These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2616138)

  • 1. Contrast sensitivity for letter and grating targets under various stimulus conditions.
    Herse PR; Bedell HE
    Optom Vis Sci; 1989 Nov; 66(11):774-81. PubMed ID: 2616138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of dioptric blur on Snellen and grating acuity.
    Thorn F; Schwartz F
    Optom Vis Sci; 1990 Jan; 67(1):3-7. PubMed ID: 2308749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of dioptric blur on the Vistech contrast sensitivity test.
    Thorn F
    Optom Vis Sci; 1990 Jan; 67(1):8-12. PubMed ID: 2308756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparison of contrast sensitivity and sweep visual evoked potential (sVEP) acuity estimates in normal humans.
    Ridder WH
    Doc Ophthalmol; 2019 Dec; 139(3):207-219. PubMed ID: 31414313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Recognition thresholds for letters with simulated dioptric blur.
    Akutsu H; Bedell HE; Patel SS
    Optom Vis Sci; 2000 Oct; 77(10):524-30. PubMed ID: 11100890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effect of exposure duration on visual acuity for letter optotypes and gratings.
    McAnany JJ
    Vision Res; 2014 Dec; 105():86-91. PubMed ID: 25281413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effects of blur and eccentric viewing on adult acuity for pediatric tests: implications for amblyopia detection.
    Formankiewicz MA; Waugh SJ
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2013 Oct; 54(10):6934-43. PubMed ID: 24071956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Measuring resolution in the contrast domain: the small letter contrast test.
    Rabin J; Wicks J
    Optom Vis Sci; 1996 Jun; 73(6):398-403. PubMed ID: 8807651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of visual blur on contrast sensitivity. Clinical implications.
    Marmor MF; Gawande A
    Ophthalmology; 1988 Jan; 95(1):139-43. PubMed ID: 3344122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Can sinusoidal vernier acuity be predicted by contrast discrimination?
    Hu Q; Klein SA; Carney T
    Vision Res; 1993 Jun; 33(9):1241-58. PubMed ID: 8333172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Optical defocus: differential effects on size and contrast letter recognition thresholds.
    Rabin J
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1994 Feb; 35(2):646-8. PubMed ID: 8113015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Differences in the legibility of letters at contrast threshold using the Pelli-Robson chart.
    Elliott DB; Whitaker D; Bonette L
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1990 Oct; 10(4):323-6. PubMed ID: 2263364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of dioptric blur on Snellen and grating acuity.
    Press LJ
    Optom Vis Sci; 1990 Apr; 67(4):312. PubMed ID: 2342794
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Ohio Contrast Cards: Visual Performance in a Pediatric Low-vision Site.
    Hopkins GR; Dougherty BE; Brown AM
    Optom Vis Sci; 2017 Oct; 94(10):946-956. PubMed ID: 28972542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Line-by-line visual acuity scoring equivalence with letter-by-letter visual acuity scoring.
    Ng JS; Wong A
    Clin Exp Optom; 2022 May; 105(4):414-419. PubMed ID: 34139959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Contrast sensitivity for letter optotypes vs. gratings under conditions biased toward parvocellular and magnocellular pathways.
    McAnany JJ; Alexander KR
    Vision Res; 2006 May; 46(10):1574-84. PubMed ID: 16213001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessment of contrast sensitivity of patients with macular disease using reduced contrast near visual acuity charts.
    Greeves AL; Cole BL; Jacobs RJ
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1988; 8(4):371-7. PubMed ID: 3253627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Test-retest variability and correlations between tests of texture processing, motion processing, visual acuity, and contrast sensitivity.
    Simpson TL; Regan D
    Optom Vis Sci; 1995 Jan; 72(1):11-6. PubMed ID: 7731649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Discrimination of position and contrast in amblyopic and peripheral vision.
    Levi DM; Klein SA; Wang H
    Vision Res; 1994 Dec; 34(24):3293-313. PubMed ID: 7863615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Predicting individual contrast sensitivity functions from acuity and letter contrast sensitivity measurements.
    Thurman SM; Davey PG; McCray KL; Paronian V; Seitz AR
    J Vis; 2016 Dec; 16(15):15. PubMed ID: 28006065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.