These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26161524)

  • 1. Hearing Loss: Hearing Augmentation.
    Atcherson SR; Moreland C; Zazove P; McKee MM
    FP Essent; 2015 Jul; 434():18-23. PubMed ID: 26161524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Objective and perceptual comparisons of two bluetooth hearing aid assistive devices.
    Clark JL; Pustejovsky C; Vanneste S
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2017 Aug; 12(6):614-617. PubMed ID: 27377435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evidence for the use of hearing assistive technology by adults: the role of the FM system.
    Chisolm TH; Noe CM; McArdle R; Abrams H
    Trends Amplif; 2007 Jun; 11(2):73-89. PubMed ID: 17494874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of Carina active middle-ear implant with conventional hearing aids for mixed hearing loss.
    Savaş VA; Gündüz B; Karamert R; Cevizci R; Düzlü M; Tutar H; Bayazit YA
    J Laryngol Otol; 2016 Apr; 130(4):340-3. PubMed ID: 26991874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Application and usage of tactile aid in Iran.
    Karimi-Yazdi A; Sazgar AA; Nadimi-Tehran A; Faramarzi A; Nassaj FE; Yahyavi S
    Arch Iran Med; 2006 Oct; 9(4):344-7. PubMed ID: 17061607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Impact of floating mass transducer coupling and positioning in round window vibroplasty.
    Rajan GP; Lampacher P; Ambett R; Dittrich G; Kuthubutheen J; Wood B; McArthur A; Marino R
    Otol Neurotol; 2011 Feb; 32(2):271-7. PubMed ID: 21206391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Audiological and subjective benefit results in bone-anchored hearing device users.
    Boleas-Aguirre MS; Bulnes Plano MD; de Erenchun Lasa IR; Ibáñez Beroiz B
    Otol Neurotol; 2012 Jun; 33(4):494-503. PubMed ID: 22472615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Deafness in cochlear and auditory nerve disorders.
    Hopkins K
    Handb Clin Neurol; 2015; 129():479-94. PubMed ID: 25726286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Patient Outcomes in Magnet-Based Implantable Auditory Assist Devices.
    O'Niel MB; Runge CL; Friedland DR; Kerschner JE
    JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2014 Jun; 140(6):513-20. PubMed ID: 24763485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of 2 implantable bone conduction devices in patients with single-sided deafness using a daily alternating method.
    Desmet JB; Wouters K; De Bodt M; Van de Heyning P
    Otol Neurotol; 2012 Aug; 33(6):1018-26. PubMed ID: 22772008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Digital processing technology for bone-anchored hearing aids: randomised comparison of two devices in hearing aid users with mixed or conductive hearing loss.
    Hill-Feltham P; Roberts SA; Gladdis R
    J Laryngol Otol; 2014 Feb; 128(2):119-27. PubMed ID: 24524414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Fully implantable hearing aids in patients with congenital auricular atresia.
    Siegert R; Mattheis S; Kasic J
    Laryngoscope; 2007 Feb; 117(2):336-40. PubMed ID: 17277630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of stimulus level on the speech perception abilities of children using cochlear implants or digital hearing aids.
    Davidson LS
    Ear Hear; 2006 Oct; 27(5):493-507. PubMed ID: 16957500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Implantable hearing devices.
    Jones S; Harris D; Estill A; Mikulec AA
    Mo Med; 2008; 105(3):235-9. PubMed ID: 18630303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparisons of sound processors based on osseointegrated implants in patients with conductive or mixed hearing loss.
    Pfiffner F; Caversaccio MD; Kompis M
    Otol Neurotol; 2011 Jul; 32(5):728-35. PubMed ID: 21646934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The benefits of remote microphone technology for adults with cochlear implants.
    Fitzpatrick EM; Séguin C; Schramm DR; Armstrong S; Chénier J
    Ear Hear; 2009 Oct; 30(5):590-9. PubMed ID: 19561509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Self-assessment of classroom assistive listening devices.
    Odelius J; Johansson O
    Int J Audiol; 2010 Jul; 49(7):508-17. PubMed ID: 20524774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Probe microphone measurements: 20 years of progress.
    Mueller HG
    Trends Amplif; 2001 Jun; 5(2):35-68. PubMed ID: 25425897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.