These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26161912)
1. Mercury Emission Ratios from Coal-Fired Power Plants in the Southeastern United States during NOMADSS. Ambrose JL; Gratz LE; Jaffe DA; Campos T; Flocke FM; Knapp DJ; Stechman DM; Stell M; Weinheimer AJ; Cantrell CA; Mauldin RL Environ Sci Technol; 2015 Sep; 49(17):10389-97. PubMed ID: 26161912 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Mercury speciation in coal-fired power plant plumes observed at three surface sites in the southeastern U.S. Edgerton ES; Hartsell BE; Jansen JJ Environ Sci Technol; 2006 Aug; 40(15):4563-70. PubMed ID: 16913107 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Behavior of mercury emissions from a commercial coal-fired power plant: the relationship between stack speciation and near-field plume measurements. Landis MS; Ryan JV; ter Schure AF; Laudal D Environ Sci Technol; 2014 Nov; 48(22):13540-8. PubMed ID: 25325168 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Mercury speciation and mass distribution of coal-fired power plants in Taiwan using different air pollution control processes. Chou CP; Chiu CH; Chang TC; Hsi HC J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2021 May; 71(5):553-563. PubMed ID: 33284737 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Influence of mercury and chlorine content of coal on mercury emissions from coal-fired power plants in China. Zhang L; Wang S; Meng Y; Hao J Environ Sci Technol; 2012 Jun; 46(11):6385-92. PubMed ID: 22533359 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Bibliometric analysis on mercury emissions from coal-fired power plants: a systematic review and future prospect. Liu Q; Gao J; Li G; Zheng Y; Li R; Yue T Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2024 Mar; 31(13):19148-19165. PubMed ID: 38379043 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Major sources of mercury emissions to the atmosphere: The U.S. case. Thanos Bourtsalas AC; Themelis NJ Waste Manag; 2019 Feb; 85():90-94. PubMed ID: 30803618 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effectiveness of Emission Controls to Reduce the Atmospheric Concentrations of Mercury. Castro MS; Sherwell J Environ Sci Technol; 2015 Dec; 49(24):14000-7. PubMed ID: 26606506 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Atmospheric emissions estimation of Hg, As, and Se from coal-fired power plants in China, 2007. Tian H; Wang Y; Xue Z; Qu Y; Chai F; Hao J Sci Total Environ; 2011 Jul; 409(16):3078-81. PubMed ID: 21621816 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessment of mercury emissions inventories for the Great Lakes states. Murray M; Holmes SA Environ Res; 2004 Jul; 95(3):282-97. PubMed ID: 15220063 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Observed decrease in atmospheric mercury explained by global decline in anthropogenic emissions. Zhang Y; Jacob DJ; Horowitz HM; Chen L; Amos HM; Krabbenhoft DP; Slemr F; St Louis VL; Sunderland EM Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2016 Jan; 113(3):526-31. PubMed ID: 26729866 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Reducing mercury emissions from coal-fired power plants in India: Possibilities and challenges. Joy A; Qureshi A Ambio; 2023 Jan; 52(1):242-252. PubMed ID: 35997988 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Ambient air total gaseous mercury concentrations in the vicinity of coal-fired power plants in Alberta, Canada. Mazur M; Mintz R; Lapalme M; Wiens B Sci Total Environ; 2009 Dec; 408(2):373-81. PubMed ID: 19875156 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Updated emission inventories for speciated atmospheric mercury from anthropogenic sources in China. Zhang L; Wang S; Wang L; Wu Y; Duan L; Wu Q; Wang F; Yang M; Yang H; Hao J; Liu X Environ Sci Technol; 2015 Mar; 49(5):3185-94. PubMed ID: 25655106 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Speciation and mass-balance of mercury from pulverized coal fired power plants burning western Canadian subbituminous coals. Goodarzi F J Environ Monit; 2004 Oct; 6(10):792-8. PubMed ID: 15480492 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Influence of flue gas desulfurization (FGD) installations on emission characteristics of PM Li Z; Jiang J; Ma Z; Fajardo OA; Deng J; Duan L Environ Pollut; 2017 Nov; 230():655-662. PubMed ID: 28715770 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Local deposition of mercury in topsoils around coal-fired power plants: is it always true? Rodriguez Martin JA; Nanos N; Grigoratos T; Carbonell G; Samara C Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2014 Sep; 21(17):10205-14. PubMed ID: 24756681 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Study on emission of hazardous trace elements in a 350 MW coal-fired power plant. Part 1. Mercury. Zhao S; Duan Y; Chen L; Li Y; Yao T; Liu S; Liu M; Lu J Environ Pollut; 2017 Oct; 229():863-870. PubMed ID: 28779897 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Increasing mercury risk of fly ash generated from coal-fired power plants in China. Chen Q; Chen L; Li J; Guo Y; Wang Y; Wei W; Liu C; Wu J; Tou F; Wang X; Yang Y J Hazard Mater; 2022 May; 429():128296. PubMed ID: 35065307 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Decadal emission estimates of carbon dioxide, sulfur dioxide, and nitric oxide emissions from coal burning in electric power generation plants in India. Mittal ML; Sharma C; Singh R Environ Monit Assess; 2014 Oct; 186(10):6857-66. PubMed ID: 25004854 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]