These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26162000)

  • 1. Do Payments Pay Off? Evidence from Participation in Costa Rica's PES Program.
    Arriagada RA; Sills EO; Ferraro PJ; Pattanayak SK
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(7):e0131544. PubMed ID: 26162000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Costa Rica's payment for environmental services program: intention, implementation, and impact.
    Sánchez-Azofeifa GA; Pfaff A; Robalino JA; Boomhower JP
    Conserv Biol; 2007 Oct; 21(5):1165-73. PubMed ID: 17883482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Farmers' Preferences for PES Contracts to Adopt Silvopastoral Systems in Southern Ecuador, Revealed Through a Choice Experiment.
    Raes L; Speelman S; Aguirre N
    Environ Manage; 2017 Aug; 60(2):200-215. PubMed ID: 28474210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Impact of payments for environmental services and protected areas on local livelihoods and forest conservation in northern Cambodia.
    Clements T; Milner-Gulland EJ
    Conserv Biol; 2015 Feb; 29(1):78-87. PubMed ID: 25492724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Do payments for forest ecosystem services generate double dividends? An integrated impact assessment of Vietnam's PES program.
    Phan TD; Brouwer R; Hoang LP; Davidson MD
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(8):e0200881. PubMed ID: 30067791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Environmental service payments: evaluating biodiversity conservation trade-offs and cost-efficiency in the Osa Conservation Area, Costa Rica.
    Barton DN; Faith DP; Rusch GM; Acevedo H; Paniagua L; Castro M
    J Environ Manage; 2009 Feb; 90(2):901-11. PubMed ID: 18423841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Correction: Do Payments Pay Off? Evidence from Participation in Costa Rica's PES Program.
    Arriagada RA; Sills EO; Ferraro PJ; Pattanayak SK
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(8):e0136809. PubMed ID: 26301783
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Willingness of Non-Industrial Private Forest Owners to Enter California's Carbon Offset Market.
    Kelly EC; Gold GJ; Di Tommaso J
    Environ Manage; 2017 Nov; 60(5):882-895. PubMed ID: 28836080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An empirical analysis of the effects of China's Land Conversion Program on farmers' income growth and labor transfer.
    Yao S; Guo Y; Huo X
    Environ Manage; 2010 Mar; 45(3):502-12. PubMed ID: 19777292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Rural Household Preferences for Active Participation in "Payment for Ecosystem Service" Programs: A Case in the Miyun Reservoir Catchment, China.
    Li H; Bennett MT; Jiang X; Zhang K; Yang X
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(1):e0169483. PubMed ID: 28046106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Payments for environmental services supported social capital while increasing land management.
    Alix-Garcia JM; Sims KRE; Orozco-Olvera VH; Costica LE; Fernández Medina JD; Romo Monroy S
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2018 Jul; 115(27):7016-7021. PubMed ID: 29903902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Health without wealth? Costa Rica's health system under economic crisis.
    Morgan LM
    J Public Health Policy; 1987; 8(1):86-105. PubMed ID: 3108317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of payments for ecosystem services programs in China on rural household labor allocation and land use: Identifying complex pathways.
    Wang Y; Zhang Q; Bilsborrow R; Tao S; Chen X; Sullivan-Wiley K; Huang Q; Li J; Song C
    Land use policy; 2020 Dec; 99():. PubMed ID: 33223592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Livelihood status assessment of farmers and herdsmen's households based on participatory appraisal: a case in Taipusi Banner of Inner Mongolia].
    Wei W; Xu Z; Shi SL; Tian QS; Wang HP; Liu JL
    Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao; 2011 Oct; 22(10):2686-92. PubMed ID: 22263475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Performance and prospects of payments for ecosystem services programs: evidence from China.
    Yang W; Liu W; Viña A; Luo J; He G; Ouyang Z; Zhang H; Liu J
    J Environ Manage; 2013 Sep; 127():86-95. PubMed ID: 23685121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sustained participation in a Payments for Ecosystem Services program reduces deforestation in a Mexican agricultural frontier.
    Charoud H; Costedoat S; Izquierdo-Tort S; Moros L; Villamayor-Tomás S; Castillo-Santiago MÁ; Wunder S; Corbera E
    Sci Rep; 2023 Dec; 13(1):22314. PubMed ID: 38102237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The efficiency of payments for environmental services in tropical conservation.
    Wunder S
    Conserv Biol; 2007 Feb; 21(1):48-58. PubMed ID: 17298510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of the Permanence of Land Use Change Induced by Payments for Environmental Services in Quindío, Colombia.
    Pagiola S; Honey-Rosés J; Freire-González J
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(3):e0147829. PubMed ID: 26930668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Estimating the impacts of conservation on ecosystem services and poverty by integrating modeling and evaluation.
    Ferraro PJ; Hanauer MM; Miteva DA; Nelson JL; Pattanayak SK; Nolte C; Sims KR
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2015 Jun; 112(24):7420-5. PubMed ID: 26082549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Scaling participation in payments for ecosystem services programs.
    Sorice MG; Donlan CJ; Boyle KJ; Xu W; Gelcich S
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(3):e0192211. PubMed ID: 29522554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.