mar; 24(2):164-174. PubMed ID: 25045243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The views of quality improvement professionals and comparative effectiveness researchers on ethics, IRBs, and oversight.
    Whicher D; Kass N; Saghai Y; Faden R; Tunis S; Pronovost P
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2015 Apr; 10(2):132-44. PubMed ID: 25742674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Researchers' views on, and experiences with, the requirement to obtain informed consent in research involving human participants: a qualitative study.
    Xu A; Baysari MT; Stocker SL; Leow LJ; Day RO; Carland JE
    BMC Med Ethics; 2020 Oct; 21(1):93. PubMed ID: 33008387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.