These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26162249)

  • 1. Validation of renal artery dimensions measured by magnetic resonance angiography in patients referred for renal sympathetic denervation.
    van Kranenburg M; Karanasos A; Chelu RG; van der Heide E; Ouhlous M; Nieman K; van Mieghem N; Krestin G; Niessen W; Zijlstra F; van Geuns RJ; Daemen J
    Acad Radiol; 2015 Sep; 22(9):1106-14. PubMed ID: 26162249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Serial quantitative magnetic resonance angiography follow-up of renal artery dimensions following treatment by four different renal denervation systems.
    van Zandvoort L; van Kranenburg M; Karanasos A; Van Mieghem N; Ouhlous M; van Geuns RJ; van Domburg R; Daemen J
    EuroIntervention; 2017 Apr; 12(18):e2271-e2277. PubMed ID: 28044984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Changes in renal artery dimensions are associated with clinical response to radiofrequency renal denervation: a series of studies using quantitative angiography and intravascular ultrasound.
    Weber T; Kellermair J; Witberg KT; Ligthart J; Melder RJ; Forstner T; Eber B
    J Hypertens; 2017 Oct; 35(10):2069-2076. PubMed ID: 28505064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Non-enhanced MR angiography of renal arteries: comparison with contrast-enhanced MR angiography.
    Angeretti MG; Lumia D; Canì A; Barresi M; Nocchi Cardim L; Piacentino F; Maresca AM; Novario R; Genovese EA; Fugazzola C
    Acta Radiol; 2013 Sep; 54(7):749-56. PubMed ID: 23550187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Renal artery and parenchymal changes after renal denervation: assessment by magnetic resonance angiography.
    Sanders MF; van Doormaal PJ; Beeftink MMA; Bots ML; Fadl Elmula FEM; Habets J; Hammer F; Hoffmann P; Jacobs L; Mark PB; Persu A; Renkin J; Roditi G; Spiering W; Staessen JA; Taylor AH; Verloop WL; Vink EE; Vonken EJ; Voskuil M; Leiner T; Blankestijn PJ;
    Eur Radiol; 2017 Sep; 27(9):3934-3941. PubMed ID: 28271154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. High-spatial-resolution MR angiography of renal arteries with integrated parallel acquisitions: comparison with digital subtraction angiography and US.
    Schoenberg SO; Rieger J; Weber CH; Michaely HJ; Waggershauser T; Ittrich C; Dietrich O; Reiser MF
    Radiology; 2005 May; 235(2):687-98. PubMed ID: 15770035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Diagnosis of renal artery stenosis with magnetic resonance angiography and stenosis quantification].
    Marchand B; Hernandez-Hoyos M; Orkisz M; Douek P
    J Mal Vasc; 2000 Dec; 25(5):312-320. PubMed ID: 11148391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An international multicenter comparison of time-SLIP unenhanced MR angiography and contrast-enhanced CT angiography for assessing renal artery stenosis: the renal artery contrast-free trial.
    Albert TS; Akahane M; Parienty I; Yellin N; Catalá V; Alomar X; Prot A; Tomizawa N; Xue H; Katabathina VS; Lopera JE; Jin Z
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Jan; 204(1):182-8. PubMed ID: 25539255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Iatrogenic renal artery stenosis after renal sympathetic denervation.
    Bacaksiz A; Uyarel H; Jafarov P; Kucukbuzcu S
    Int J Cardiol; 2014 Apr; 172(3):e389-90. PubMed ID: 24461484
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Coronary vessel and luminal area measurement using dual-source computed tomography in comparison with intravascular ultrasound: effect of window settings on measurement accuracy.
    Marwan M; Pflederer T; Schepis T; Seltmann M; Ropers D; Daniel WG; Achenbach S
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2011; 35(1):113-8. PubMed ID: 21245696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Time-resolved contrast-enhanced MR angiography of renal artery stenosis: diagnostic accuracy and interobserver variability.
    Völk M; Strotzer M; Lenhart M; Manke C; Nitz WR; Seitz J; Feuerbach S; Link J
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2000 Jun; 174(6):1583-8. PubMed ID: 10845486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparing the diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced computed tomographic angiography and gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography for the assessment of hemodynamically significant transplant renal artery stenosis.
    Gaddikeri S; Mitsumori L; Vaidya S; Hippe DS; Bhargava P; Dighe MK
    Curr Probl Diagn Radiol; 2014; 43(4):162-8. PubMed ID: 24948209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Acute changes in histopathology and intravascular imaging after catheter-based renal denervation in a porcine model.
    Sakaoka A; Takami A; Onimura Y; Hagiwara H; Terao H; Kumagai F; Matsumura K
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Oct; 90(4):631-638. PubMed ID: 28639746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Safety and Feasibility of Renal Sympathetic Denervation in Patients With Insufficient Renal Artery Length.
    Pua U; Tang AA; Ooi YW; Ho HH; Ong PJ
    Vasc Endovascular Surg; 2016 Jan; 50(1):63-7. PubMed ID: 26912530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Comparison of quantitative computerized angiography and intravascular ultrasound in assessment of renal artery stenosis in patients with renovascular hypertension treated with percutaneous transluminal angioplasty with concomitant intravascular brachytherapy].
    Lekston A; Niklewski T; Szkodziński J; Gasior M; Gierlotka M; Chudek J; Wiecek A; Kokot F; Fijałkowski M; Białas B; Osadnik T; Maciejewski B; Poloński L
    Pol Merkur Lekarski; 2010 Apr; 28(166):268-72. PubMed ID: 20491335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Renal artery stenosis and accessory renal arteries: accuracy of detection and visualization with gadolinium-enhanced breath-hold MR angiography.
    Bakker J; Beek FJ; Beutler JJ; Hene RJ; de Kort GA; de Lange EE; Moons KG; Mali WP
    Radiology; 1998 May; 207(2):497-504. PubMed ID: 9577501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The limitations of magnetic resonance angiography in the diagnosis of renal artery stenosis: comparative analysis with conventional arteriography.
    Patel ST; Mills JL; Tynan-Cuisinier G; Goshima KR; Westerband A; Hughes JD
    J Vasc Surg; 2005 Mar; 41(3):462-8. PubMed ID: 15838481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Renal artery stenosis evaluation: diagnostic performance of gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced MR angiography--comparison with DSA.
    Soulez G; Pasowicz M; Benea G; Grazioli L; Niedmann JP; Konopka M; Douek PC; Morana G; Schaefer FK; Vanzulli A; Bluemke DA; Maki JH; Prince MR; Schneider G; Ballarati C; Coulden R; Wasser MN; McCauley TR; Kirchin MA; Pirovano G
    Radiology; 2008 Apr; 247(1):273-85. PubMed ID: 18372471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. 3D contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the abdominal aorta and its distal branches: Interobserver agreement of radiologists in a routine examination.
    Billaud Y; Beuf O; Desjeux G; Valette PJ; Pilleul F
    Acad Radiol; 2005 Feb; 12(2):155-63. PubMed ID: 15721592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Magnetic resonance angiography of renal arterial stenosis.
    Grist TM
    Coron Artery Dis; 1999 May; 10(3):151-6. PubMed ID: 10352893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.